ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1522

Impact of Sarilumab on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL),  Fatigue, and Sleep in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients at Week 24 – Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study

Vibeke Strand1, George Joseph2, Hubert van Hoogstraten2, Chieh-I Chen3, Chungpeng Fan2, Paulo Carita4, Neil Graham3, Tanya Momtahen2 and Mark C Genovese5, 1Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, 2Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, 3Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, 4Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France, 5Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, clinical trials, outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PRO

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the IL-6 receptor, demonstrated efficacy in the phase 3 part of the RA-MOBILITY study (NCT01061736) in adults with active, moderate-to-severe RA with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX).1 Most common TEAEs included infections and injection site reactions. A higher incidence of serious infections was observed with sarilumab. Lab abnormalities included decreases in neutrophils and increases in transaminases and lipids. This analysis focuses on the impact of sarilumab + MTX on HRQoL, fatigue, and sleep, all of which were pre-defined secondary endpoints at Week 24 among patients who had a patient reported outcome (PRO) measured at that time point. Overall work impairment due to RA was assessed at Week 12.

Methods: The intent-to-treat population included 1,197 patients who were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo + MTX, sarilumab 150 mg every two weeks (q2w) + MTX or 200 mg q2w + MTX. The Short Form-36 (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Sleep-Visual Analog Scale (Sleep-VAS) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires were assessed at baseline, Weeks 12 (WPAI only), 24 and 52.

Results: Statistically significant improvements versus placebo + MTX in SF-36 T-Scores for Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), all 8 domains of SF-36, FACIT-F and Sleep-VAS were reported by patients receiving sarilumab 150 mg + MTX and 200 mg + MTX at Week 24, which exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in all SF-36 summary and domain scores (PCS and MCS: 2.5; 8 domains: 5.0), FACIT-F (3.0) and Sleep-VAS (4.1) scores in both active treatment groups (Table 1, Bolded). Improvements evident at Week 24 were sustained through Week 52. Statistically significant improvements in WPAI “% overall work impairment due to RA” scores were reported for 150 mg + MTX group at Week 12. 

Conclusion: In this Phase 3 trial, patients with active RA receiving either dose of sarilumab q2w + MTX reported clinically meaningful change from baseline in all HRQoL and fatigue scores at Week 24, which were maintained through Week 52.  Statistically significant benefit was also reported in sleep and “% overall work impairment due to RA” for sarilumab 150 mg q2w + MTX dose.

1.     Genovese M et al. Abstr. EULAR14-SCIE-3001, EULAR 2014.

Table 1. HRQoL, Fatigue, WPAI-% overall work impairment due to RA, and Sleep-VAS at Baseline, Week 12 (for WPAI only), and Week 24

 PRO

Placebo

Sarilumab 150 mg + MTX

Sarilumab 200 mg + MTX

SF-36 PCS

Baseline mean

32.15

31.92

31.24

Mean change from baseline

5.27

8.16

8.83

LSM difference, 95% CI

2.860(1.630,4.091)

3.201(1.978,4.423)

p-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

SF-36 MCS

Baseline mean

37.82

39.46

38.92

Mean change from baseline

3.98

5.10

7.79

LSM difference, 95% CI

1.808(0.285,3.331)

4.271(2.761,5.781)

p-value

0.0200

<0.0001

SF-36 PF

Baseline mean

29.06

29.36

28.70

Mean change from baseline

4.97

7.19

7.77

LSM difference, 95% CI

2.357(0.809,3.906)

2.650(1.106,4.194)

p-value

0.0029

0.0008

SF-36 RP

Baseline mean

31.93

32.37

32.03

Mean change from baseline

4.99

7.10

7.92

LSM difference, 95% CI

2.324(0.952,3.696)

2.991(1.628,4.354)

p-value

0.0009

<0.0001

SF-36 BP

Baseline mean

33.13

33.20

32.65

Mean change from baseline

6.59

10.75

12.02

LSM difference, 95% CI

4.256(2.864,5.649)

5.193(3.807,6.580)

p-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

SF-36 GH

Baseline mean

35.04

35.41

34.13

Mean change from baseline

3.83

6.11

7.73

LSM difference, 95% CI

2.473(1.179,3.767)

3.597(2.312,4.881)

p-value

0.0002

<0.0001

SF-36 VT

Baseline mean

40.67

41.30

40.19

Mean change from baseline

5.43

7.16

9.72

LSM difference, 95% CI

2.073(0.580,3.566)

4.127(2.647,5.607)

p-value

0.0066

<0.0001

SF-36 SF

Baseline mean

34.38

35.59

34.76

Mean change from baseline

4.50

7.11

9.12

LSM difference, 95% CI

3.270(1.786,4.754)

4.814(3.340,6.288)

p-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

SF-36 RE

Baseline mean

30.70

31.41

31.49

Mean change from baseline

4.50

6.21

7.70

LSM difference, 95% CI

1.997(0.236,3.759)

3.548(1.800,5.297)

p-value

0.0263

<0.0001

SF-36 MH

Baseline mean

37.07

39.15

37.59

Mean change from baseline

4.29

5.10

7.77

LSM difference, 95% CI

1.686(0.147,3.224)

3.694(2.172,5.215)

p-value

0.0318

<0.0001

FACIT-F

 

 

 

Baseline mean

27.24

22.07

26.16

Mean change from baseline

6.49

9.1

10.16

LSM difference, 95% CI

 

2.817 (1.552, 4.083)

3.351 (2.092, 4.611)

p-value

 

<0.0001

<0.0001

WPAI- % overall work impairment due to RA

 

 

 

Baseline mean

51.55

49.26

54.33

Mean change from baseline

-9.26

-17.84

-18.00

LSM difference, 95% CI

 

-9.606 (-17.144, -2.068)

-7.228 (-14.854, 0.397)

p-value

 

0.0127

0.0631

Sleep VAS

 

 

 

Baseline mean 

54.05

53.77

54.23

Mean change from baseline

-16.89

-23.17

-23.07

LSM difference, 95% CI

 

-6.778 (-10.734, -2.821)

-6.891(-10.826, -2.955)

p-value

 

0.0008

0.0006

PCS=Physical Component Summary, LSM=Least Square Means, MCS=Mental Component Summary, PF=Physical Function, RP=Role Physical, BP=Bodily Pain, GH=General Health, VT=Vitality, SF=Social Functioning, RE=Role Emotional, MH=Mental Health & VAS=Visual Analog Scale

 


Disclosure:

V. Strand,

Abbvie ,

5,

Amgen,

5,

Anthera,

5,

AstraZeneca/medimmune,

5,

BiogenIdec,

5,

BioMarin,

5,

Celltrion,

5,

BMS,

5,

Genentech/Roche,

5,

GSK,

5,

Hospira,

5,

Incyte,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Lilly,

5,

MerckSerono,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Novo Nordisk,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Regeneron,

5,

Royalty,

5,

Sanofi – Genzyme ,

5,

Takeda,

5,

UCB,

5,

Vertex,

5;

G. Joseph,

Amgen, Pfizer,

1,

Sanofi,

3;

H. van Hoogstraten,

Sanofi ,

3;

C. I. Chen,

Regeneron,

3;

C. Fan,

Sanofi,

1,

Sanofi,

3;

P. Carita,

Carita,

1,

Carita,

3;

N. Graham,

Regeneron,

1,

Regeneron,

3;

T. Momtahen,

Sanofi ,

1,

Sanofi ,

3;

M. C. Genovese,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Sanofi ,

2,

Sanofi ,

5,

Regeneron,

2,

Regeneron,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-sarilumab-on-health-related-quality-of-life-hrqol-fatigue-and-sleep-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-at-week-24-results-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-cont/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology