ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1477

Golimumab Improves Direct Costs of Healthcare Utilization and Indirect Costs Within Patients with RA, PsA, and as – Analysis of a Non-Interventional Study in Germany

Klaus Krüger 1, Gerd Burmester 2, Siegfried Wassenberg 3, Astrid Thiele 4 and Matthias Thomas5, 1Medical Centre of Rheumatology, Munich, Germany, 2Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Centre of Rheumatology, Ratingen, Germany, 4Krankenhaus St. Josef Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany, 5MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Haar, Germany

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: absenteeism, anti-TNF therapy and Golimumab, Costs of Healthcare utilization, socioeconomic analysis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatic diseases are associated with pain, loss of functionality, fatigue, hospitalization, sick leave, and work disability. This results in high economic burden for patients and society.Golimumab (GLM) is an effective but costly treatment option for patients with moderate to severe, active rheumatic diseases.
The aim of this analysis of the GO-NICE study was to investigate the direct and indirect costs of healthcare utilization and sick leave after starting a treatment with GLM.

Methods: Data from outpatients collected in the non-observational study GO-NICE in 1,483 patients with RA (n = 474), PsA (n=501), and AS (n=483) in 158 sites (2010-2015) in Germany were analysed. Details on the study design, patient characteristics, clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and safety data have been reported earlier [1,2].
Direct medical and indirect costs per patient and year were calculated for consultations, physiotherapy, massages, hospitalisations and inpatient rehabilitation, medication (DMARDs, Glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and biologics) as well as sick leave days. Findings were shown for RA-, PsA- and AS-patients and categorised by biologic-naïve patients and patients previously treated with a biologic argent. The 6-month periods prior baseline (BL) / start of a GLM therapy vs. month 24 (M24) were compared.
For this calculation standardized evaluation rates were used (Bock et al. (2015), AG MEG of the DGSMP (2005). Costs for prescribed and documented medication were calculated by the mean cost per defined daily dose (based 2010-2015). Indirect costs were estimated through the human capital approach (HCA).

Results: Data from 758 biologic-naïve patients (n = 265 RA, 247 PsA and 246 AS) and 694 patients with biologics as pre-therapy (n = 208 RA, 252 PsA and 234 AS) were included in the analysis.
Direct medical costs (excluding medication) decreased in all 6 groups, min. 765€ (PsA pre-treatment group) and max. 2,426€ (AS pre-treatment) as well as the costs due to work disability / absenteeism, min. 855€ (PsA pre-treatment) and max. 2.564€ (RA pre-treatment, table).
Total costs in biological-naïve patients increased due to the additional expense of the biologic agent.
Absolute changes in costs totalled 15,665€ (RA-, table), 15,799€ (PsA-) and 14,764€ (AS-patients) per patient and year when comparing the BL vs. M24 periods.
Total savings of 6,289€ (RA-, table), 2,617€ (PsA-), and 5,555€ (AS-patients) per patient and year were observed in the group of biologic-pre-treated patients.

Conclusion: Costs of healthcare utilization, as well as work disability, decreased after starting GLM within an observation period of 24 months, for patients with RA, PsA, and AS.
Due to the high costs of TNFi therapy, drug costs in the group of biologic-naive patients rose markedly. Savings were observed in the group of patients previously treated with a biologic argent.


ACR Abstract Costs_Table

Table: Costs per patient and year -Subgroup patients with RA-


Disclosure: K. Krüger, AbbVie, 5, 8, Biogen, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgen, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Hexal, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, UCB, 5, 8; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma., 5, 8, AbbVie Inc., 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Gilead, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Shar & Dohme, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Union Chimique Belge, 2, 5, 8; S. Wassenberg, AbbVie, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; A. Thiele, Biogen, 8, Celgen, 8, Chugai, 8, Hexal, 8, Janssen, 8, Lilly, 8, MSD, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, UCB, 8; M. Thomas, MSD Shap & Dohme GmbH Germany, 3, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Germany, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Krüger K, Burmester G, Wassenberg S, Thiele A, Thomas M. Golimumab Improves Direct Costs of Healthcare Utilization and Indirect Costs Within Patients with RA, PsA, and as – Analysis of a Non-Interventional Study in Germany [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/golimumab-improves-direct-costs-of-healthcare-utilization-and-indirect-costs-within-patients-with-ra-psa-and-as-analysis-of-a-non-interventional-study-in-germany/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/golimumab-improves-direct-costs-of-healthcare-utilization-and-indirect-costs-within-patients-with-ra-psa-and-as-analysis-of-a-non-interventional-study-in-germany/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology