ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1435

Impact of Treatment With Upadacitinib on Non-Nociceptive Pain and Its Relevance for the Presence of Residual Symptoms in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from a Multicountry Observational Study

Denis Poddubnyy1, Victoria Navarro-Compan2, Neil Basu3, Mohammad Naffaa4, Tianming Gao5, Christopher Saffore6, Jamie Urbanik7, Bhumik Parikh8, Peter Taylor9 and Philip J. Mease10, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Epidemiology, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany, 2Department of Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain, 3Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 4The Azriel's Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel; The Rheumatology Unity, Galilee Medical Center, Naharyia, Israel, 5AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, 6AbbVie Inc., waukegan, IL, 7AbbVie, Grayslake, IL, 8AbbVie, Hillsborough Township, NJ, 9University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 10Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Back pain, Disease Activity, fibromyalgia, pain, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1434–1466) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, has demonstrated improvements in inflammation and nociceptive pain in late phase clinical trials of patients with axSpA.1,2,3 However, patients may also experience non-nociceptive pain via altered central nervous system modulation (nociplastic), including fibromyalgia (FM), or peripheral nervous system damage (neuropathic). This post hoc analysis of a real-world study in patients with axSpA examined the impact of UPA treatment on non-nociceptive pain and the association of non-nociceptive pain with residual symptoms, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression.

Methods: UPSTAND was a 12-month, multicountry, noninterventional, observational study evaluating the effectiveness of UPA on pain in adult patients with axSpA. Safety from UPSTAND has been previously analyzed.4 This analysis used interim data collected after all patients completed at least week (wk) 12. Patients were grouped by severity of neuropathic pain, as captured by painDETECT (< 13, 13-18, and > 18) or severity of nociplastic pain, as captured by widespread pain index (WPI: < 4, 4-6, and > 6). While patients demonstrating active symptoms of FM per clinical diagnosis were excluded from UPSTAND, WPI and symptom severity score (SSS) were used together to assess the presence of nociplastic pain fulfilling FM criteria as per Wolfe et al. 2016: WPI 4-6 and SSS ≥ 9 or WPI ≥ 7 and SSS ≥ 5.5 All other scores (absence of FM) were grouped together. The proportion of patients in each group was reported at baseline (BL) and wk 12. For those with available data, the proportion of patients in each group was reported at wk 24. The association of non-nociceptive pain with measures of disease activity, sleep quality, and symptoms of anxiety/depression was assessed by analyzing the proportion of patients in each group at wk 12 that did or did not achieve ASDAS low disease activity (ASDAS LDA; < 2.1), BASDAI < 4, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Score < 5, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≤ 7 at wk 12. The change from BL in total back pain, nocturnal back pain, fatigue (BASDAI question 1), and BASFI at wk 12 was reported for each group.

Results: Overall, UPA treatment was associated with a reduction in the burden of nociplastic and neuropathic pain over time (Figure 1). The proportion of patients in the least severe pain groups increased from BL over time; the proportion of patients in the more severe pain groups or meeting criteria for FM decreased over time. Non-nociceptive pain at wk 12 was associated with residual symptoms, anxiety/depression, and poor sleep (Figure 2). The presence of non-nociceptive pain was associated with smaller improvements in total back pain, nocturnal back pain, fatigue, and BASFI from BL to wk 12 (Figure 3).

Conclusion: In patients with axSpA, treatment with UPA was associated with improvements in non-nociceptive pain. Non-nociceptive pain was associated with residual symptoms, sleep disturbance, signs of anxiety/ depression, and fatigue.1. van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet. 2019;394:2108-17.2. van der Heijde D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1515-23.3. Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2022;400:369-79.4. Poddubnyy D, et al. [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025;83:1.5. Wolfe F, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:319-29.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: D. Poddubnyy: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Biocad, 2, BMS, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, Moonlake, 2, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Samsung Bioepis, 6, UCB, 2, 6; V. Navarro-Compan: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfasigma, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; N. Basu: AbbVie, 6, AstraZeneca, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, GSK, 2, 5, MSD, 2, Nesos, 5, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Vifor, 2, 5, 6; M. Naffaa: AbbVie, 5, 6, BI, 5, Eli Lilly, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6; T. Gao: AbbVie, 3, 11; C. Saffore: AbbVie, 3, 11; J. Urbanik: AbbVie, 3, 11; B. Parikh: AbbVie, 3, 11; P. Taylor: AbbVie, 2, Acelyrin, Inc., 2, Alfasigma S.p.A., 2, 5, Biogen, 2, Eli Lilly & Co., 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Gilead, 2, Immunovant, 2, Moonlake, 2, Nordic Pharma, 2, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Poddubnyy D, Navarro-Compan V, Basu N, Naffaa M, Gao T, Saffore C, Urbanik J, Parikh B, Taylor P, Mease P. Impact of Treatment With Upadacitinib on Non-Nociceptive Pain and Its Relevance for the Presence of Residual Symptoms in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from a Multicountry Observational Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-treatment-with-upadacitinib-on-non-nociceptive-pain-and-its-relevance-for-the-presence-of-residual-symptoms-in-axial-spondyloarthritis-results-from-a-multicountry-observational-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-treatment-with-upadacitinib-on-non-nociceptive-pain-and-its-relevance-for-the-presence-of-residual-symptoms-in-axial-spondyloarthritis-results-from-a-multicountry-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology