ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1344

Guselkumab, an IL-23 Inhibitor That Specifically Binds to the IL23p19-Subunit, for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: One Year Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Patients Who Were Biologic-Naïve or TNFα Inhibitor-Experienced

Christopher Ritchlin1, Philip Helliwell2, Wolf-Henning Boehncke3, Elizabeth Hsia4, Alexa Kollmeier5, Ramanand Subramanian6, Xie Xu7, Shihong Sheng6, Yusang Jiang6, Bei Zhou6 and Atul Deodhar8, 1Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, 4Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 8Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23, is approved to treat psoriasis (PsO). At Week 24 of the Phase 3, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial in patients (pts) with active PsA who were biologic-naïve or prior TNFα inhibitor (TNFi)-treated (DISCOVER-1), GUS 100 mg, given every 4/8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W), demonstrated efficacy for joint and skin symptoms, physical function, and quality of life vs PBO. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with GUS safety in PsO. This study assessed GUS efficacy and safety in pts with PsA through 1 year.

Methods: Adults with active PsA (≥3 swollen + ≥3 tender joints; CRP≥0.3 mg/dL) despite standard therapies were eligible. Approximately 30% of pts could have previously received ≤2 TNFi. Pts were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by Week 0 DMARD (Y/N) and prior TNFi use (Y/N), to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at Weeks 0 and 4, and Q8W; or PBO. At Week 24, PBO pts crossed over to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO X Q4W). Week 48 marked the last dose of study agent. ACR response rates at Week 52, based on non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data and as observed in pts still on study agent at Week 24, are shown. Observed data for additional endpoints are shown. AEs were reported through Week 60.

Results: 362/381 (95%) randomized pts continued study agent at Week 24 (125 Q4W, 123 Q8W, 114 PBO X Q4W), 347/381 (91%) pts completed treatment, and 343/381 (90%) completed the study. NRI ACR20 response rates were maintained at Week 52 (Q4W: 73%, Q8W: 60%; Fig. 1A). Similar response patterns were seen for the more stringent ACR50/70 criteria (Fig. 1C, E). Observed ACR responses, overall (Fig. 1B, D, F) and in pts with (Fig. 2A, C, E) and without (Fig. 2B, D, F) prior TNFi use, were also maintained at Week 52. Improvements in other clinical outcomes were also maintained at Week 52, and responses for pts crossing over from PBO X Q4W at Week 24 were generally consistent with other GUS-treated pts by Week 52 (Table 1). Through Week 24, 4 (2%) GUS- and 5 (4%) PBO-treated pts had serious AEs; no GUS-treated and 2 (2%) PBO-treated pts had a serious infection. Through Week 60, serious AEs and serious infections occurred in 4% and 1%, respectively, of all 369 GUS-treated pts. No GUS-treated pt died or had IBD, opportunistic infections or active tuberculosis, or anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reactions.

Conclusion: GUS Q4W and Q8W maintained improvements in joint symptoms through 1 year in pts with active PsA who were biologic-naïve or previously TNFi-treated. In pts continuing in the study, improvements in skin symptoms, dactylitis, enthesitis, physical function, and quality of life were also maintained through 1 year. GUS 100 mg Q4W and Q8W were safe and well-tolerated through study completion and consistent with GUS safety in PsO.1

Reference: 1. TREMFYA® (guselkumab) Prescribing Information. Janssen Biotech, Inc. 2017. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761061s000lbl.pdf

GUS, guselkumab; NRI, non-responder imputation; PBO, placebo; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.


Disclosure: C. Ritchlin, None; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, Pfizer Inc, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 2, UCB, 8; W. Boehncke, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, 5; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; R. Subramanian, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., 3; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; Y. Jiang, None; B. Zhou, Janssen Reserach & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; A. Deodhar, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Celgene, 5, Galapagos, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ritchlin C, Helliwell P, Boehncke W, Hsia E, Kollmeier A, Subramanian R, Xu X, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Zhou B, Deodhar A. Guselkumab, an IL-23 Inhibitor That Specifically Binds to the IL23p19-Subunit, for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: One Year Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Patients Who Were Biologic-Naïve or TNFα Inhibitor-Experienced [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-an-il-23-inhibitor-that-specifically-binds-to-the-il23p19-subunit-for-active-psoriatic-arthritis-one-year-results-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-of-pati/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-an-il-23-inhibitor-that-specifically-binds-to-the-il23p19-subunit-for-active-psoriatic-arthritis-one-year-results-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-of-pati/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology