ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2124

Immunological Differences Between PsA Patients Who Are Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor-Naïve and Who Have Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Stefan Siebert1, Laura Coates2, Georg Schett3, Siba P. Raychaudhuri4, Warner Chen5, Sheng Gao5, Soumya Chakravarty6, May Shawi7, Frederic Lavie8, Elke Theander9, Marlies Neuhold10, Alexa Kollmeier11, Xie L Xu12, Proton Rahman13, Philip J Mease14 and Atul Deodhar15, 1Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Oxford, England, United Kingdom, 3Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, 4Rheumatology, Allergy, and Clinical Immunology, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, 5Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC; Drexel University College of Medicine, Villanova, PA, 7Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 8The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Paris, France, Paris, France, 9Janssen Cilag, Lund, Sweden, 10Janssen, Zug, Switzerland, 11Janssen-Cilag, Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA, 12Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA, San Marcos, CA, 13Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada, 14Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health, Seattle, WA, 15Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: PsA

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: A better understanding of the immunological differences between psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients (pts) who are tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-naïve and who have inadequate response to TNFi (TNFi-IR) may guide treatment choices. In DISCOVER-1, benefit of the IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor guselkumab (GUS) every-four-weeks (Q4W) and Q8W over placebo (PBO) in improving PsA signs and symptoms was seen in adults with active PsA.1 The Phase 3b COSMOS study of GUS Q8W vs PBO in TNFi-IR PsA pts corroborated these findings.2 We assessed baseline (BL) molecular differences between TNFi-naïve and TNFi-IR PsA pts and investigated GUS pharmacodynamic effect on cytokine expression over time in these cohorts.

Methods: Serum samples collected from consenting biomarker substudy pts in DISCOVER-11 (TNFi-naïve [n=101] and TNFi-IR [n=17]), DISCOVER-23 (TNFi-naïve [n=150]), and COSMOS2 (TNFi-IR [n=76]) were analyzed for selected serum cytokine levels. TNFi-IR pts in this post-hoc analysis had active PsA and discontinued 1-2 TNFi due to inadequate efficacy; these pts required a TNFi-specific washout period prior to starting GUS. Pharmacodynamic effect of GUS Q8W on cytokine levels was assessed. Differential BL cytokine expression, associations between BL cytokine levels and clinical response (Psoriasis [PsO] Area and Severity Index 75% improvement from BL [PASI75] and American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement [ACR20]), and GUS effect on cytokine levels were analyzed with a General linear model and Spearman linear regression.

Results: BL pt demographics, disease characteristics, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) use were comparable between TNFi-naïve (DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2, N=251) and TNFi-IR (DISCOVER-1 and COSMOS, N=93) pts, with differences in mean PASI score (8.9 v 12.5), swollen joint count (SJC) (11.7 v 10.3), PsA duration (5.8 v 9.8 years), and PsO duration (16.7 v 20.4 years; Table). BL serum IL-22 and TNFα levels for pooled treatment groups were higher in TNFi-IR than TNFi‑naïve pts (p< 0.05). At W24, GUS reduced IL-22, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum amyloid A protein to similar levels in both cohorts (p< 0.05; Figure). W24 PASI75 responders in GUS arm had higher BL IL-17F levels in both cohorts (p< 0.05) and higher IL-22 levels in TNFi-IR pts only (p< 0.05). A trend of upregulated BL IL-22 expression in W24 ACR20 responders was seen for TNFi-IR pts treated with GUS (p=0.07).

Conclusion: Elevated BL IL-22 expression and association between BL IL-22 levels and W24 PASI75 response, and a W24 trend for an association between upregulated BL IL-22 and ACR20 response, in TNFi-IR pts seen in this exploratory analysis may suggest increased involvement of the IL-23 pathway in TNFi-IR pts. GUS showed comparable and significant pharmacodynamic effects for TNFi-naïve and TNFi-IR pts, consistent with observed clinical responses.

References:
1Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25
2Coates LC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:140-1
3Mease P, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-36

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: S. Siebert, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Biogen; L. Coates, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Celgene, Biogen, Moonlake, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK); G. Schett, None; S. P. Raychaudhuri, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB; W. Chen, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson; S. Gao, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; S. Chakravarty, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Johnson & Johnson; M. Shawi, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson; F. Lavie, Janssen; E. Theander, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson; M. Neuhold, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Johnson & Johnson; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson; P. Rahman, Janssen, Novartis, AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer; P. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Sun Pharma, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Genentech; A. Deodhar, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB Pharma, Aurinia, Moonlake.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Siebert S, Coates L, Schett G, P. Raychaudhuri S, Chen W, Gao S, Chakravarty S, Shawi M, Lavie F, Theander E, Neuhold M, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Rahman P, Mease P, Deodhar A. Immunological Differences Between PsA Patients Who Are Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor-Naïve and Who Have Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunological-differences-between-psa-patients-who-are-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-naive-and-who-have-inadequate-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunological-differences-between-psa-patients-who-are-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-naive-and-who-have-inadequate-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology