ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 497

Golimumab Drug Utilization Patterns in Canada – Higher Retention Rate in Golimumab Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared to Etanercept and Adalimumab

Hayssam Khalil1 and Amir Tahami2, 1Medical Affairs, Janssen Canada Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Janssen Canada Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug therapy, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Golimumab is a monthly self-injected anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). It was approved by Health Canada in April 2009 and this is the first Canadian report of golimumab’s utilization in a real-world setting.  The purpose of this project was to assess the utilization patterns of rheumatoid arthritis patients who received golimumab (GLM), etanercept (ETA) or adalimumab (ADA) in a large private drug plans database.

Methods: RA patients initiating therapy with GLM, ETA or ADA between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 were selected from the IMS Brogan Canadian private drug plans database. Patients were included if they had ≥ 3 claims for GLM, ETA or ADA and were naïve to biologics prior to initiation of treatment. The 6-month period preceding the first GLM, ETA or ADA claim (index date) for each patient was used as a baseline to ensure that the patient were naïve to biologics. Patients were tracked for a maximum of 12 months after their index date to assess dosing patterns. The average dose in mg/week and the % of discontinuation (defined as the gap between 2 consecutive claims exceeding 60 days or switching to another drug) were evaluated.

Results: A total of 146, 1436 and 1171 RA patients receiving at least three prescriptions of GLM, ETA or ADA respectively were identified. Within the period of analysis, patients treated with ETA had a numerically higher discontinuation rate (44%) followed by ADA patients (41%) whereas patients treated with GLM had the lowest discontinuation rate (34%).  The average dose of GLM, ETA or ADA were respectively 51.6 mg/month, 46.7 mg/week and 42 mg/q2weeks in accordance with their respective label in Canada for RA.

Figure 1. Treatment discontinuation rate within a period of 12 month following initiation (Bionaïve at initiation)

Conclusion: Results of these descriptive claims analyses show that in a real-world setting, the use of golimumab in RA patient’s naïve to biologics is in accordance with the approved dose of 50 mg/month and that a numerically higher drug survival rate is observed for GLM (76%) compared to ETA and ADA 1 year after initiation of treatment. This is the first time that drug utilization patterns of GLM in comparison to ETA and ADA is reported in a real-world setting.  Further research is needed to compare the relationship between drug utilization patterns on healthcare resource utilization and outcomes.  


Disclosure:

H. Khalil,

Janssen Canada Inc,

3;

A. Tahami,

Janssen Canada Inc.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/golimumab-drug-utilization-patterns-in-canada-higher-retention-rate-in-golimumab-treated-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-compared-to-etanercept-and-adalimumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology