ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3134

Hydroxychloroquine Is Not Effective in Reducing Symptoms of Hand Osteoarthritis: Results from a Placebo-Controlled Randomised Trial

Sarah R. Kingsbury1, Puvan Tharmanathan2, Ada Keding3, Sarah Ronaldson3, Andrew Grainger4, Richard J. Wakefield5, Catherine Arundel3, Fraser Birrell6, Michael Doherty7, Tonia Vincent8, Fiona E Watt9, Krysia Dziedzic10, Terence W. O'Neill11, Nigel K Arden12, David L Scott13, John Dickson14, Toby Garrood15, Michael Green16,17, Ajit Menon18, Tom Sheeran19, David Torgerson3 and Philip G. Conaghan4, 1Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2University of York, York, United Kingdom, 3Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom, 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 6Institute for Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 7Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Great Britain, 8University of Oxford, London, Great Britain, 9Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 10Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, 11Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester, United Kingdom, 12Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 13Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 14South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, 15Rheumatology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 16York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom, 17Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, United Kingdom, 18Haywood Hospital, Stoke-On-Trent, United Kingdom, 19Cannock Chase Hospital, Cannock, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Hydroxychloroquine, osteoarthritis and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspect II: Treatment and Imaging

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose:  Synovitis is prevalent in OA and associated with pain. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used routinely for treating synovitis in inflammatory arthritis. The primary aim of the HERO RCT was to determine the effectiveness of HCQ as an analgesic treatment for hand OA, and secondarily to determine if synovitis was associated with treatment response, effects on structural progression and cost-effectiveness.

Methods:  248 participants with symptomatic (VAS pain ≥4/10) and radiographic hand OA recruited across UK primary and secondary care were randomized to HCQ or placebo for 12 months. Daily HCQ dose ranged from 200-400 mg according to ideal body weight. The primary endpoint was average hand pain during the previous 2 weeks (numerical rating scale, NRS) at six months. Secondary endpoints included other self-reported pain and function (NRS and VAS scales, AUSCAN), grip strength, quality-of-life measures (OAQol, SF-12) and radiographic structural change (on Kallman score) at 12 months. The effects of baseline radiographic severity were also assessed. In a sub-study, n=143 participants had ultrasound performed at baseline on small joints of a single hand. Longitudinal mixed models compared changes between groups. Analyses were conducted on intention-to-treat basis. A health economics analysis was also performed.

Results:  Follow-up was 84.7% at 6 months and 76.6% at 12 months. The mean initial HCQ dose for the intervention arm (n= 114) was 320 mg. At the primary endpoint, the treatment difference estimate between HCQ and Placebo was -0.16 points on the NRS pain scale (95% CI: -0.72 to 0.41, p=0.584, Table 1). There were no significant treatment differences at 3, 6 or 12 months for any secondary outcomes including radiographic outcomes (Table 1). Baseline structural damage did not affect response to HCQ. On ultrasound, 94% had ≥1 joint positive for greyscale synovitis, 59% were Power Doppler positive; synovitis did not impact on treatment group differences. The economic analysis found that HCQ was less costly but produced a smaller quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain than placebo, saving £6,545 per QALY lost, and was not considered to be cost-effective.

Conclusion:  HCQ was not more effective than placebo in reducing symptoms or radiographic progression in people selected for moderate to severe hand pain and radiographic OA; HCQ is therefore not recommended for this patient group. Given the analgesic benefits of other anti-inflammatory therapies, these findings may reflect the mild anti-inflammatory action of HCQ, differing drug effects on certain OA pathologies, and also inclusion criteria in hand OA trials. Table 1: Adjusted group means and differences from longitudinal mixed models

 

HCQ

Mean (95% CI)

Placebo

Mean (95% CI)

Between-group Difference

(95% CI)

Hand Pain NRS (Primary endpoint at 6 months)
3 months

5.52 (5.00, 6.04)

5.76 (5.25, 6.28)

0.24 (-0.30, 0.79)

6 months

5.64 (5.11, 6.16)

5.48 (4.95, 6.01)

-0.16 (-0.72, 0.41)

12 months

5.36 (4.81, 5.90)

5.50 (4.96, 6.03)

0.14 (-0.44, 0.72)

AUSCAN Pain
3 months

11.29 (10.48, 12.09)

11.23 (10.43, 12.03)

-0.06 (-0.90, 0.78)

6 months

11.13 (10.32, 11.95)

11.00 (10.18, 11.82)

-0.14 (-1.00, 0.73)

12 months

10.92 (10.09, 11.76)

10.39 (9.56, 11.21)

-0.54 (1.43, 0.36)

AUSCAN Function
3 months

19.76 (18.34, 21.18)

20.15 (18.75, 21.56)

0.40 (-1.08, 1.88)

6 months

19.72 (18.28, 21.15)

19.33 (17.89, 20.76)

-0.39 (-1.91, 1.14)

12 months

19.81 (18.33, 21.29)

19.02 (17.57, 20.47)

-0.79 (-2.37, 0.78)

Grip Strength (right hand, in lbs)
6 months

37.34 (33.71, 40.97)

37.25 (33.63, 40.88)

-0.09 (-3.87, 3.69)

12 months

36.79 (33.08, 40.50)

38.89 (35.24, 42.54)

2.10 (-1.80, 5.99)

Osteoarthritis Quality of Life (OAQoL)
6 months

8.56 (7.22, 9.90)

8.81 (7.48, 10.15)

0.25 (-1.11, 1.62)

12 months

8.92 (7.55, 10.30)

9.56 (8.21, 10.92)

0.64 (-0.79, 2.06)

SF-12 Physical Component Score
6 months

39.61 (37.50, 41.73)

39.65 (37.54, 41.77)

0.04 (-2.16, 2.24)

12 months

38.30 (36.11, 40.49)

40.53 (38.40, 42.66)

2.23 (-0.06, 4.51)

SF-12 Mental Component Score
6 months

51.54 (49.39, 53.70)

52.24 (50.10, 54.38)

0.70 (-1.59, 2.98)

12 months

53.17 (50.93, 55.41)

52.00 (49.83, 54.16)

-1.17 (-3.55, 1.21)

Total Kallman Score
12 months

48.21 (47.39, 49.03)

48.33 (47.53, 49.13)

0.12 (-0.72, 0.97)


Disclosure: S. R. Kingsbury, None; P. Tharmanathan, None; A. Keding, None; S. Ronaldson, None; A. Grainger, Medivir AB; GE Medical, 5; R. J. Wakefield, None; C. Arundel, None; F. Birrell, None; M. Doherty, AstraZeneca, 2,AstraZeneca; Nordic Biosciences; Roche, 5; T. Vincent, None; F. E. Watt, Astellas, 5,Arthritis Research UK, 2,Arthritis Research UK; James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership, 6; K. Dziedzic, None; T. W. O'Neill, None; N. K. Arden, None; D. L. Scott, None; J. Dickson, None; T. Garrood, None; M. Green, None; A. Menon, None; T. Sheeran, None; D. Torgerson, None; P. G. Conaghan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kingsbury SR, Tharmanathan P, Keding A, Ronaldson S, Grainger A, Wakefield RJ, Arundel C, Birrell F, Doherty M, Vincent T, Watt FE, Dziedzic K, O'Neill TW, Arden NK, Scott DL, Dickson J, Garrood T, Green M, Menon A, Sheeran T, Torgerson D, Conaghan PG. Hydroxychloroquine Is Not Effective in Reducing Symptoms of Hand Osteoarthritis: Results from a Placebo-Controlled Randomised Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hydroxychloroquine-is-not-effective-in-reducing-symptoms-of-hand-osteoarthritis-results-from-a-placebo-controlled-randomised-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hydroxychloroquine-is-not-effective-in-reducing-symptoms-of-hand-osteoarthritis-results-from-a-placebo-controlled-randomised-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology