ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1858

How Did a Mandatory Switch Policy Influence the Uptake of Adalimumab Biosimilar and Other TNF Inhibitors?

Nick Bansback1, Michael law1, Fiona Clemont2, Mina Tadrous3, Sandra Blitz1 and Mark Harrison1, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, Health Services Research

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1840–1861) Health Services Research Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In response to the low uptake of biosimilars, British Columbia (BC) in Canada became the first jurisdiction in North America to require patients with inflammatory arthritis to switch to a biosimilar in order to maintain coverage. While the impact of this policy on etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (INF) has been previously reported, this study considered the impact of the policy on adalimumab (ADA) when the biosimilar became available in 2021.

Methods: We used administrative data from British Columbia (Population Data BC) to derive a cohort of patients with inflammatory arthritis being prescribed TNF inhibitor therapy before the policies were introduced. Previously established case definitions including ICD codes were used to establish patients with different inflammatory diseases. The data included both public and private coverage since commercial insurers providing supplementary drug coverage also aligned their policies with the BC Provincial government. Exceptional coverage for reference products was permitted under both biosimilar switching policies if medically necessary. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the trend of uptake pre and post the policy period, and a quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis to consider the change in trends. We used interrupted time series analysis to estimate biosimilar uptake.

Results: The study identified 11,171 BC residents aged 18 years or older who were using a TNF inhibitor during the study period (01/2015-12/2021). The mean age of the cohort was 54 years and 59% were female. During the first switch policy that included mandatory switches for ETA and INF in 2019, biosimilar prescriptions increased from 7.9% to 35.0% of all TNF prescriptions. After the first switch period, there was a small but consistent decline in overall biosimilar use, with an increase in golimumab and certolizumab prescriptions. During the second switch policy in 2021 which focused on adalimumab, overall biosimilar prescriptions increased from 34% to 72% of all TNF inhibitor prescriptions. In December 2021, 96.4%, 93.0% and 92.0% of prescriptions for ADA, ETA and INF respectively were biosimilar products.

Conclusion: The study findings indicate that a mandatory switch policy for biosimilar adalimumab has been as successful as the policy for infliximab and etanercept achieving high biosimilar use in British Columbia. Prior to the policy, uptake was low indicating the need for such a policy to influence change. Further analysis will explore changes in other healthcare utilization and assess the long-term effects of these policies. These findings are particularly relevant to regions with concentrated insurance systems, as mandatory switching policies could yield greater cost savings.

Supporting image 1

Utilization of TNF inhibitors – originators and biosimilars – in patients with inflammatory disease over time


Disclosures: N. Bansback: None; M. law: None; F. Clemont: None; M. Tadrous: None; S. Blitz: None; M. Harrison: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bansback N, law M, Clemont F, Tadrous M, Blitz S, Harrison M. How Did a Mandatory Switch Policy Influence the Uptake of Adalimumab Biosimilar and Other TNF Inhibitors? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-did-a-mandatory-switch-policy-influence-the-uptake-of-adalimumab-biosimilar-and-other-tnf-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/how-did-a-mandatory-switch-policy-influence-the-uptake-of-adalimumab-biosimilar-and-other-tnf-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology