ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0668

Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effects and Flare Suppression: Metformin Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Takeshi Suzuki, Yoshiki Ishizaki, Takayasu Ando, Shotaro Suzuki, Keiichi Sakurai, Kumiko Tonooka, Yukiko Takakuwa, Hiroko Nagafuchi, Seido Ooka and Kimito Kawahata, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: glucocorticoids, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0641–0670) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: While both metformin (MET) and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have potential immunomodulatory effects in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), their comparative efficacy in glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing remains unclear. This study aims to compare GC discontinuation and flare suppression between MET and SGLT2i in SLE patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX’s Global collaborative network. We defined a cohort of SLE patients (ICD-10 M32) prescribed hydroxychloroquine and with anti-dsDNA antibody testing. Within this cohort, patients initiating glucocorticoid treatment (prednisolone or prednisone) were then categorized into two distinct groups for analysis: the MET group, comprising those subsequently prescribed metformin, and the SGLT2i group, comprising those subsequently prescribed a SGLT2i after glucocorticoid exposure. The primary endpoint was GC discontinuation (defined as no GC prescriptions) within a 3-12 month period following the index prescription of MET or an SGLT2i. Primary outcome sensitivity analyses focused on GC tablets ≤5 mg, with additional analyses in the glucocorticoid ≤5 mg tablet group when MET or SGLT2 inhibitors were subsequently prescribed. The secondary endpoint, assessed in patients from both groups who had discontinued GC, was GC reinitiation within a 3-month to 3-year period. The primary endpoint was compared between groups using the Chi-squared test. For the secondary endpoint, comparisons were made after propensity score matching (age, sex, race, BMI, anti-dsDNA antibody, complements, MMF, Belimumab, Anifrolumab, Diabetes mellitus, HbA1c, Heart failure, End-stage renal disease, Chronic kidney disease, unspecified) utilizing the TriNetX platform.

Results: MET was initiated in 1228 patients, with 89.5% being women, and the mean age was 56 ± 14 years. SGLT2i was initiated in 718 patients, with 82.4% being women, and the mean age was 55±17 years. The duration of SLE disease before the first prescription of MET and SGLT2i was 1827 ± 1386 and 2593 ± 1608 days, respectively. Mycophenolic acid use was 71% in the SGLT2i group and 53% in the MET group. Baseline HbA1c levels were numerically higher in the MET group (6.3 ± 1.4%) than in the SGLT2i group (5.8 ± 1.13%). Among these patients, GC was discontinued in 445 (36.2%) patients in the MET group and in 488 (68.4%) patients in the SGLT2i group. GC discontinuation was significantly more frequent in the SGLT2i group (p < 0.001; Odds Ratio [OR] 3.85, 95% CI 3.23-4.60). The sensitivity analyses corroborated the primary results. After propensity score matching of patients who had discontinued GC, 248 patients remained in each group for the secondary endpoint analysis. In this propensity score-matched cohort, the GC reinitiation rate within 3 months to 3 years after GC discontinuation was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group (10.1%) compared to the MET group (23.0%) (p < 0.0001; OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.60-4.43).

Conclusion: In SLE patients treated with GC, SGLT2i use was associated with a significantly higher rate of GC discontinuation and a lower rate of subsequent GC reinitiation compared to MET. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may offer a superior GC-sparing effect in SLE patients.


Disclosures: T. Suzuki: None; Y. Ishizaki: None; T. Ando: None; S. Suzuki: None; K. Sakurai: None; K. Tonooka: None; Y. Takakuwa: None; H. Nagafuchi: None; S. Ooka: None; K. Kawahata: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Suzuki T, Ishizaki Y, Ando T, Suzuki S, Sakurai K, Tonooka K, Takakuwa Y, Nagafuchi H, Ooka S, Kawahata K. Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effects and Flare Suppression: Metformin Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucocorticoid-sparing-effects-and-flare-suppression-metformin-versus-sglt2-inhibitors-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucocorticoid-sparing-effects-and-flare-suppression-metformin-versus-sglt2-inhibitors-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology