ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2408

Impact of Pain and Fatigue on Quality of Life Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Amanda Eudy1, Megan Clowse2, Meenakshi Jolly3, David Pisetsky4, Kai Sun5, Rebecca Sadun5, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber6, Mithu Maheswaranathan6, Jayanth Doss5 and Jennifer Rogers6, 1Duke University, Raleigh, NC, 2Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 3Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, 4Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 5Duke University, Durham, NC, 6Duke University, Durham

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Fatigue, pain, quality of life, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Our prior qualitative work discovered a subgroup of patients with SLE who experience persistent symptoms of fatigue and widespread pain, even on self-described “good days.” The objective of this study was to utilize a modified version of the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) to identify this subgroup of patients and measure the impact of this high symptom burden on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: SLE patients meeting SLICC criteria were enrolled in lupus registry at a tertiary care center. Rheumatologists completed the SLEDAI and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Active SLE was defined as SLEDAI ≥6, clinical SLEDAI ≥4, PGA ≥1, or active nephritis. Patients completed the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and LupusPRO. We adapted the SLAQ to ask, “Thinking of your most recent good day with lupus, please rate the activity of your lupus,” with a scale of 0 (no lupus activity) to 10 (most lupus activity). We also asked patients’ frequency of good days (never, seldom, some of the time, or most of the time). Patients were grouped based on their score as having a “Good” good day (scores of 0 to 4) or “Bad” good day (scores of 5-10). Descriptive statistics estimated differences between groups.

Results: The survey was completed by 259 patients (mean age 44 years, 92% female, 59% Black, 5% Hispanic). A “Good” good day was reported by 74% of patients, while 26% of patients reported a “Bad” good day. Patients with “Bad” good days were more likely to have an annual income less than $50,000, have education less than a college degree, and be insured through Medicaid or Medicare or be uninsured; otherwise, demographics were similar (Table 1). Patients with “Bad” good days had higher clinical SLEDAI and PGA scores, with 53% having active SLE at the time of their visit, compared to 29% of patients with “Good” good days. Patients with “Bad” good days experienced more polysymptomatic distress, and 30% met ACR criteria for fibromyalgia, compared to 16% of patients with “Good” good days.

Most patients with “Good” good days were asymptomatic (Table 2), and 93% experienced good days most or some of the time. Even so, 24% experienced moderate to severe fatigue on their good days. In contrast, patients with “Bad” good days experienced moderate to severe symptoms of pain or stiffness in joints, swelling in joints, muscle pain, fatigue, forgetfulness, muscle weakness, depression, and anxiety. In this group of patients, good days were less frequent, with 26% saying they seldom or never had a good day.

Patients with “Bad” good days experienced decreased HRQoL, with worse LupusPRO domain scores for lupus symptoms, cognition, lupus medications, physical health, sleep, fatigue, pain, emotional health, body image, and desires, goals, and plans (Figure 1).

Conclusion: There is a subset of patients with SLE who experience symptoms of pain and fatigue even on their self-described good days. This burden of symptoms has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. While almost one-third of patients with the highest burden of symptoms met ACR criteria for fibromyalgia, half of patients also had active inflammatory SLE symptoms on the day of the visit, suggesting isolated fibromyalgia is not the only contributor to poor quality of life in patients with SLE.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Cohort Characteristics (n=259).

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Moderate or Severe Symptoms on a “Good Day”

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. LupusPRO Quality of Life Domains


Disclosures: A. Eudy: Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Immunovant, 5; M. Clowse: AstraZeneca, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; M. Jolly: AURINIA, 1, 9, 10; D. Pisetsky: None; K. Sun: None; R. Sadun: None; L. Criscione-Schreiber: None; M. Maheswaranathan: AstraZeneca, 2; J. Doss: None; J. Rogers: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eudy A, Clowse M, Jolly M, Pisetsky D, Sun K, Sadun R, Criscione-Schreiber L, Maheswaranathan M, Doss J, Rogers J. Impact of Pain and Fatigue on Quality of Life Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-pain-and-fatigue-on-quality-of-life-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-pain-and-fatigue-on-quality-of-life-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology