ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 519

Greater Fatigue at Baseline and Female Gender Predict Worse Disability in Early RA Despite Treatment to Target: A Comparison of Two Observational Cohort Studies from the United Kingdom

Sarah Twigg1, Elizabeth M.A. Hensor2, Jane E. Freeston1, Ai Lyn Tan1, Alan Tennant3, Paul Emery4, Ann Morgan5 and YEAR consortium, IACON consortium , 1NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Swiss Paraplegic Research,, Nottwil, Switzerland, 4NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Disability and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster I: Clinical Characteristics/Presentation/Prognosis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although disability is part of the ‘core set’ of outcomes for RA research recommended by OMERACT (1), current therapeutic strategies focus on inflammation. The treat to target approach instigated in 2010 (2) saw a step-change in RA management, with frequent clinical review to achieve remission or low disease activity. The aim of this study was to compare disease activity (DAS28) and disability (measured by HAQ) in 2 early RA cohorts, both before and after the implementation of treat to target approaches.

Methods: Cases with recent onset RA recruited to Yorkshire Early Arthritis Register (YEAR) between 2002 and 2009 were treated with a ‘step-up’ approach, using synthetic DMARDs. Of 725 cases included, 585 met 1987 ACR RA classification criteria and a further 115 met 2010 criteria. A second cohort, IACON (INflammatory Arthritis CONtinuum), recruited patients with early inflammatory arthritis between 2010 and 2014, treated according to ‘treat to target’ principles including biologic therapies. Data from 384 patients meeting 2010 ACR/EULAR classification were applied to the present study. Latent growth curve models of change in DAS28 and HAQ were compared between YEAR and IACON. Latent class growth analysis identified latent trajectories of change in HAQ-DI and logistic regression tested baseline predictors of HAQ trajectory, including age, gender, BMI, smoking status, CCP (RF considered separately) and fatigue. Presence of one or more common comorbidities was considered for the IACON group.

Results: Mean baseline DAS28 and HAQ were lower in IACON than YEAR (DAS28 4.01 vs. 4.70 and HAQ 1.13 vs. 1.27 in IACON and YEAR, respectively). A greater proportion of overall fall in DAS28 was achieved after 6 months in IACON (84%) than YEAR (68%). There were three latent trajectories of change in HAQ in YEAR and two in IACON (Figure 1). The ‘high stable’ group was not seen in IACON, possibly reflecting the more favourable change in DAS28 observed in this group. However, 66% of IACON cases followed a ‘moderate reducing’ HAQ trajectory, similar to the corresponding trajectory in YEAR. In both cohorts, female gender and higher baseline fatigue visual analogue score (VAS) predicted adverse HAQ trajectory. Odds ratios (OR) for moderate reducing compared to low reducing groups for females were 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.69, 4.49) in YEAR and 5.81 (2.44, 14.29) in IACON. Corresponding OR per cm fatigue were 1.13 (1.07, 1.20) in YEAR and 1.16 (1.12-1.20) in IACON.

Conclusion: More favourable trajectories of change in DAS28 and HAQ were seen in the Treat to Target group, but females and those with greater fatigue were more likely to fit into an adverse HAQ trajectory, suggesting that such patients may benefit from interventions to improve function as well as reduce inflammation. References

  1. Boers, M., et al. 1994. J Rheumatol Suppl, 41, 86.
  2. Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69(4):631.


Disclosure: S. Twigg, None; E. M. A. Hensor, None; J. E. Freeston, None; A. L. Tan, None; A. Tennant, None; P. Emery, None; A. Morgan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Twigg S, Hensor EMA, Freeston JE, Tan AL, Tennant A, Emery P, Morgan A. Greater Fatigue at Baseline and Female Gender Predict Worse Disability in Early RA Despite Treatment to Target: A Comparison of Two Observational Cohort Studies from the United Kingdom [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/greater-fatigue-at-baseline-and-female-gender-predict-worse-disability-in-early-ra-despite-treatment-to-target-a-comparison-of-two-observational-cohort-studies-from-the-united-kingdom/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/greater-fatigue-at-baseline-and-female-gender-predict-worse-disability-in-early-ra-despite-treatment-to-target-a-comparison-of-two-observational-cohort-studies-from-the-united-kingdom/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology