ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2644

Identifying Response for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Glucocorticoid Index (SLEDAI-2KG)

Zahi Touma1, Dafna D Gladman2, Jiandong Su1, Nicole Anderson3 and Murray Urowitz2, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Glucocorticoid Index (SLEDAI-2KG) is a valid index able to measure disease activity while accounting for glucocorticoid (GC) dose SLEDAI-2KG has the same descriptors as SLEDAI-2K in addition to a new descriptor “GCs” with different weight scores based on the dose of GCs. We aimed to: 1) determine the best cut-off for SLEDAI-2KG in identifying responders, 2) compare the performance of SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG in identifying responders.

 

Methods: Patients seen between January 1995 – April 2018, at a single lupus centre, with SLEDAI-2K ≥6 and on GC ≥ 5 mg/day at baseline, and follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 9 months were studied.

Response to SoC therapy, at follow up visits were assessed by SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG. The weighted GC score is as follows: < 5mg/day = 0; 5 mg/day = 1; 7.5 mg/day = 2; 10-12.5 mg/day = 3; 15-17.5 mg/day = 4; 20-22.5 mg/day = 5; 25-30 mg/day = 6; 32.5-42.5 mg/day =7; ≥45 mg/day=8. The performances of SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG were compared using different cut-off points; 4, 5 and 6. Descriptive statistics and McNemar’s tests for paired responses at the same time point and level were performed in the analysis. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for patients on GC ≥10 mg/day. To gain insight on the decrease of SLEDAI-2KG scores, we evaluated SLEDAI-2K scores and GCs weighted scores change on follow up visits.

 

Results: Of the 247 patients, 86.2% female, 47.9% Caucasian, 19.7% Black, 15.4% Asian, 17.0% other.  The mean age at SLE diagnosis was 31.0 ± 13.0 and mean age at baseline was 35.7 ± 13.4 years.  SLE duration was 9.02 ± 7.74 years. Mean SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG at baseline was 13.8 ± 6.9 and 19.3 ± 7.8 respectively. The mean GC dose at baseline was 28.6 ± 19.7 mg/day.

The results confirmed that a cut-off of 5 is the best for SLEDAI-2KG in identifying responders and SLEDAI-2KG identified more responders at 3, 6 and 9 months in patients taking ≥5 mg and ≥10 mg/day of GCs (table 1).

The decrease in SLEDAI-2KG scores on follow-up is the result of decrease in the scores of its components SLEDAI-2K and GCs weighted scores. Figure 1 illustrates the mean SLEDAI-2KG scores and its component scores including both the SLEDAI-2K component and the weighted GC dose at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months follow-up.

 

Conclusion: The cut-off 5 is the most appropriate to identify responders by SLEDAI-2KG. Also, SLEDAI-2KG, is superior to SLEDAI-2K in identifying responders at 3, 6 and 9 months in patients taking ≥5 and ≥10 mg/day of GCs. The decrease of SLEDAI-2KG scores resulted from the decrease of its components-SLEDAI-2K scores and the weighted scores of GC.

 

Table 1. Responders by SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG at 3, 6 and 9 months after baseline using different cut-offs

Index Point Reduction

Baseline GC dose  ≥5 mg/day  (N=188)

SLEDAI-2K (%)

SLEDAI-2KG (%)

McNemar’s Agreementtest(p values)

3 MONTHS

 

 

 

4 Point Reduction

113 (60.1)

110 (58.5)

–

5 Point Reduction

87 (46.3)

99 (52.7)

0.0143

6 Point Reduction

85 (45.2)

90 (47.9)

–

6 MONTHS

 

 

 

4 Point Reduction

126 (67.0)

125 (66.5)

–

5 Point Reduction

 103 (54.8)

113 (60.1)

0.025

6 Point Reduction

101 (53.7)

105 (55.9)

–

9 MONTHS

 

 

 

4 Point Reduction

143 (76.1)

149 (79.3)

 

5 Point Reduction

112 (59.6)

133 (70.7)

<0.001

6 Point Reduction

108 (57.5)

122 (64.9)

0.004

 


Disclosure: Z. Touma, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; D. D. Gladman, Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 2,Amgen, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 5; J. Su, None; N. Anderson, None; M. Urowitz, GlaxoSmithKline, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Gladman DD, Su J, Anderson N, Urowitz M. Identifying Response for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Glucocorticoid Index (SLEDAI-2KG) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-response-for-the-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-disease-activity-glucocorticoid-index-sledai-2kg/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-response-for-the-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-disease-activity-glucocorticoid-index-sledai-2kg/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology