ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 111

Identifying Groups At Increased Risk Of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Family History and Genetic Risk Scores

Jeffrey A. Sparks1, Chia-Yen Chen2, Xia Jiang3, Johan Askling4, Linda T. Hiraki5, Lars Klareskog6, Lars Alfredsson3, Karen H. Costenbader7 and Elizabeth W. Karlson1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 3Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 5Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 7Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pathogenesis, prevention, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The identification of high risk groups is crucial for RA prevention strategies. Individuals with family history (FH) of autoimmunity are at increased risk for RA. Genetic markers have been associated with RA and genetic risk scores (GRS) have incorporated these markers for RA risk. We aimed to identify groups at increased risk of RA using FH and GRS.

Methods: We investigated the association between FH and GRS and risk of RA in a nested case-control study in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and replicated in the Epidemiological Investigation of RA (EIRA). RA cases in NHS were validated by chart review and matched to controls. In EIRA, RA cases at diagnosis were matched to controls. All cases satisfied the 1987 ACR criteria for RA classification and were Caucasian. FH data were obtained from questionnaires (FH of RA or lupus for NHS) and registries (FH of RA for EIRA). Serologic status was defined as +RF/ACPA for NHS and by +ACPA for EIRA. Weighted genetic risk scores (GRS-HLA using 8 HLA shared epitope alleles, and GRS-39 using 8 HLA shared epitope alleles and 31 SNPs associated with RA) were calculated based on prior studies. GRS were dichotomized as high or low based on the 75th percentile of the GRS in controls. The joint effect of low/high GRS and no/any FH was examined using logistic regression models adjusted for matching factors and confounders (age, sex, smoking pack-years, body mass index, alcohol intake, education, parity, and occupational exposures) to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all, seropositive/ACPA+, and seronegative/ACPA- RA, with the reference of low GRS and no FH.

Results: We analyzed 492 cases and 501 controls among women in NHS and 1,752 cases and 1,361 controls among men and women in EIRA with available FH data. Compared to low GRS-HLA/no FH, the OR for high GRS-HLA and +FH was 8.56 (95% CI 3.87-18.93) in NHS and 6.17 (95% CI 3.86-9.85) in EIRA for all RA (Table 1). The OR for high GRS-39 and +FH was 6.63 (95% CI 3.30-13.31) in NHS and 8.24 (95% CI 4.64-14.64) in EIRA for all RA compared to low GRS-39/no FH (Table 2). There were no significant multiplicative interactions between GRS-HLA or GRS-39 and FH.

Conclusion: Using genetic risk scores and family history, we have identified groups at increased risk of developing RA. Genetic risk scores utilizing only HLA shared epitope alleles performed similarly to genetic risk scores incorporating a larger set of genetic markers for RA. Genetic testing, particularly HLA shared epitope alleles, among those with family history may identify groups at increased risk for RA.

Table 1. Joint effect of family history (FH) and GRS-HLA for RA phenotypes in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Epidemiological Investigation of RA (EIRA) study.

Low GRS-HLA

High GRS-HLA

FH

Cases / controls

OR (95% CI)

Cases / controls

OR (95% CI)

NHS

All RA

None
Any

252 / 367
78 / 30

1.0 (Ref)
4.04 (2.54-6.56)

120 / 96
42 / 8

1.84 (1.33-2.56)
8.56 (3.87-18.93)

Seropositive RA

None
Any

140 / 367
41 / 30

1.0 (Ref)
3.93 (2.28-6.86)

72 / 96
23 / 8

1.93 (1.31-2.84)
7.59 (3.17-18.16)

Seronegative RA

None
Any

112 / 367
37 / 30

1.0 (Ref)
4.41 (2.55-7.73)

48 / 96
19 / 8

1.72 (1.12-2.61)
10.17 (4.16-24.88)

EIRA

All RA

None
Any

580 / 783
39 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
1.98 (1.18-3.32)

1013 / 528
120 / 23

2.28 (1.95-2.76)
6.17 (3.86-9.85)

ACPA+ RA

None
Any

214 / 783
22 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
3.04 (1.66-5.55)

699 / 528
93 / 23

4.32 (3.54-5.27)
13.20 (8.03-21.71)

ACPA- RA

None
Any

366 / 783
17 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
1.34 (0.71-2.54)

314 / 528
27 /23

1.16 (0.96-1.41)
9.50 (3.95-22.83)

All models are adjusted for age, smoking pack-years, body mass index, alcohol intake, education, and parity. EIRA models are also adjusted for sex and occupational exposures.

 

Table 2. Joint effect of family history (FH) and GRS-39 for RA phenotypes in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Epidemiological Investigation of RA (EIRA) study.

Low GRS-39

High GRS-39

FH

Cases / controls

OR (95% CI)

Cases / controls

OR (95% CI)

NHS

All RA

None
Any

240 / 349
72 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
4.26 (2.63-7.07)

132 / 114
48 / 11

1.65 (1.20-2.27)
6.63 (3.30-13.31)

Seropositive RA

None
Any

129 / 349
35 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
4.09 (2.29-7.39)

83 / 114
29 / 11

1.94 (1.33-2.82)
6.73 (3.12-14.52)

Seronegative RA

None
Any

111 / 349
37 / 27

1.0 (Ref)
4.77 (2.72-8.48)

49 / 114
19 / 11

1.33 (0.87-2.02)
6.39 (2.86-14.30)

EIRA

All RA

None
Any

826 / 984
56 / 36

1.0 (Ref)
1.70 (1.09-2.66)

767 / 327
103 / 14

2.43 (2.06-2.87)
8.24 (4.64-14.64)

ACPA+ RA

None
Any

370 / 984
35 / 36

1.0 (Ref)
2.43 (1.47-4.01)

543 / 327
80 / 14

3.86 (3.18-4.68)
14.20 (7.82-25.75)

ACPA- RA

None
Any

456 / 984
21 / 36

1.0 (Ref)
1.17 (0.67-2.07)

224 / 327
23 / 14

1.32 (1.07-1.62)
3.65 (1.83-7.26)

All models are adjusted for age, smoking pack-years, body mass index, alcohol intake, education, and parity. EIRA models are also adjusted for sex and occupational exposures.


Disclosure:

J. A. Sparks,
None;

C. Y. Chen,
None;

X. Jiang,
None;

J. Askling,

Pfizer Inc,

2;

L. T. Hiraki,
None;

L. Klareskog,

No own commercial interests,

2;

L. Alfredsson,
None;

K. H. Costenbader,
None;

E. W. Karlson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-groups-at-increased-risk-of-developing-rheumatoid-arthritis-using-family-history-and-genetic-risk-scores/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology