ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1099

Hepatitis B Reactivation in Rheumatologic Patients

Yassir Daghistani1, Fergus To2, Patrick Doyle3,4, Hin Hin Ko5, Mel Krajden3,4, Jason Kur2, Alnoor Ramji6, Kam Shojania2, Edward Tam5, John Wade2, Eric Yoshida5, Graham Reid2, Siegfried Erb5 and Mollie Carruthers2, 1Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Gatroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Hepatitis, immunosuppressants, liver disease, medication and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The widespread usage of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatology has increased the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) re-activation. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection was estimated at 3.0% and 3.5%, respectively in two large, cross-sectional studies in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies internationally. HBV reactivation (HBVr) after using immunosuppressive medicines has been observed in 6.8% of fulminant hepatitis cases in Japan. We aimed to quantify the knowledge gap in the practice of rheumatologists with regards to management of HBVr in rheumatologic patients using a Canada-wide survey.

Methods: In order to assess the discrepancy in practice with regards to dealing with HBV infection in patients started on biologic and non-biologic DMARDs, we conducted a short pilot survey of 15 rheumatologists and 2 rheumatology fellows at an inter-city rheumatology rounds aimed at assessing any knowledge gap. Subsequently, an expert panel of five hepatologists, two infectious disease specialists and four rheumatologists helped generate a final questionnaire. The final survey included questions regarding chronic hepatitis B monitoring and anti-viral prophylaxis with either biologic or non-biologic DMARDs or corticosteroids. A Canada-wide survey was sent to the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) members. The results were compared to the American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) guidelines.

Results: There were 17 respondents to the pilot survey. Of 7 questions in the pilot survey, there were 47% of questions that were either answered incorrectly or marked “I don’t know”. The final survey was sent to 521 members of CRA. The response rate was 27.25% for a total of 142 responses. Interestingly, 8.8% of the responders thought not to send their HBsAg positive patients to a gastroenterologist, although anti-viral prophylaxis would be indicated and hepatology monitoring. There were 58% of the respondents who would order unnecessary test like anti-HBs for monitoring a patient who is HBsAg positive and is on immunosuppressive medication. Another 43% answered incorrectly to start anti-viral prophylaxis for patients who are HBsAg positive and are on DMARDs.

Conclusion: The results of our survey highlight the knowledge gap in monitoring and treating chronic hepatitis B in rheumatology patients. All patients with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity on immunosuppression including prednisone should be referred to gastroenterology. Similarly, patients on high risk medicines with hepatitis B core antibody positivity despite hepatitis surface antibody status should be monitored and started early on anti-viral prophylaxis.


Disclosure: Y. Daghistani, None; F. To, None; P. Doyle, None; H. H. Ko, None; M. Krajden, None; J. Kur, None; A. Ramji, None; K. Shojania, None; E. Tam, None; J. Wade, None; E. Yoshida, None; G. Reid, None; S. Erb, None; M. Carruthers, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Daghistani Y, To F, Doyle P, Ko HH, Krajden M, Kur J, Ramji A, Shojania K, Tam E, Wade J, Yoshida E, Reid G, Erb S, Carruthers M. Hepatitis B Reactivation in Rheumatologic Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hepatitis-b-reactivation-in-rheumatologic-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hepatitis-b-reactivation-in-rheumatologic-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology