ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1912

High Dimensional Flowcytometric Profiling Distinguishes Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Michelle Mulder1, Juul van den Reek 2, Elke de Jong 2, Bram van Cranenbroek 2, Ruben Smeets 2, Irma Joosten 2, Xuehui He 3, Frank van den Hoogen 1, Hans Koenen 3 and Mark Wenink 1, 1Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Radboudumc, Njimegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: flow cytometry and pathogenesis, psoriasis, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M121: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical IV: Axial Spondyloarthritis Translational Research (1908–1913)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Psoriasis (Pso) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease. About 30% of Pso patients develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic inflammation of joints and entheses with an additional negative impact on quality of life. Early detection of PsA patients is important to ensure timely treatment and prevention of structural joint damage. Unfortunately, PsA is markedly under-diagnosed by dermatologists; an unmet need for biomarker-profiles to screen Pso patients at-risk is obvious. The aim of our study was to assess whether high dimensional flowcytometric profiling can distinguish Pso and PsA patients. 

Methods: A cross-sectional and case-control study recruited 25 Pso patients without arthritis and 33 patients with PsA, both not using biological therapy at baseline. Psoriasis was diagnosed by a dermatologist and all the included Pso patients had a Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) score of 2 or lower. All PsA patients were clinically diagnosed by a rheumatologist.

Peripheral blood samples were analyzed by high dimensional flowcytometry, consisting of five different and supplementary 10-color antibody panels, which enables the characterization of ~150 immune cell populations. Both semi-unsupervised and unsupervised computational flow cytometry analyses were performed. In case of semi-unsupervised analysis, the flow cytometry data was first manually analysed, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of PCA (HCPC). For unsupervised computational flow cytometry, flowsom and viSNE analysis packages of Cytobank were used.

Results: The PsA and Pso population were comparable with regard to gender. In line with expectations, the PsA patients were slightly older compared to the Pso patients (57±15.4 vs 44±14.6). There was a significant difference in the use of methotrexate between the PsA patients (51%) and Pso patients (12%). Semi-unsupervised analysis of high dimensional flow cytometry data of peripheral blood from Pso and PsA patients clearly revealed differential clustering of Pso-vs-PsA patients as indicated by principal component analysis (Fig 1). This distinction between Pso and PsA patients was independent of age, gender, PASI scores and methotrexate use. Also unsupervised clustering showed a clear distinction between both diseases. Similar, unsupervised computational analysis utilizing flowsom and viSNE showed marked differences in the immune cell subset profiles between Pso and PsA patients (Fig 2).

Conclusion: High dimensional flowcytometric evaluation with semi-unsupervised and unsupervised analysis, can differentiate Pso and PsA patiens. Following validation, the obtained immune profiles might be used to support the timely diagnosis of PsA in Pso patients, as well as target finding to prevent this disease-shift.

Figure 1: Semi-unsupervised clustering based on principal component analysis. Red dots represent PsA patients, blue dots represent Pso patients.

Figure 2: Density plots of different celsubsets in PsA and Pso based on viSNE analysis.


Disclosure: M. Mulder, None; J. van den Reek, None; E. de Jong, None; B. van Cranenbroek, None; R. Smeets, None; I. Joosten, None; X. He, None; F. van den Hoogen, AbbVie, 5, Actelion, 2, Amgen, 8, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion Healthcare, 5, 8, Corbus, 8, Eli Lily, 2, Janssen, 8, Mundipharma, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, Roche, 8, Sandoz, 8, Sanofi Genzyme, 5; H. Koenen, None; M. Wenink, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mulder M, van den Reek J, de Jong E, van Cranenbroek B, Smeets R, Joosten I, He X, van den Hoogen F, Koenen H, Wenink M. High Dimensional Flowcytometric Profiling Distinguishes Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-dimensional-flowcytometric-profiling-distinguishes-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-dimensional-flowcytometric-profiling-distinguishes-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology