ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0895

Impact of Glucocorticoid Tapering in Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis From the SELECT-GCA Trial

FRANK BUTTGEREIT1, Kevin Winthrop2, Leonard Calabrese3, Ivan Lagunes4, Aditi Kadakia5, Ana Romero6, Shaofei Zhao4, Weihan Zhao4, Arathi Setty4 and Jeffrey Curtis7, 1Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 4Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 5AbbVie Inc, Woburn, MA, 6AbbVie, Barcelona, Spain, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, giant cell arteritis, glucocorticoids, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders I: GCA From Bench to Bedside (0891–0896)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-11:15AM

Background/Purpose: This study assessed the occurrence of adverse events of serious infections, herpes zoster, and opportunistic infection during concomitant treatment with GCs and after GC tapering in patients with GCA receiving UPA or PBO in the SELECT-GCA trial.

Methods: Patients in this analysis from SELECT-GCA1 were diagnosed with new-onset or relapsing GCA, had previous exposure to ≥40 mg prednisone (or equivalent) daily, and were on a baseline prednisone dose of ≥20 mg daily. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze adverse events through week 52, presented as time to first event (patients with no events were censored at the end of the study period). Event rates were calculated for data from patients with ≥1 event of the same type.

Results: Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups were similar.1 Baseline GC doses for UPA were: 20 mg (30%, n=95); 30 mg (22%, n=70); 40 mg (29%, n=91); 50 mg (10%, n=32); 60 mg (9%, n=28). Baseline GC doses were similarly distributed for PBO: 20 mg (27%, n=30); 30 mg (26%, n=29); 40 mg (28%, n=31); 50 mg (14%, n=16); 60 mg (5%, n=6). Rates of serious infections were lower with both doses of UPA than PBO through week 52 (UPA7.5, 7.9 [95% CI: 3.2, 16.3]; UPA15, 7.9 [4.3, 13.2]; PBO 12.7 [6.6, 22.2] events per 100 patient-years [E/100 PY]). Herpes zoster, a known risk for JAK inhibitors including UPA, had higher rates with UPA15 vs PBO (7.3 [95% CI: 3.9, 12.5] E/100 PY vs 4.2 [1.2, 10.9] E/100 PY) or UPA7.5 (4.5 [1.2, 11.6] E/100 PY). Rates of opportunistic infections were low in all groups, although numerically higher in the UPA15 group compared to PBO (2.2 [95% CI: 0.6, 5.8] E/100 PY vs 1.1 [0, 5.9] E/100 PY); no opportunistic infections were reported for UPA7.5. In UPA-treated patients, rates of serious infections were comparable across during the GC-taper period (difference ≤ week 26 for UPA – PBO: 0.3 [95% CI: -5.8, 6.4] and -0.3 [-5.4, 4.8] E/100 PY for UPA7.5 and UPA15. Rates of serious infections were lower in the post-taper period with UPA7.5 or UPA15 relative to PBO (treatment difference from > week 26 to week 52: UPA7.5, -5.1 [95% CI: -12.1, 1.9] and UPA15, -4.6 [-11.1, 2.0] E/100 PY). Rates of herpes zoster were similar in UPA-treated patients during the GC taper (treatment difference for UPA – PBO: UPA7.5, -3.1 [95% CI: -7.8, 1.6] and UPA15, 1.4 [-4.0, 6.8] E/100 PY) and post-GC taper (treatment difference: 3.4 [95% CI: -0.4, 7.2] and 1.7 [-0.2, 3.6] E/100 PY). Of the 4 opportunistic infections in UPA15, 3 events occurred during the GC taper and 1 occurred post-taper.

Conclusion: The rate of serious infection through 52 weeks was lower in patients treated with UPA combined with a 26-week GC taper versus PBO with a 52-week GC taper, with rates lower with UPA relative to PBO after tapering GCs in the UPA groups. The decrease in serious infection rates during the GC-free phase suggests GC use may contribute to the risk of serious infections. GC tapering did not appear to affect the occurrence of HZ in the UPA groups. These results support the use of UPA15 with a standardized approach to GC tapering to reduce GC burden in older populations with an elevated infection risk.References:1. Blockmans D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2413449.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: F. BUTTGEREIT: Abbvie, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Galapagos, 5, 6, grant support, consultancy fees, honoraria and travel expenses from Abbvie, Pfizer, Gruenenthal, and Horizon Therapeutics, all unrelated, 12, grant support, consultancy fees, honoraria and travel expenses from Abbvie, Pfizer, Gruenenthal, and Horizon Therapeutics, all unrelated, Janssen, 6, Medac, 5, 6, Novartis, 1, 6, pf, 5, 6, Roche, 6, Sanofi, 5, 6; K. Winthrop: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Moderna, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 2, Union Chimique Belge, 2; L. Calabrese: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Fate Therapeutics, 2, Galvani, 2, Genentech, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, 6, Mymee, 2, Open Evidence, 2, PPD, 2, Regeneron, 2, 6, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; I. Lagunes: AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Kadakia: AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Romero: AbbVie/Abbott, 3; S. Zhao: AbbVie, 3, 11; W. Zhao: AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Setty: AbbVie, 3, 11; J. Curtis: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi/Regeneron, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

BUTTGEREIT F, Winthrop K, Calabrese L, Lagunes I, Kadakia A, Romero A, Zhao S, Zhao W, Setty A, Curtis J. Impact of Glucocorticoid Tapering in Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis From the SELECT-GCA Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-glucocorticoid-tapering-in-giant-cell-arteritis-analysis-from-the-select-gca-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-glucocorticoid-tapering-in-giant-cell-arteritis-analysis-from-the-select-gca-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology