ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1353

Improvement in Physical Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Work Productivity with Adalimumab Treatment in Nonradiographic Axial Spa: Wk-52 Results From Ability-1

Désirée van der Heijde1, Philip J. Mease2, Aileen L. Pangan3, Sumati Rao4, Naijun Chen4 and Mary A. Cifaldi4, 1Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Swedish Rheumatology Research Group, Seattle, WA, 3Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, 4Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Health Assessment Questionnaire, patient questionnaires and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To evaluate long-term effects of adalimumab (ADA) treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA).

Methods: Ability-1 is an ongoing Phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of ADA vs. placebo (PBO) in patients with nr-axSpA (fulfilling ASAS axial SpA criteria but not modified New York criteria for AS). Following the 12-wk double-blind phase, all patients were switched to open-label (OL) ADA (represented by ADA/ADA and PBO/ADA groups) for 144 wks. This post hoc analysis evaluated physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and work productivity until Wk 52. Physical function was assessed using the disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) and HRQOL using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) score. Productivity was assessed using the overall work impairment domain of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Changes from baseline to Wk 12 were compared between groups using ANCOVA with adjustment for baseline scores and with treatment as a factor. Analyses were conducted on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population excluding 7 subjects from a noncompliant site and the OL population (patients who had at least 1 dose of OL ADA).

Results: After 12 wks of therapy in the double-blind period, the ADA group experienced statistically significant improvements in HAQ-S (p<0.02) and SF-36 PCS (p<0.001) compared with PBO. A total of 179 patients entered the OL period (87/91 and 92/94 from the original ADA and PBO arms, respectively) and 150/151/81 patients completed the HAQ-S, SF-36 PCS, and work productivity questionnaires, respectively, at Wk 52 (table). At Wk 52, approximately 62% of the patients met the minimum important difference (MID) for HAQ-S of 0.26 and 77% met the MID for SF-36 PCS of 3.0. Nearly 65% of the patients also met the MID for work productivity of 7% at Wk 52. PBO patients who switched to OL ADA experienced improvements in HRQOL and work productivity levels comparable to patients who received ADA through Wk 52. By Wk 52, patients in both groups achieved SF-36 scores (42.8 and 44.1 for the PBO/ADA and ADA/ADA groups, respectively) that approached the US general population norm of 50.

 

Change From Baseline Through Wk 52 in Physical Function, HRQL, and Work Productivity in Patients With nr-axSpA.

 

Wk 12 (ITT)

Wk 24 (OL Population)

Wk 52 (OL Population)

 

PBO

ADAa

PBO/ADAa

ADA/ADA

PBO/ADA

ADA/ADA

HAQ-S (mean ± SD)b,c

n = 90

-0.14 ± 0.43

n = 88

-0.28 ± 0.50

n = 89

-0.38 ± 0.56

n = 82

-0.40 ± 0.39

n = 78

-0.48 ± 0.52

n = 72

-0.41 ± 0.45

SF-36 (PCS) (mean ± SD)b,c

n = 93

2.0 ± 7.04

n = 91

5.5 ± 8.98

n = 90

7.0 ± 9.42

n = 87

7.4 ± 9.66

n = 79

9.4 ± 10.42

n = 72

9.9 ± 9.82

Work productivity (mean ± SD)b,c

n = 47

-5.7 ± 28.63

n = 49

-12.1 ± 28.84

n = 46

-20.8 ± 27.75

n = 49

-18.5 ± 26.34

n = 43

-21.0 ± 35.55

n = 38

-24.7 ± 27.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aCorresponds to 12 wks of ADA treatment.

bn = number of subjects with nonmissing values for both baseline and the respective visit. Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing value prior to the first dose of study drug.
cMID thresholds are -0.26, 3.0, and 7.0% for HAQ-S, SF-36 (PCS), and work productivity, respectively.

 

 

 

Conclusion: Patients who remained on ADA therapy for 52 wks had sustained improvement in PRO and productivity. Likewise, patients who received PBO and switched to ADA in the OL period showed improvement in physical function, HRQOL, and work productivity that was maintained through Wk 52.


Disclosure:

D. van der Heijde,

Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Aventis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Centocor, Pfizer, Roche, Schering Plough, UCB, Wyeth ,

5;

P. J. Mease,

Abbott Laboratories,

5,

Abbott Laboratories,

2,

Abbott Laboratories,

8;

A. L. Pangan,

Abbott Laboratories,

3,

Abbott Laboratories,

1;

S. Rao,

Abbott Laboratories,

1,

Abbott Laboratories,

3;

N. Chen,

Abbott Laboratories,

3,

Abbott Laboratories,

1;

M. A. Cifaldi,

Abbott Laboratories,

3,

Abbott Laboratories,

1.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvement-in-physical-function-health-related-quality-of-life-and-work-productivity-with-adalimumab-treatment-in-nonradiographic-axial-spa-wk-52-results-from-ability-1/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology