ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 835

High Baseline Patient’s Compared with Evaluator’s Global Assessment Is Associated with Lower Retention and Remission Rates of First TNF Inhibitor in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients – Data from the EuroSpA Research Collaboration Network

Brigitte Michelsen1, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg 2, Herman Mann 3, Tore Kvien 4, Michael J. Nissen 5, Maria José Santos 6, Dan Nordström 7, Lennart Jacobsson 8, Ziga Rotar 9, Bjorn Gudbjornsson 10, Süleyman Serdar Koca 11, Catalin Codreanu 12, Manuel Pombo-Suarez 13, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma 14, Anne Gitte Loft 15, Karel Pavelka 3, Eirik Kristianslund 16, Burkhard Moeller 17, Elsa Vieira-Sousa 18, Anna Mari Hokkanen 19, Ulf Lindström 20, Matija Tomsic 21, Thorvardur J Love 22, Abdurrahman Tufan 23, Ruxandra IONESCU 24, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra 25, Marleen van de Sande 26, Gary Macfarlane 27, Florenzo Iannone 28, Lise Hyldstrup 2, Mikkel Østergaard 29 and Merete Lund Hetland 30, 1Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark/ Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway/ Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 2Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague 2, Czech Republic, 4Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Dept. of Rheumatology / University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway, 5University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 6Rheumatology department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 7Department of Medicine, ROB-FIN, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland., Helsinki, Finland, 8Dept of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,, Gothenburg, Sweden, 9UMC LJUBLJANA, DPT. OF RHEUMATOLOGY, LJUBLJANA, Slovenia, 10Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 11Fırat University School of Medicine Division of Rheumatology, Elazığ, Turkey, 12Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania., Bucharest, Romania, 13Unit Research, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 14Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 15Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Århus, Denmark, 16Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Oslo, Norway, 17University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 18Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE | Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular - Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal,, Lisbon, Portugal, 19Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 20University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 21Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 22Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 23Division of Rheumatology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 24SPITALUL CLINIC SFANTA MARIA, Bucharest, 25Research Unit, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 26Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 27University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 28Department of Emergency and Transplantation , Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Bari, Bari, Italy., Bari, Italy, 29Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 30DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, patient-reported outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis, remission and registries

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S076: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes I: Patient Reported Outcomes (833–838)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Discordance between baseline patient’s and evaluator’s global assessment of disease activity is common1 and may reduce the likelihood of remission following tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).2 However, the impact of such discordance on retention rates of TNFi in PsA patients remains unexplored. Hence, the aim of this study was to explore the impact of discordance, defined as patient’s minus evaluator’s global assessment (ΔPEG), on retention rates and remission rates (DAS28(3)CRP (without patient’s global) and DAS28(4)CRP (including patient’s global)) in PsA patients initiating their first TNFi treatment. We used pooled data from the European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration Network (EuroSpA).

Methods: TNFi naïve PsA patients from 11 European registries in EuroSpA were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate TNFi retention rates after 6/12/24 months, with comparison between baseline ΔPEG quartiles using the log rank test, stratified by gender. Remission rates were compared between different ΔPEG quartiles with Chi-square test, stratified by gender.

Results: A total of 5855 PsA patients were included. Mean (SD) age for women (n=2988) / men (n=2867) were 49.3 (12.5) / 47.4 (11.7) years, disease duration 6.6 (7.3) / 6.7 (7.2) years, median (25-75 percentiles) baseline ΔPEG 17 (0-38) / 10 (0-30) mm. Retention rates and DAS28(4)CRP but not DAS28(3)CRP remission rates were lower for higher quartiles of baseline ΔPEG (table, figure).

Conclusion: High baseline discordance (ΔPEG) was associated with lower TNFi retention rates and with lower DAS28(4)CRP remission rates, but not DAS28(3)CRP remission rates, after 6, 12 and 24 months’ follow-up in both male and female PsA patients. The choice of remission criteria in the follow-up of PsA patients may affect important treatment decisions, and may be of particular impact in patients with high baseline ΔPEG. 

Table. Retention and remission rates of first TNFi in PsA patients.

Figure. Retention rates of first TNFi across ΔPEG quartiles, censored by 104 weeks.


Disclosure: B. Michelsen, Novartis, 2, 5; L. Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Novartis, 2; H. Mann, None; T. Kvien, AbbVie, 2, 8, Biogen, 5, 8, Biogen, Egis, Eli Lilly, Hikma, Mylan, Novartis/Sandoz, Oktal, Hospira/Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, 5, BMS, 8, Celltrion, 8, Egis, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Hikma, 5, 8, Hospira/Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 8, Mylan, 5, 8, Novartis, 8, Novartis/Sandoz, 5, 8, Oktal, 5, 8, Orion Pharma, 8, Roche, 2, 8, Sandoz, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; M. Nissen, Abbvie, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, 5, 8; M. Santos, AbbVie, 8, Biogen, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, Roche, 8; D. Nordström, AbbVie, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 4, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; L. Jacobsson, None; Z. Rotar, AbbVie, 9, Amgen, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 9, MSD, 5, Novartis, 9, Pfizer, 9, Sanofi, 5; B. Gudbjornsson, Actavis, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8; S. Koca, None; C. Codreanu, AbbVie, 5, 8, Egis, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 5, 8, Ewopharma, 5, 8, Mylan, 5, 8, Novartis/Sandoz, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; M. Pombo-Suarez, None; I. van der Horst-Bruinsma, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers-Squibb, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8; A. Loft, None; K. Pavelka, AbbVie, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, BMS, 8, Egis, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 8; E. Kristianslund, None; B. Moeller, AbbVie, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, 8, Merck, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, 8, Pfizer, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 9; E. Vieira-Sousa, None; A. Hokkanen, None; U. Lindström, None; M. Tomsic, None; T. Love, None; A. Tufan, None; R. IONESCU, Abbvie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Alpha Sigma, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Ewopharma, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Mylan, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8; C. Sánchez-Piedra, None; M. van de Sande, None; G. Macfarlane, Celgene, 2; F. Iannone, AbbVie, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, lilly, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; L. Hyldstrup, Novartis, 2; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 8, 9, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, and Novartis, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 8, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 2, 8, Hospira, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, 8, Orion, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, roche, 9, Sandoz, 2, 8, Sanofi, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; M. Lund Hetland, Abbvie, 2, AbbVie, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, CellTrion, 2, 9, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Orion, 2, Pfizer, 2, Samsung, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Michelsen B, Midtbøll Ørnbjerg L, Mann H, Kvien T, Nissen M, Santos M, Nordström D, Jacobsson L, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Koca S, Codreanu C, Pombo-Suarez M, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Loft A, Pavelka K, Kristianslund E, Moeller B, Vieira-Sousa E, Hokkanen A, Lindström U, Tomsic M, Love T, Tufan A, IONESCU R, Sánchez-Piedra C, van de Sande M, Macfarlane G, Iannone F, Hyldstrup L, Østergaard M, Lund Hetland M. High Baseline Patient’s Compared with Evaluator’s Global Assessment Is Associated with Lower Retention and Remission Rates of First TNF Inhibitor in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients – Data from the EuroSpA Research Collaboration Network [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-baseline-patients-compared-with-evaluators-global-assessment-is-associated-with-lower-retention-and-remission-rates-of-first-tnf-inhibitor-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-baseline-patients-compared-with-evaluators-global-assessment-is-associated-with-lower-retention-and-remission-rates-of-first-tnf-inhibitor-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology