ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0908

Guselkumab Efficacy in Adult Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis by Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics: Pooled Results of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies

Atul Deodhar1, Philip Mease2, Wolf-Henning Boehncke3, John Tesser4, Elena Schiopu5, Soumya Chakravarty6, Alexa Kollmeier7, Elizabeth Hsia8, Xie Xu9, May Shawi10, Yusang Jiang11, Shihong Sheng11, Prasheen Agarwal11, Joseph Merola12, Iain McInnes13 and Christopher Ritchlin14, 1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 2Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, 3Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, 4Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, Phoenix, AZ, 5Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA and Drexel University College of Medicine, Horsham, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 9Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 10Janssen Global Services, LLC, Toronto, ON, Canada, 11Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 12Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Newton, MA, 13Institute of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 14Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-23p19-subunit, has shown consistent efficacy in psoriasis pts regardless of body weight/body mass index (BMI).1 GUS has also shown efficacy across joint and skin endpoints at Week 24 (W24) of the Phase 3 DISCOVER-12 and DISCOVER-2 PsA3 trials. We assessed GUS efficacy at W24 across baseline demographic and disease characteristics subgroups by pooling data across the 2 trials.

Methods: Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies were enrolled in DISCOVER-1 (≥3 swollen & ≥3 tender joints; CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL) and DISCOVER-2 (≥5 swollen & ≥5 tender joints; CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL). 31% of DISCOVER-1 pts had received 1-2 prior TNF inhibitors; DISCOVER-2 pts were biologic-naïve. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo (PBO). GUS effects on joint (ACR50) and skin (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA=0/1 + ≥2-grade reduction from W0] in pts with ≥3% body surface area [BSA] psoriasis and IGA ≥2 at W0) responses were evaluated by pt sex, age, body weight, BMI, PsA duration, tender/swollen joint counts (ACR50 only), % BSA (IGA 0/1 only), CRP, and non-biologic (nb) DMARD/methotrexate (MTX) use at W0. Missing data were imputed as nonresponse. Logistic regression compared GUS vs PBO; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown on a logarithmic scale.

Results: Baseline characteristics of randomized and treated pts in DISCOVER-1 (N=381) and DISCOVER-2 (N=739) were generally well-balanced across groups.1,2 On average, the 1120 pooled pts were 47 yrs and 85 kg at W0; 52% were male; 96% were white. At W24, 34% (127/373) and 31% (116/375), respectively, of pooled GUS Q4W- and Q8W-treated pts achieved ACR50 vs 12% (46/372) for PBO; respective ORs (95% CIs) were 3.7 (2, 5) and 3.2 (2, 5). In subgroups with sufficient sample size, the benefit of GUS Q4W and Q8W over PBO in substantially improving joint signs and symptoms was seen regardless of sex (ORs 3–4), age (2–4), body weight/BMI (3–6), PsA duration (2–7), swollen/tender joint count (2–10), CRP (2–6), or nbDMARD/MTX use (2–5) at baseline. In pooled pts with ≥3% BSA psoriasis and IGA ≥2 at W0, 71% (193/273) and 66% (171/258), respectively, of GUS Q4W- and Q8W-treated pts, vs 18% (47/261) for PBO, had an IGA 0/1 response at W24; respective ORs (95% CIs) were 11 (7, 16) and 9 (6, 14). The benefit of GUS in achieving clear or almost clear skin was seen regardless of sex (ORs 7-15), age (8-15), body weight/BMI (9-12), PsA duration (8-12), % BSA (7-25), CRP (8-13), or nbDMARD/MTX use (8–21) at baseline. Note that small sample sizes in several pt subgroups (eg, pts >65 years, swollen joint count >15) limit their data interpretation. Consistent results were seen for other joint (ACR20/70), skin (PASI90/100), and soft tissue (enthesitis) outcomes.

Conclusion: Conclusions: The benefits of guselkumab 100 mg Q4W and Q8W in substantially improving signs and symptoms of active PsA appeared to be consistent irrespective of the baseline characteristics assessed.

References: 1Armstrong A, et al. World Congress of Dermatology 2019; Poster P524; 2Deodhar A, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1115-25; 3Mease P, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1126-36.


Disclosure: A. Deodhar, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Celgene, 5, Galapagos, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5; W. Boehncke, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, 5; J. Tesser, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, Abbvie, 1, 2, 3, Sun Pharma, 1, 2, 3, Novartis, 1, 2, Lilly, 1, 2, 3, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Amgen, 1; E. Schiopu, Octapharma, 2; S. Chakravarty, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; Y. Jiang, None; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; J. Merola, AbbVie, 9, Merck, 9, Dermavant, 9, Eli Lilly, 9, Novartis, 9, Janssen, 9, UCB, 9, Samumed, 9, Celgene, 9, Sanofi, 9, Regeneron, 9, GlaxoSmithKline, 9, Sun Pharmaceutical, 9, Almirall, 9, Biogen, 9, Pfizer, 9, Incyte, 9, Aclaris, 9, LEO Pharma, 9; I. McInnes, Novartis, 9, AbbVie, 9, Celgene, 9, Janssen, 2, 9, UCB, 2, 9, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 9, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Lilly, 9, LEO, 9; C. Ritchlin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Deodhar A, Mease P, Boehncke W, Tesser J, Schiopu E, Chakravarty S, Kollmeier A, Hsia E, Xu X, Shawi M, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Merola J, McInnes I, Ritchlin C. Guselkumab Efficacy in Adult Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis by Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics: Pooled Results of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-efficacy-in-adult-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-by-baseline-demographic-and-disease-characteristics-pooled-results-of-two-phase-3-randomized-placebo-controlled-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-efficacy-in-adult-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-by-baseline-demographic-and-disease-characteristics-pooled-results-of-two-phase-3-randomized-placebo-controlled-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology