ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1427

Impact of Upadacitinib versus Abatacept on Individual Disease Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Responses to Biologic DMARDs

Ronald van Vollenhoven1, Andrea Rubbert-Roth2, Stephen Hall3, Ricardo Xavier4, Anna K Shmagel5, Yanna Song5, Samuel Anyanwu5 and Vibeke Strand6, 1Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland, 3Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 4Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 5AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prior inadequate response to biologic DMARD(s) (bDMARD-IR) demonstrated superiority of the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) vs abatacept (ABA) in the mean change from baseline (BL) in DAS28(CRP) and in the proportion achieving DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 at week (wk) 12, with higher incidence of serious adverse events reported in the UPA treatment group.

We evaluate the impact of UPA vs ABA on individual components of composite measures of disease activity in SELECT-CHOICE.

Methods: In SELECT-CHOICE, a double-blind phase 3 trial, bDMARD-IR patients were randomly assigned to UPA 15 mg once daily or ABA, each with background conventional synthetic DMARDs, for 24 wks. For this post hoc analysis, the proportions of patients achieving improvement from BL through wk 24 in ACR core variables (including SJC, TJC, Patient Global Assessment [PtGA], Physician Global Assessment [PhGA], pain, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP) and Boolean remission criteria were evaluated. Differences in the cumulative distributions of CDAI, DAS28(hsCRP), SDAI, and ACR-n (the lowest of percent change in TJC, percent change in SJC, or median of the other 5 ACR components) were determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and are reported as observed. For all other variables, non-responder imputation was applied for missing data. Nominal P values are provided throughout.

Results: A total of 616 bDMARD-IR patients with moderate to severe RA were randomized in SELECT-CHOICE (UPA 15 mg, n=303; ABA, n=309). BL demographic and disease characteristics were generally comparable between treatment groups, with a mean disease duration of approximately 12 years and mean CDAI of 39.6. At wk 12, more patients receiving UPA vs ABA achieved ≥50% improvements from BL in TJC68, PtGA, and hsCRP, with comparable proportions observed between UPA and ABA for the remaining ACR components (Figure). At wk 24, similar proportions of patients receiving UPA and ABA achieved ≥50% improvements in all but the hsCRP component. Overall, 15% and 26% of patients on UPA compared with 6% and 15% on ABA demonstrated ≥50% improvements across all ACR components at wks 12 and 24, respectively. At wks 12 and 24, Boolean remission was achieved by 6% and 14% of patients on UPA vs 2% and 10% of patients on ABA, respectively; the proportion of patients in both treatment groups achieving the individual Boolean components were also reported (Table). While comparable at BL, cumulative distributions of CDAI, SDAI, DAS28(hsCRP), and ACR-n were improved on UPA vs ABA at wk 12 (all nominal P < 0.05); differences persisted for most measures at wk 24.

Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis of bDMARD-IR RA patients, improvements in components of disease measures were reported for both UPA and ABA through 24 weeks, with numeric differences noted for several components. Nominally higher attainment of Boolean remission and its components were observed for UPA over ABA.

References
1. Rubbert-Roth A, et al. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1511-21.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: R. van Vollenhoven, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), UCB, Merck/MSD, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Galapagos, Janssen, Miltenyi, R-Pharma; A. Rubbert-Roth, None; S. Hall, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Lilly, Janssen, UCB, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead, Merck; R. Xavier, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; A. Shmagel, AbbVie; Y. Song, AbbVie; S. Anyanwu, AbbVie; V. Strand, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Celltrion, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Rheos, R-Pharma, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Scipher, Setpoint, Spherix, Aria, Bioventus, Blackrock, Equilium, Glenmark, Horizon, Kypha, Lilly, MiMedx, Sorrento, Tonix, Priovant.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Vollenhoven R, Rubbert-Roth A, Hall S, Xavier R, Shmagel A, Song Y, Anyanwu S, Strand V. Impact of Upadacitinib versus Abatacept on Individual Disease Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Responses to Biologic DMARDs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-upadacitinib-versus-abatacept-on-individual-disease-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-responses-to-biologic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-upadacitinib-versus-abatacept-on-individual-disease-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-responses-to-biologic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology