ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1408

Impact of Participation in the Adalimumab (Humira) Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Passion Study

Filip van Den Bosch1, Andrew Östör2, Siegfried Wassenberg3, Naijun Chen4, Chen Wang5, Vishvas Garg4 and Jasmina Kalabic6, 1Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium, 2Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 3Rheumazentrum, Ratingen, Germany, 4AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 5AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Adalimumab, patient outcomes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient (pt) Support Program (PSP) is offered to pts who are prescribed adalimumab (ADA) for their Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). How participation in a PSP may impact pt-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been explored extensively in a prospective study. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the effect of ADA PSP participation on PROs among RA pts initiating ADA.

Methods: In this multi-country, ex-US, 78 week (wk) study, pts were offered a panel of  “Core elements” (starter pack, call center/hotline, nursing services, educational material, and injection guide; offered in all participating countries) and “Other elements” (e.g, refill reminders, email, newsletters, support groups, home delivery, and financial assistance; vary by country) of PSP. Pts were divided in 2 groups on the basis of their participation in the PSP: ever (PSP users) vs never (PSP non-users). The following PROs were assessed over time to analyze the effectiveness of ADA in context of PSP utilization: Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13, evaluates knowledge, skills, and confidence essential to a pt managing his/her own health; scores classified a priori into 4 levels [higher level = greater pt involvement in disease management]), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI, evaluates absenteeism, presenteesism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment), Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology (CQR, measures compliance to drug regimen), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM, evaluates convenience, effectiveness, side effects and global satisfaction). Change in pt perceptions was measured by the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ, necessity and concern scales).

Results: Percentage (%) of pts that demonstrated improvement in PAM-13 levels were significantly higher among PSP users vs PSP non-users at wk 78 compared to BL (35.7% vs 28.1%, P=0.01). Additionally, compared to PSP non-users, PSP users had a significantly higher % of pts that started at level 4 at BL and remained at level 4 at wk 78 of ADA treatment (52.4% vs 28.9%, P=0.001); and % of pts that started at level 3 at BL and stayed at level 3 or improved to level 4 at wk 78 (64.5% vs 53.8%, P=0.028). PSP users had lower activity impairment (WPAI), higher convenience and global satisfaction (TSQM), and showed improvement in the necessity scale (BMQ) at all measured time points. Only numerical improvement in the favor of PSP users was observed for CQR (Table).

Conclusion: In pts with moderate to severe RA, PSP users reported significant improvements after 78 wks of ADA initiation in managing their health and had skills and confidence to do so as evidenced by higher PAM-13 levels compared to the PSP non-users. Additionally, PSP users had significantly lower activity impairment, improved convenience and global satisfaction, and felt higher necessity for prescribed medication in comparison to the PSP non-users.


Disclosure: F. van Den Bosch, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB, 5,AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB, 8; A. Östör, Roche, Chugai, MSD, AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Napp, and BMS, 5; S. Wassenberg, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Chugai, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD and UCB, 5,AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Chugai, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD and UCB, 8; N. Chen, AbbVie Inc, 1; C. Wang, AbbVie Inc, 1; V. Garg, AbbVie Inc, 1; J. Kalabic, AbbVie Inc, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Den Bosch F, Östör A, Wassenberg S, Chen N, Wang C, Garg V, Kalabic J. Impact of Participation in the Adalimumab (Humira) Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Passion Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-participation-in-the-adalimumab-humira-patient-support-program-on-patient-reported-outcomes-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-passion-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-participation-in-the-adalimumab-humira-patient-support-program-on-patient-reported-outcomes-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-passion-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology