ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1712

Identification Of Factors Associated With Agreement Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Electronic Medication Lists and Prescribed Disease Modifying Treatment Plans

Ilinca D. Metes1, Heather Eng2, June Feng2, G.K. Balasubramani3, Stephen R. Wisniewski3 and Marc C. Levesque4, 1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Epidemiology Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, Electronic Health Record, meaningful use, mediation and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Federal government programs incentivize the use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) including accurate medication lists.  The accuracy of a patient’s EHR medication list is essential for understanding the efficacy of treatment plans and reducing adverse events.  However, studies indicate that many EHR medication lists are inaccurate.  Therefore, it was our aim to determine the level of agreement and to determine the factors associated with agreement between a RA patient’s EHR medication list and their disease modifying treatment plan.

Methods: Subjects (n = 1,029) were drawn from the University of Pittsburgh RA Comparative Effectiveness Research (RACER) registry (2010-13).  For each outpatient visit (n = 5,236) a “Gold Standard” medication list (encompassing oral disease modifying anti-rheumatic disease modifying drugs (DMARDS), biologics, and corticosteroids) was created using retrospective (n = 4,251) and prospective (n = 985) data collected through chart review of physician notes and/or patient interviews.  The “Gold Standard” was compared to the EHR medication list and the measure of agreement was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.  Patient, physician and clinic characteristics were compared between visits where medications matched vs visits where medications did not match using chi square for categorical variables and t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests for continuous measures.  To evaluate the characteristics associated with drug matches, a longitudinal regression model using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) method was used to account for repeated observations within a patient.

Results: Comparison of the “Gold Standard” and EHR medication lists resulted in 8,124 true positive, 95,984 true negative, 638 false positive, and 1,829 false negative medication matches.  Retrospective (kappa = 0.86) and prospective (kappa = 0.85) data was combined to give an overall kappa = 0.86, with oral DMARDS having a kappa = 0.89, biologics a kappa = 0.85, and corticosteroids a kappa = 0.78.  Based on the GEE, the odds ratio (OR; 95% CI) of oral DMARD, biologic and corticosteroid medication matches was decreased by having a longer prescription list (0.94; 0.93-0.96), a high % decrease in medications compared to the last visit (0.97; 0.97-0.98), having high RA disease activity by the RAPID3 (0.38; 0.29-0.51), CDAI (0.32; 0.25-0.42), or DAS28 (0.76; 0.72-0.81), and having more comorbidities as measured by the Charlson (0.90; 0.83-0.97).

Conclusion: For RA patients in a usual care setting, there was a high level of agreement between their disease modifying drug treatment plan and their EHR medication list, with the level of agreement differing slightly between oral DMARDs, biologics and corticosteroids.  A longer medication list, a high % decrease in overall medications since the last visit, being in high disease activity by the RAPID3, CDAI, or DAS28, and having more comorbidities as measured by the Charlson increased the likelihood of drug discrepancies. Using these results, our future research will focus on reducing discrepancies in the EHR medication list by implementing targeted interventions.


Disclosure:

I. D. Metes,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2;

H. Eng,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2;

J. Feng,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2;

G. K. Balasubramani,
None;

S. R. Wisniewski,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2;

M. C. Levesque,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-factors-associated-with-agreement-between-rheumatoid-arthritis-electronic-medication-lists-and-prescribed-disease-modifying-treatment-plans/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology