ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0911

Impact of Filgotinib on Structural Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints at 12 Weeks in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Correlation with Clinical Endpoints

Walter Maksymowych1, Mikkel Østergaard2, Robert Landewé3, William Barchuk4, Ke Liu4, Chantal Tasset5, Leen Gilles5, Thijs Hendrikx6, Robin Besuyen6 and Xenofon Baraliakos7, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Amsterdam University Medical Center & Zuyderland Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 5Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium, 6Galapagos BV, Leiden, Netherlands, 7Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet-Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the Phase 2 TORTUGA trial (NCT03117270), the oral, selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor filgotinib reduced inflammation in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as measured by Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores (van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2018;392:2378–87). In this post hoc analysis, we compared the effects of filgotinib on MRI measures of structural change in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) with effects on clinical parameters.

Methods: TORTUGA was a randomized trial of 116 patients with active AS (as per modified New York classification criteria, with sacroiliitis confirmed by central reading) treated with filgotinib 200 mg (n=58) or placebo (n=58) once daily for 12 weeks. MRI scans at baseline and Week 12 (or early discontinuation) were re‑evaluated post hoc in a blinded fashion by 2 experts to determine SPARCC SIJ Structural Scores (SSS); erosion, backfill, ankylosis, and fat lesion scores. Observed changes from baseline in the SPARCC SSS measures were evaluated using analysis of covariance with factors for treatment, baseline value, and randomization stratification. Least squares mean changes from baseline and between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated; p values were nominal. Data were then compared with clinical outcomes. Pearson correlations to assess intra-subject relationships were determined for changes in structural lesions from baseline to Week 12 versus changes in C-reactive protein, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and SPARCC MRI SIJ and spine inflammation scores.

Results: Evaluable MRI scans (baseline and Week 12) were obtained from 87 patients (48 filgotinib, 39 placebo). At baseline, there were no notable differences in MRI structural lesions (erosion, backfill, ankylosis, or fat lesion scores) between filgotinib and placebo (Table 1). From baseline to Week 12, erosion scores decreased with filgotinib and increased with placebo (p=0.02 for between-group difference; Table 1). Backfill scores increased with filgotinib but not placebo (p=0.005). There were no significant between‑group differences in the change from baseline to Week 12 for ankylosis (p=0.46) or fat lesions (p=0.17) (Table 1). At Week 12, changes in erosion scores were positively correlated with changes in SPARCC MRI SIJ inflammation scores (filgotinib: r=0.35921, p=0.0132; placebo: r=0.56043, p=0.0002; Table 2), indicating that changes in inflammation and structural scores occur together in the same individual. A negative correlation was observed for backfill (filgotinib: r=–0.41479, p=0.0037; placebo: r=–0.37483, p=0.0187; Table 2). All observed correlations were moderate. Overall, significant correlations with erosion and backfill scores were not observed for other clinical endpoints, or for any clinical endpoint with ankylosis or fat lesion scores (Table 2).

Conclusion: In the 12-week TORTUGA trial, filgotinib was associated with a decrease in SIJ inflammation compared with placebo—as assessed by MRI—that correlated with a decrease in SIJ erosions and an increase in backfill.

Table 1. SPARCC SIJ SSS. CI, confidence interval; LSM, least squares mean; SD, standard deviation; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; SPARCC, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada; SSS, SIJ structural scores

Table 2. Pearson correlations between change from baseline to Week 12 in clinical and MRI inflammation endpoints and MRI structural lesions. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; R, Pearson correlation; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; SPARCC, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, CARE Arthritis Limited, 9, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Hospira, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, Orion, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; R. Landewé, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Rheumatology Consultancy BV, 1, Ablynx, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Gilead, 5, Novo Nordisk, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Schering, 2, 5, 8, TiGenix, 5; W. Barchuk, Gilead Sciences, 1, 3, AbbVie, 9, Eli Lilly, 9, Johnson & Johnson, 9; K. Liu, Gilead Sciences, 1, 3; C. Tasset, Galapagos, 1, 3; L. Gilles, Galapagos, 3; T. Hendrikx, Galapagos, 1, 3; R. Besuyen, Galapagos, 1, 3; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 5, MSD, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 5, Hexal, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Østergaard M, Landewé R, Barchuk W, Liu K, Tasset C, Gilles L, Hendrikx T, Besuyen R, Baraliakos X. Impact of Filgotinib on Structural Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints at 12 Weeks in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Correlation with Clinical Endpoints [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-filgotinib-on-structural-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-at-12-weeks-in-patients-with-active-ankylosing-spondylitis-correlation-with-clinical-endpoints/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-filgotinib-on-structural-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-at-12-weeks-in-patients-with-active-ankylosing-spondylitis-correlation-with-clinical-endpoints/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology