ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1098

Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Testing in a US Veterans Healthcare System: Are We Ordering Unnecessary Tests?

Tracy Driver1, Kevin Hsu2, Meika A. Fang3 and Ari Weinreb3, 1Medicine, Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 3VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Drug safety and health care cost

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is an X-linked genetic defect that causes a non-immune hemolytic anemia affecting more than 400 million people worldwide. When initiating medications with oxidant potential such as sulfasalazine (SSZ), patients are frequently tested for G6PD deficiency. The objectives of this study include determining the prevalence of G6PD deficiency among those tested and characterizing G6PD test ordering patterns.

Methods:

Retrospective chart review was performed using the electronic medical record at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System. The database was searched for all patients who had a G6PD test ordered between 2009-2014. Data collected included demographics, reasons G6PD testing was done, number of patients who underwent repeat testing, and the specialty of the provider who ordered the test. Prevalence of G6PD deficiency was determined. Descriptive analysis of categorical variables was done with the Chi-Square test. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the association between ethnicity and G6PD deficiency.

Results:

G6PD levels were measured in 737 patients. The study population included 661 males (89.7%) and 76 females (10.3%) with a mean age of 56.6 (± SD 14.9). There were 60 (8.1%) patients with G6PD deficiency. The percentage of patients with G6PD deficiency by gender and within each self-reported race/ethnicity was as follows: 8.4% (N=56) males, 5.3% (N=4) females, 18.2% (N=2) American Indian, 17.9% (N=47) African American, 7.7% (N=2) Asian, 2.5% (N=7) Caucasian, 1.1% (N=1) Hispanic, and 100% (N=1) Brazilian. Observed differences in G6PD deficiency prevalence were statistically significant based on gender and self-reported race/ethnicity (p<0.001 for both). Odds ratios were calculated to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and G6PD deficiency: African American (OR 7.77, [95% CI 4.12-14.66]), American Indian (OR 2.56, [95% CI 0.54-12.12]), Asian (OR 0.94, [95% CI 0.22-4.07]), Caucasian (OR 0.20, [95% CI 0.09-0.45]), and Hispanic (OR 0.11, [95% CI 0.02-0.82]). Repeated testing was carried out in 105 (14.2%) patients. Reasons for G6PD testing included initiation of SSZ for inflammatory arthritis (52.3%), dapsone for PCP prophylaxis (14.2%), and anemia workup (11.1%). Rheumatology ordered the majority of repeat tests (60.7%) for the following reasons: SSZ (65), hydroxychloroquine initiation (1), anemia workup (4), and dapsone initiation (4).

Conclusion:

G6PD deficiency occurred in 8% of our study population, mainly in African Americans, American Indians, and Asians. Rheumatologists ordered most of the tests measuring G6PD levels primarily before considering SSZ therapy and were more likely to order duplicate tests when compared to other specialists. Unnecessary repeat testing is an issue that could be reduced with pop-up computer reminder. This study supports G6PD deficiency testing for high risk populations, including African Americans, American Indians, and Asians, but routine screening of all rheumatology patients for G6PD deficiency when considering SSZ therapy may not be needed.


Disclosure: T. Driver, None; K. Hsu, None; M. A. Fang, None; A. Weinreb, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Driver T, Hsu K, Fang MA, Weinreb A. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Testing in a US Veterans Healthcare System: Are We Ordering Unnecessary Tests? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-testing-in-a-us-veterans-healthcare-system-are-we-ordering-unnecessary-tests/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-testing-in-a-us-veterans-healthcare-system-are-we-ordering-unnecessary-tests/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology