ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1892

Immunosignature Technology Differentiates Patients with Systemic Sclerosis and Internal Organ Involvement

Lorinda Chung1, David Fiorentino2, Robert Gerwien3, Kathleen Jia4, Joseph Barten Legutki3, Antonio Valenzuela Vergara4, Lisa Zhu4, Theodore M. Tarasow3 and Kathryn Sykes3, 1Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 2Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 3HealthTell, Inc, san ramon, CA, 4Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: antibodies and scleroderma-like conditions, Diagnostic Tests

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease (CTD) characterized by fibrosis, vascular complications, and inflammation affecting both skin and internal organs. Diagnosis of SSc is difficult due to the complexity of manifestations and overlap with other autoimmune (AI) diseases. Clinical classification criteria including SSc-specific autoantibodies have been developed, but disease manifestations are often advanced once patients fulfill these criteria. In addition, heterogeneity in clinical presentation, internal organ involvement, and rate of disease progression make counseling and management of each individual patient challenging. The ImmunoSignature(IMS) Technology has shown promise as a new diagnostic platform for both chronic and infectious diseases. The goal of this study was to identify specific antibody signatures that differentiate SSc patients from healthy individuals and those with other AI, as well as those SSc patients with and without particular internal organ complications.

Methods: Plasma samples from a study population of 876 subjects were evaluated; the cohort was comprised of SSc (n=301), dermatomyositis (DM) (396), mixed and undifferentiated CTD (31), polymyositis (14), systemic lupus erythematosus (8), other AI (42), and healthy controls (84). All met validated classification criteria for each specific disease. An IMS assay was used to detect plasma antibodies bound to an array of ~126,000 unique peptides. Peptide sequences were designed to broadly sample chemical space thus providing a library of diverse epitope mimetics for antibodies to selectively bind. Features most discriminating SSc contrasts were identified using a t-test. Support vector machine classifiers were trained and assessed by 100 iterations of 5-fold cross validation.

Results: Cross-validated estimates of classification performance are provided in Table 1. One classifier distinguished SSc patients from healthy donors. Additional classifiers differentiated SSc from other AI diseases or from DM in particular. Finally, SSc patients that suffered from interstitial lung disease (ILD), renal crisis, or gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) within a year of their blood draw could be distinguished from those SSc patients who did not. Up to 10,000 peptides whose antibody-binding characteristics differentiated health status groups were used as inputs to these classifiers.

Conclusion: Reproducible binding patterns produced by peripheral-blood antibody repertoires on a mimetic-peptide microarray can differentiate SSc from healthy donors and from other AI diseases. In addition, distinctive signatures were established for SSc patients with internal organ complications including ILD, renal crisis, and GAVE. This suggests that the IMS technology may be instrumental in the development of both new diagnostic and prognostic tests for SSc.

Table 1. Classification Performance Estimates of IMS for SSc Diagnosis and Prognosis
Contrast AUC Sens. @ 90% Spec. Spec. @ 90% Sens. Accuracy @ Sens. = Spec.
SSc vs Healthy 0.96 (0.95-0.97) 90% (86-94%) 91% (86-93%) 90% (88-92%)
SSc vs Other AI 0.77 (0.75-0.79) 42% (35-47%) 40% (32-47%) 70% (68-73%)
SSc vs DM 0.77 (0.74- 0.8) 40% (33-48%) 41% (33-48%) 70% (67-73%)
ILD+ vs ILD- 0.68 (0.64-0.72) 23% (13-33%) 31% (21-41%) 63% (59-68%)
Renal Crisis+ vs Crisis- 0.72 (0.60-0.82) 27% (3-53%) 42% (12-62%) 65% (55-76%)
GAVE+ vs GAVE- 0.77 (0.64-0.84) 28% (8-46%) 49% (10-67%) 69% (62-77%)

Disclosure: L. Chung, None; D. Fiorentino, None; R. Gerwien, HealthTell, Inc., 1,HealthTell, Inc., 3; K. Jia, None; J. B. Legutki, HealthTell, Inc., 1,HealthTell, Inc., 3; A. V. Vergara, None; L. Zhu, None; T. M. Tarasow, Healthtell, Inc., 3,HealthTell, Inc., 1; K. Sykes, HealthTell, Inc., 1,HealthTell, Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chung L, Fiorentino D, Gerwien R, Jia K, Legutki JB, Vergara AV, Zhu L, Tarasow TM, Sykes K. Immunosignature Technology Differentiates Patients with Systemic Sclerosis and Internal Organ Involvement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunosignature-technology-differentiates-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-and-internal-organ-involvement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunosignature-technology-differentiates-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-and-internal-organ-involvement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology