ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2585

Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors Improve Patient-perceived Impact of Psoriatic Arthritis Similarly: 6-month Interim Results of the PsABIOnd Observational Cohort Study

Stefan Siebert1, Mohamed Sharaf2, Carlo Selmi3, Proton Rahman4, Mitsumasa Kishimoto5, Enrique R. Soriano6, Emmanouil Rampakakis7, László Köleséri8, Minni Koivunen9, Frederic Lavie10, Ruben Queiro Silva11, Frank Behrens12, Ennio Lubrano13 and Laure Gossec14, 1School of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2Johnson & Johnson, Middle East FZ LLC, Dubai, UAE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy, 4Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. John's, Canada, 5Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 6Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 7McGill University, Department of Pediatrics / Scientific Affairs, JSS Medical Research Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 8Data Sciences Staffing Solutions, IQVIA, Inc, Budapest, Hungary, 9Janssen Cilag Oy, Espoo, Finland, Espoo, Finland, 10Janssen Cilag Global Medical Affairs, Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Issy les Moulineaux, France, 11Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo University School of Medicine, Oviedo, Spain, 12University Hospital Goethe University Frankfurt and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt, Germany, 13Vincenzo Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy, 14Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Abstracts: SpA Including PsA – Treatment II

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: PsA leads to significant patient-perceived burden of disease. Targeted drugs have demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials including in aspects of patient-reported impact. However, comparison data from observational studies are scarce, particularly for IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors (i). As part of the 6 month (M) interim analysis of the first ≥600 participants (pts) enrolled in the PsABIOnd observational study of PsA, we assessed changes from baseline (BL) in PsA Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID‑12) following biologic treatment initiation.

Methods: PsABIOnd (NCT05049798) is an ongoing international, prospective, observational cohort study in 1300 planned PsA pts starting guselkumab (GUS) or IL-17i as first- to fourth-line of biologic therapy (monotherapy or in combination with other agents) per standard clinical practice [1]. All enrolled pts with available PsAID-12 data at BL and the 6M visit (+/-3M) were analysed according to their treatment group (regardless of later switches). Impact of PsA was assessed with PsAID-12 comprising 12 items (pain, fatigue, skin problems, work/leisure participation, function, discomfort, sleep, coping, fear, embarrassment, social participation and depression) scored 0‑10, with higher values indicating a worse state. Mean change from BL in PsAID-12 subdomain and total scores, and proportions of pts achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII, ≥1.4) at the 6M visit in both cohorts were determined. Propensity score (PS) analysis evaluated treatment effect for the change in PsAID-12 total score and MCII (using nonresponder imputation), adjusting for BL variable imbalances across cohorts. Subdomain analyses were descriptive.

Results: At the Jan 2024 cutoff date, 323 and 296 pts receiving GUS or IL-17i, respectively, with PsAID-12 data available at BL and the 6M visit were analysed. In both cohorts, PsAID-12 subdomains with highest impact at BL were pain, fatigue, and discomfort. At the 6M visit, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) changes from BL in PsAID-12 total score were similar in the GUS (-1.5 [-1.7; -1.3]) and IL-17i (-1.6 [‑1.8; ‑1.3]) cohorts (Fig 1A). PS-adjusted treatment effect (regression coefficient [95% CI]) for GUS vs IL‑17i in change from BL in PsAID-12 total score was not significant (0.2 [-0.3; 0.6]). Proportions of pts achieving MCII in PsAID-12 total score at the 6M visit were 53% and 48% in the GUS and IL-17i cohorts, respectively (Fig 1B), with a non-significant PS-adjusted treatment effect (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.8;  1.8]). At the 6M visit, mean changes from BL in subdomain scores were similar across cohorts, ranging from ‑0.8 (-1.1; -0.5) for depression to -2.3 (-2.7; -2.0) for skin problems in the GUS cohort, and ‑0.8 (-1.1; -0.5) for depression to ‑1.9 (-2.2; -1.5) for discomfort in the IL-17i cohort (Fig 2).

Conclusion: By 6M of treatment, clinically meaningful improvements in PsAID-12 total score were seen in around half of pts treated with GUS or IL-17i, with similar magnitudes of effect across subdomains in both cohorts. These results may be useful in shared treatment decision-making.

References
1. Siebert. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:489

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: S. Siebert: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 5, 6, Teijin Pharma, 6, UCB, 5; M. Sharaf: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; C. Selmi: AbbVie, 2, 5, Alfa-Wasserman, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, EUSA, 2, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 5, SOBI, 2; P. Rahman: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 12, Meeting attendance/travel support, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; M. Kishimoto: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, 2, 6, Astellas, 2, 6, Ayumi Pharma, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 6, Eisai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; E. Soriano: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, 3; L. Köleséri: IQVIA, 3, Janssen, 2; M. Koivunen: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; F. Lavie: Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; R. Queiro Silva: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6; F. Behrens: AbbVie, 2, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Chugai, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Genzyme, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; E. Lubrano: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, GlaxoSmithKline, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, UCB, 6; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sandoz, 2, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Siebert S, Sharaf M, Selmi C, Rahman P, Kishimoto M, Soriano E, Rampakakis E, Köleséri L, Koivunen M, Lavie F, Queiro Silva R, Behrens F, Lubrano E, Gossec L. Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors Improve Patient-perceived Impact of Psoriatic Arthritis Similarly: 6-month Interim Results of the PsABIOnd Observational Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-and-il-17-inhibitors-improve-patient-perceived-impact-of-psoriatic-arthritis-similarly-6-month-interim-results-of-the-psabiond-observational-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-and-il-17-inhibitors-improve-patient-perceived-impact-of-psoriatic-arthritis-similarly-6-month-interim-results-of-the-psabiond-observational-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology