ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 200

Hydroxychloroquine Use Among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients In An Academic Rheumatology Practice

James G. Miceli1 and Harry D. Fischer2, 1Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: hydroxychloroquine and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a mainstay in the current treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). HCQ has been shown to reduce the incidence of SLE flares, reduce the risk of irreversible end-organ damage, and improve survival in SLE patients. Yet, few studies have been devoted to examining its prevalence of use. Prior papers have either examined HCQ use as a secondary endpoint (56-64%) or as a primary endpoint in a community practice (55%). Our study aims to identify the prevalence of HCQ use in an urban academic rheumatology practice and to identify the reasons for nonuse.

Methods: A search of medical records with a diagnostic code for systemic lupus erythematosus (710.0) was performed for patients seen within a three-month period (September 1 – December 1, 2011) at Beth Israel Medical Center’s rheumatology clinic. Charts for 211 patients were reviewed for active use of HCQ; if the patient was not on HCQ, the chart was further reviewed and an explanation for nonuse was documented if present.

Results: A total of 161 out of 211 SLE subjects (76.3%) were found to be actively using hydroxychloroquine. Among nonusers, 21 (42%) did not have a definitive diagnosis of SLE; 9 (18%) were either non-compliant or refused treatment; 6 (12%) had an allergy or intolerance to HCQ; 6 (12%) were not taking HCQ for unclear reasons but were asymptomatic; 4 (8%) reported a history of HCQ-induced oculotoxicity; and 2 (4%) developed thrombocytopenia presumed secondary to HCQ (Figure 1).

Conclusion: The use of HCQ in SLE patients at our institution exceeded rates of use reported elsewhere. Nonetheless, almost ¼ of potential candidates for treatment were not prescribed HCQ. Almost half of the non-prescribed patients lacked a definitive diagnosis of SLE. The majority of the other non-takers had a documented explanation.  Our results help to better define reasons for nonuse of HCQ in patients with SLE. It is hoped that recognition of these factors could help to further increase the use of HCQ in SLE patients.


Disclosure:

J. G. Miceli,
None;

H. D. Fischer,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hydroxychloroquine-use-among-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-in-an-academic-rheumatology-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology