ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1840

How Good a Job Are We Rheumatologists Doing in Screening for Hepatitis B and C before Immuno-Suppressive/s Initiation in SLE?

Chandrahasa Annem1, Joel A. Block2 and Meenakshi Jolly3, 1RHEUMATOLOGY, RUSH UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, IL, 2Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Hepatitis C, SLE and immunosuppressants

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Hepatitis B & C
viral infections are widely prevalent and the potential of immunosuppressive
medications (ISM) to exacerbate an underlying viral infection is well reported.
Established guidelines are poorly defined regarding Hepatitis B and C screening
prior to initiation of ISM, and may result in (a) physician practice
variations, (b) missed opportunities for optimal health care and outcomes, and
(c) complicate management plans for patients in need of ISM. We sought to
better understand existing practices for viral hepatitis screening, and study
the prevalence and correlates of Hepatitis B and C screening among Systemic
Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients on ISM.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review
of 100 SLE patients receiving ISM and being followed in outpatient rheumatology
clinics. Data collected included demographics, total number, name and current
dose of ISMs being currently used, and if testing (and results) for Hepatitis B
and C was ordered prior to ISM initiation. ISM use was defined as current use
of any ISM including corticosteroids (CS). Significant ISM use was defined as
current use of prednisone > 7.5 mg/day along with an ISM other than hydroxychloroquine. Descriptive statistics were obtained.
Chi square test were used to compare discrete variables, while t tests were
used to compare continuous variables. Mann –Whitney test was used when
data was not normally distributed. P value < 0.05 was considered significant
on two tailed tests.

Results: 86% were women and the mean (SD) age was
27.9 ± 4 years. Forty one percent of patients were taking one ISM, 41% were on
two and 19% were on three ISMs’. Nearly half of the patients were on CS with a
median dose of 5 mg/day. Hepatitis B & C screening tests were performed in
34% and 33% patients respectively. All the patients tested for Hepatitis B
Surface Antigen (HBS Ag) were negative. Of those tested, 12/29 had Hepatitis B
Surface Antibody (HBS Ab), 2/29 Hepatitis B core
Antibody (HBc Ab) &
1/33 had Hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab). Screening
tests were offered more frequently to younger patients, those on more than one
ISM, those on CS and those on significant ISM. Among those
on significant ISM, 47% were screened for HBS Ag, as compared to 22% of
patients not on significant ISM (p=0.007). Likewise, 47% on significant ISM
were screened for HCV Ab as compared to 20% not on
significant ISM (p=0.004).

Conclusion: Less than 40% of those on ISM received
Hepatitis B & C screening in SLE. Less than half of SLE patients that
were tested prior to ISM showed immunity against Hepatitis B virus.
 Nearly 7% of SLE patients tested for Hepatitis B before ISM, showed
chronic Hepatitis B, while 3% of SLE patients tested positive for Hepatitis C
virus before ISM. These results indicate opportunities to improve screening and
detect Hepatitis B/C in SLE patients on ISM. Education of physicians treating
patients at higher risk and harmonization of various recommendations on
Hepatitis B and C screening is indicated.


Disclosure: C. Annem, None; J. A. Block, Gilead, Inc, 1,Novartis, Genentech, Hoffman‐LaRoche, Abbvie, Pfizer, Forest Research Institute, Glaxo‐SmithKline, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Novartis, Genentech, Hoffman‐LaRoche, Abbvie, Pfizer, Forest Research Institute, Glaxo‐SmithKline, 7,inPractice Resources LLC (Textbook Chapter) American Physician Institute, Inc (Board Review Lectures), 9; M. Jolly, Pfizer Inc, 7.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Annem C, Block JA, Jolly M. How Good a Job Are We Rheumatologists Doing in Screening for Hepatitis B and C before Immuno-Suppressive/s Initiation in SLE? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-good-a-job-are-we-rheumatologists-doing-in-screening-for-hepatitis-b-and-c-before-immuno-suppressives-initiation-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-good-a-job-are-we-rheumatologists-doing-in-screening-for-hepatitis-b-and-c-before-immuno-suppressives-initiation-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology