ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2077

Impact of Diabetes, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Use, and Statin Use on Presentation and Outcomes in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis

Jocelyn Ma1,2, Nader A. Khalidi3, Ola Wierzbicki2, Abdallah Al Qethami4, Simon Carette5 and Christian Pagnoux6, 1Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 3Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph’s Health Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 4Internal Medicine/Adult Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: ACE-inhibitors, Diabetes, giant cell arteritis, statins and temporal arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Vasculitis II: Population Studies

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Few retrospective studies in giant cell arteritis (GCA) previously reported, separately, that 1) patients with diabetes had less positive temporal artery biopsies (TAB), 2) patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) experienced fewer relapses and 3) patients on statins experienced the same frequency of clinical complications and relapses as non-exposed patients. This retrospective chart review study simultaneously investigated the impact of these 3 factors on a cohort of patients followed in 2 large North American centers.

Methods: Patient who were diagnosed with GCA were included in this study if they met the American College of Rheumatology’s (ACR) modified classification criteria (age >50 and ≥2 of the following: new onset headache, TA abnormality, ESR >40mm, abnormal TAB and large vessel vasculitis by angiogram or biopsy). Their demographics, presenting symptoms, TAB results, disease complications and outcomes (relapses, duration of glucocorticoid use) were compared between exposed (diabetes/ACE/ARB/statin) and non-exposed patients.

Results: Of 175 charts reviewed of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of GCA (between 1993-2015) seen in the 2 study centers, 137 met the ACR modified classification criteria. 70% were female and the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 71 (8.9) years. 17 patients had preexisting diabetes (11 developed diabetes after diagnosis), 36 were using ACE-Is (14 more after), 26 were using ARBs (6 more after) and 52 were on statins (15 more after). TAB was less often positive in patients with diabetes (RR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.069-0.81], p < 0.02). The cumulative probability of flaring over time was higher in both patients with pre- and post-diagnosis diabetes when compared to non-diabetic patients (log-rank, p <0.03), with adjusted HRs of 0.25 [0.10-0.62] and 0.28 [0.095-0.84], respectively. There was a significant difference in the probability of successful discontinuation of prednisone for ACE-I therapy (log-rank, p <0.03), but a nonsignificant trend for ARB therapy when compared to non-exposed patients, with adjusted HRs of 0.44 [0.22-0.87] and 0.60 [0.30-1.2] respectively. Clinical complications (Table 1) and relapse rates (log-rank test, p > 0.80, adjusted HR 0.54 (0.24-1.2)) did not significantly differ between patients on statin therapy or not.

  Diabetes Statin therapy ACE-I therapy ARB therapy
Positive temporal artery biopsy 0.24* 95% CI (0.069-0.81) 0.69 0.95 0.50
Headache 1.77 1.77* 95% CI (0.96-3.26) 1.2 1.09
Temporal artery tenderness 1.0 1.5 0.79 1.3
Jaw claudication 0.80 1.03 1.5 1.1
Upper limb claudication 0.48 0.30* 95% CI (0.081-1.1) 0.67 0.88
Lower limb claudication 0.00 0.22 0.79 0.11
Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy 2.3 1.16 1.4 0.88
Visual loss 1.6 0.95 1.2 0.49
Other large vessel manifestation 0.48 0.48* 95% CI (0.23-1.0) 1.06 0.69

Table 1. Relative risk ratios of the presenting features of giant cell arteritis * p < 0.05

Conclusion: In this study, patients with GCA and diabetes appeared more likely to have a negative TAB, and to relapse. ACE-I therapy showed an independent association with success at discontinuing prednisone. Statin therapy did not alter the clinical presentation or course of GCA. These observed findings confirm most (but not all) of those from similar, yet separate studies which explored this topic.


Disclosure: J. Ma, None; N. A. Khalidi, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; O. Wierzbicki, None; A. Al Qethami, None; S. Carette, Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 2,GlaxoSmithKline, 2; C. Pagnoux, Chemocentryx, 5,Chemocentryx, 9,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 9,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 5,Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ma J, Khalidi NA, Wierzbicki O, Al Qethami A, Carette S, Pagnoux C. Impact of Diabetes, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Use, and Statin Use on Presentation and Outcomes in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-diabetes-angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor-or-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-use-and-statin-use-on-presentation-and-outcomes-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-diabetes-angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor-or-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-use-and-statin-use-on-presentation-and-outcomes-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology