ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1306

How well  Do Patients with Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis Tolerate Methotrexate? A Retrospective Review of Discontinuation Data From a Large UK Cohort

Calum T. Goudie1, John D. Fitzpatrick1, Anshuman P. Malaviya2 and Andrew J. Ostor2, 1University of Cambridge Medical School, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Due to its efficacy and safety, methotrexate (MTX) has become the first-line disease-modifying drug for rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Although  deemed  safe, few studies have analysed  MTX  tolerability. The objective of our study was to ascertain the proportion of RA and PsA patients that discontinue MTX and  the reasons for this.

Methods: A retrospective review of the Rheumatology departments electronic database  was undertaken to identify all patients who had received MTX for RA or PsA. This was followed by review of both the electronic and paper records to identify patients in whom MTX had been discontinued.  The reasons for  this were then classified into several categories. Every effort was made to ensure that the correct reasons for drug withdrawal were documented.  Discrepancies were discussed with a senior member of the team. Cases with insufficient data were excluded from the final analysis.

Results: 1257 patients on MTX were identified. Of these 762 had  RA and 193 had PsA. MTX had been stopped in 260 patients with RA and 71 patients with PsA. In RA patients, the mean dose at the time of discontinuation of MTX was 14.1mg/week (dose range 5 – 30mg, SD 5.6mg) and in PsA patients 13.6mg/week (dose range 5 – 25mg, SD 5.0mg) (missing data in 80 and 26 patients respectively). The reasons for discontinuation and differences between the rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis groups are highlighted in Table 1 & 2. Our data suggests that about a third of patients with RA and PsA eventually stop methotrexate, most of whom cite intolerance as a reason. In addition  a statistically significant difference between the  RA and PsA cohorts was seen, with abnormalities in blood counts (leucopenia and thrombocytopenia)  being reported more frequently in RA patients (11.5% vs 6.8%; p<0.05) and  more PsA patients having  liver enzyme abnormalities (27% vs 12%; p<0.05).

Table 1: Reasons for methotrexate discontinuation in patients with RA and PsA

Reason for discontinuation

RA (% of all withdrawals)

PsA (% of all withdrawals)

p-value (Χ2-test)

Adverse events

200 (77.5)

44 (62.0)

0.4430

Ineffective

32 (12.4)

13 (18.3)

0.2061

No longer indicated

17 (6.6)

1 (1.4)

–

Patient choice

13(5.0)

10 (14.1)

0.0117

No reason stated

14 (5.4)

6 (8.5)

0.4168

 Table 2: Side-effects leading to methotrexate discontinuation

 

RA (% of all withdrawals)

n=260

PSA (% of all withdrawals)

n=71

p-value

(Χ2-test)

All gastrointestinal symptoms

   Nausea

   Oral ulceration

   Diarrhoea

   Vomiting

   Abdominal pain

   Tenesmus

65 (32.5)

41 (20.5)

12 (6.0)

6 (3.0)

4 (2.0)

2 (1.0)

1 (0.5)

12 (27.3)

7 (15.9)

1 (2.3)

3 (6.8)

2 (4.5)

3 (6.8)

0 (0.0)

0.93

All respiratory symptoms

   Shortness of breath

   Cough

   Chest infection

50 (25.0)

19 (9.5)

10 (5.0)

11 (5.5)

6 (13.6)

4 (9.1)

2 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

0.68

Abnormal LFT

24 (12.0)

12 (27.3)

0.029 *

Abnormal FBC

   Neutropenia

   Thrombocytopenia

23 (11.5)

11 (5.5)

11 (5.5)

3 (6.8)

1 (2.3)

3 (6.8)

 

Non-specifically unwell

21 (10.5)

5 (11.4)

 

Neurological and psychological

   Headache

   Dizzyness

16 (8.0)

6 (3.0)

5 (2.5)

3 (6.8)

1 (2.3)

1 (2.3)

 

Fatigue

12 (6.0)

3 (6.8)

 

Cutaneous

   Rash

   Nodulosis

11 (5.5)

8 (4.0)

3 (1.5)

2 (4.5)

2 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

 

Renal dysfunction

3 (1.5)

0 (0.0)

 

Alopecia

2 (1.0)

1 (2.3)

 

Miscellaneous AEs

7 (3.5)

6 (13.6)

 

Non-specific intolerance

19 (9.5)

5 (11.4)

 

Conclusion: Our  data  demonstrates that although MTX is safe, it is not well  tolerated. The differences between MTX tolerability in RA and PsA  is likely to be disease rather than therapy specific. We were  unable to characterise patients who suffer from  side-effects but continue therapy. Thus , the magnitude of the problem is likely to be substantially greater. Poor tolerability is also likely to impact on adherence and in these patients biologic therapy may be indicated.


Disclosure:

C. T. Goudie,
None;

J. D. Fitzpatrick,
None;

A. P. Malaviya,
None;

A. J. Ostor,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-well-do-patients-with-rheumatoid-and-psoriatic-arthritis-tolerate-methotrexate-a-retrospective-review-of-discontinuation-data-from-a-large-uk-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology