ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1335

Guselkumab Provides Sustained Domain-Specific and Comprehensive Efficacy as Assessed Using Composite Endpoints in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Laura Coates1, Christopher Ritchlin2, Laure Gossec3, Philip S Helliwell4, Proton Rahman5, Elizabeth Hsia6, Alexa Kollmeier7, Xie Xu6, Chetan Karyekar8, May Shawi9, Wim Noel10, Yusang Jiang6, Shihong Sheng6, Yanli Wang6 and Philip Mease11, 1Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 3Sorbonne Université and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Department of Medicine, Eastern Health and Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 8Janssen R&D, Spring House, PA, 9Janssen Immunology Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Toronto, ON, Canada, 10Janssen Pharmaceutica, Vilvoorde, Belgium, 11Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis I (1329–1363)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS) is a human monoclonal antibody specific to the p19-subunit of interleukin-23. GUS significantly improved signs and symptoms of PsA through Week 24, and improvements were maintained through Week 52 in the phase 3 DISCOVER-11 and DISCOVER-22 studies. This study assessed GUS efficacy through Week 52 in DISCOVER-1&-2 using composite indices.

Methods: Adult patients enrolled had active PsA despite standard therapies. Patients in DISCOVER-1 had ≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥0.3 mg/dL; in DISCOVER-2, patients had ≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL. 31% of DISCOVER-1 patients received 1-2 prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; DISCOVER-2 patients were biologic-naïve. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo (PBO); PBO patients crossed over to GUS 100 mg Q4W at Week 24. Composite endpoints pooled across the two studies were: Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), and Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA). GUS versus PBO comparisons through Week 24 employed a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with baseline stratification factors or Fisher’s exact test; no treatment group comparisons were performed beyond Week 24. P-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. From Week 24 -Week 52, patients with missing data were considered nonresponders ( >90% of patients completed study treatment through Week 52).

Results: In randomized and treated patients from DISCOVER-1 (N=381) and DISCOVER-2 (N=739), pooled baseline characteristics were generally well-balanced across treatment groups and reflected active disease. Differences in response rates between GUS Q4W or Q8W and PBO were seen as early as Week 8 and increased over time through Week 24. In patients continuing GUS Q4W or Q8W, respectively, post-Week 24 response rates associated with these composite indices continued to increase through Week 52, at which time they were 54.2% and 52.5% for DAPSA LDA, 45.3% and 41.9% for PASDAS LDA, 35.9% and 30.7% for MDA, 18.2% and 17.6% for DAPSA remission, and 13.1% and 14.4% for VLDA, with no discernable difference between the GUS Q4W and Q8W dosing regimens (Table and Fig). After PBO patients crossed over to GUS Q4W at Week 24, response rates increased through Week 52.

Conclusion: GUS 100 mg Q4W and Q8W provided robust and sustained benefits to patients with active PsA across multiple domains, indicating that GUS may provide an alternative treatment option for the diverse manifestations of PsA.

References:

1Ritchlin CT, et al. RMD Open. 2021;7(1):e001457
2McInnes IB, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(4):604-616


Disclosures: L. Coates, Abbvie, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, Celgene, 5, 6, Gilead, 6, Janssen, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Medac, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 6, Galapagos, 6, GSK, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 6, Domain, 2; C. Ritchlin, UCB, 2, 5, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Novartis, 2, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2; L. Gossec, Galapagos, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Biogen, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 2, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, UCB, 2; P. Helliwell, Pfizer Inc, 1, Novartis, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, AbbVie, 6, Galapagos, 1, Eli Lilly, 1; P. Rahman, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Merck, 2, 6; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; C. Karyekar, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, 11; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; W. Noel, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, 12, Owns stock in Johnson & Johnson; Y. Jiang, Cytel, Inc., providing statistical support (funded by Janssen), 3; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; Y. Wang, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates L, Ritchlin C, Gossec L, Helliwell P, Rahman P, Hsia E, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Karyekar C, Shawi M, Noel W, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Wang Y, Mease P. Guselkumab Provides Sustained Domain-Specific and Comprehensive Efficacy as Assessed Using Composite Endpoints in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-sustained-domain-specific-and-comprehensive-efficacy-as-assessed-using-composite-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-sustained-domain-specific-and-comprehensive-efficacy-as-assessed-using-composite-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology