ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 52

How Young People with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Their Caregivers Weigh the Risks of the Disease and its Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study

Daniel B. Horton1,2, Jomaira Salas3, Aleksandra Wec4, Timothy Beukelman5,6, Alexis Boneparth1, Ky Haverkamp7, Melanie Kohlheim8, Melissa Mannion5, Nandini Moorthy1, Sarah Ringold9 and Marsha Rosenthal2, 1Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, 2Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick, NJ, 3Department of Sociology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 4Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 5Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 6Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 8Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network, Cincinnati, OH, 9Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2017 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

Keywords: juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), medication, qualitative and remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017

Title: Clinical and Therapeutic Poster Session

Session Type: Abstract Submissions

Session Time: 5:30PM-7:00PM

Background/Purpose: Prior research has examined factors important to clinicians in deciding whether to withdraw therapy for inactive JIA, but little is known about the perspectives of patients and families confronted with these decisions. We studied how patients with JIA and caregivers consider whether to continue or stop treatment for well-controlled JIA.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews of patients with JIA (age 13 years and older) and caregivers of children with JIA in the US. Participants were purposively chosen among those who completed a preliminary online survey about demographics and medical history. Interviews included questions about experiences with JIA, medicines for JIA, and factors that influenced decision-making around treatment for active and inactive disease. Interviews were transcribed and independently coded by two researchers; coding was reviewed for consistency and accuracy by two other investigators. Another investigator conducted data triangulation for corroboration. Thematic analysis drew upon the common-sense model of self-regulation to categorize and compare emergent themes.

Results: We interviewed a diverse group of 20 patients (10 age under 18) and 24 caregivers (11 parents of children age under 11) (Table). Key themes revolved around perceived risks, fears, and threats. These concerns applied both to having JIA on the one hand and to taking medicines on the other hand: symptoms versus side effects; long-term damage (existing or feared); interference in school, work, and activities by disease, infusions, or side effects; and emotional burdens and behavioral problems from having JIA versus taking medicines. How participants balanced these competing risks related to past and ongoing experiences as well as concerns about long-term effects, the latter mainly among parents and adults with JIA. Coping strategies, disease state and duration, uncertainty and unpredictability, and trust in the rheumatology team were key modifying factors.

Conclusion: For patients and parents, decisions around withdrawing JIA medicines revolve around a trade-off between risks and fears of medicines and risks and fears of the disease itself. Balancing these risks and fears is influenced strongly by negative prior experiences and complications of JIA or its treatment as well as perceived threats of long-term damage. Clinicians’ awareness of this trade-off may help improve shared decision-making around withdrawing treatment for inactive JIA.

Table. Characteristics of interview participants

Self-reported characteristics

N (%)

Demographics and geography

Group

  Patient, Ages 13-17 years old

10 (23%)

  Patient, Ages 18 and older (range 18-38)

10 (23%)

  Parent, Child 10 and younger

11 (25%)

  Parent, Child older than 10

13 (30%)

Patient sex, female

35 (80%)

Latino ethnicity

10 (23%)

Non-white race

6 (14%)

Public insurance

10 (23%)

Maximum level of education of parent

  High school

4 (9%)

  College

21 (47%)

  Graduate school

19 (43%)

Region of US

  Midwest

9 (20%)

  Northeast

8 (18%)

  South

19 (43%)

  West

8 (18%)

Disease and medication experience

JIA category

  Oligoarticular JIA

11 (25%)

  Polyarticular JIA

18 (41%)

  Psoriatic JIA

4 (9%)

  Enthesitis-related arthritis

5 (11%)

  Systemic JIA

5 (11%)

  Other

1 (2%)

Uveitis

9 (20%)

Methotrexate use

  None

7 (16%)

  Prior

17 (39%)

  Current

20 (45%)

Biologic use

  None

7 (16%)

  Prior

5 (11%)

  Current

32 (73%)

History of inactive JIA and treatment discontinuation

  Never inactive

10 (23%)

  Never stopped, inactive before

2 (5%)

  Never stopped, inactive now

11 (25%)

  Stopped, now active

12 (27%)

  Stopped, now inactive

9 (20%)


Disclosure: D. B. Horton, None; J. Salas, None; A. Wec, None; T. Beukelman, None; A. Boneparth, None; K. Haverkamp, None; M. Kohlheim, None; M. Mannion, None; N. Moorthy, None; S. Ringold, None; M. Rosenthal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Horton DB, Salas J, Wec A, Beukelman T, Boneparth A, Haverkamp K, Kohlheim M, Mannion M, Moorthy N, Ringold S, Rosenthal M. How Young People with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Their Caregivers Weigh the Risks of the Disease and its Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 4). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-young-people-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-and-their-caregivers-weigh-the-risks-of-the-disease-and-its-treatment-a-mixed-methods-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-young-people-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-and-their-caregivers-weigh-the-risks-of-the-disease-and-its-treatment-a-mixed-methods-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology