ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1162

How Ehealth Technologies Are Changing the Office Visit: Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals in Rheumatology

Graham Macdonald1, Anne F. Townsend2, Linda Li3, Sheila Kerr4, Paul Adam5, Michael McDonald6 and Catherine L. Backman7, 1Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, exeter, United Kingdom, 3Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Richmond, BC, Canada, 5Mary Pack Arthritis Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6W.Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: eHealth ethics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Education - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: eHealth is a broad term referring to the application of information and communication technologies in the health sector, ranging from health records to telemedicine and multiple forms of health education, support, and tools. By providing increased and anytime access to information, opportunities to exchange experiences with others, and self-management support, eHealth has been heralded as transformational, creating informed, engaged, and empowered “patients as partners,” equipped to take part in shared decision-making, and effectively self-manage chronic illness.1 The objective of our study is to examine how eHealth affects patient-provider relationships, and its ethical and practical ramifications.

Methods: We interviewed healthcare professionals (HCPs) about their experiences with eHealth and its impact on the office visit. Eligible participants had a caseload with >25% of patients with arthritis and multi-morbidity, in order to address issues of managing complex chronic conditions and coordination of care. In-depth interviews used a flexible, semi-structured discussion guide, and follow-up interviews served to clarify and expand upon initial discussions. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Constant comparisons and a narrative approach guided the analyses and a relational ethics conceptual lens was applied to the data to identify emergent issues.

Results: 12 HCPs (nurses, fellows, physician; 6 male, 6 female) participated. Years of practice varied from one to 29 (median = 13), and all worked in an urban or suburban setting. eHealth tools accessed most frequently were online educational resources for patients (used by all participants in some form), followed by online resources for HCPs like curated scientific summaries on diagnostic criteria, clinical therapies, and dosage calculators. HCPs generally did not see how social media could be useful to their practice. Analysis revealed 3 emergent themes: 1) HCPs shared some commonalities in how they conceptualized an “ideal” engaged patient as medically literate, bringing “useful” data to consultations, and whose evolution is largely a product of the rise of eHealth; 2) Fears of eHealth technology disrupting existing practice habits and uncertainty about liability and confidentiality issues were a barrier to the adoption of new technology; 3) Most HCPs saw eHealth tools as facilitating a shift towards a patient-provider relationship where shared decision-making is the new norm. Perceptions on the usefulness and impact of eHealth technologies varied from doubtful to enthusiastic. All declared a primary concern for best possible patient outcomes, and some saw eHealth as integral to reaching that goal.

Conclusion: HCPs see eHealth technologies broadly as agents of change, for better or for worse, however, the perceived direction of that change is neither clear nor uniform given the varied experiences of this group. The value of these technologies was largely assessed through a relational ethics perspective, as the patient-provider relationship and its outcomes remained the primary concern of all HCPs. 1Townsend A et al. JMIR Res Protoc 2013;2(2):e38


Disclosure: G. Macdonald, None; A. F. Townsend, None; L. Li, None; S. Kerr, None; P. Adam, None; M. McDonald, None; C. L. Backman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Macdonald G, Townsend AF, Li L, Kerr S, Adam P, McDonald M, Backman CL. How Ehealth Technologies Are Changing the Office Visit: Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals in Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-ehealth-technologies-are-changing-the-office-visit-perspectives-from-healthcare-professionals-in-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-ehealth-technologies-are-changing-the-office-visit-perspectives-from-healthcare-professionals-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology