ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2509

Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment: A Gender Comparison in a Cohort of Patients with Underlying Rheumatologic Diagnosis in a Tertiary Care Setting

Hajra Shah1, Narender Annapureddy2 and Ruchi Jain1, 1Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: osteoporosis, quality improvement and steroids

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: One-fourth of hip fractures occur
in men. Men treated with oral glucocorticoids for at least 3 months are
particularly at risk. Studies have suggested that rapid bone loss begins early
in steroid use, peaks at 6 months and slows with continued usage. Inflammatory disease
induced hypogonadism may also increase fracture risk by lowering testosterone
secretion. Male patients over the age of 50, especially with chronic rheumatic diseases
on long term steroids may not be receiving adequate osteoporosis screening or
treatment compared to females.

Methods:   An IRB approved retrospective chart review was
performed to identify male patients ≥ 50 years with a rheumatic diagnosis
to compare them to age matched women in our academic practice from 2010 to
2013. Inclusion criteria were patients on any dose of prednisone for ≥ 3
months and at least 3 clinic visits. Exclusion criteria were recognized osteoporosis
and prior bisphosphonate use. Demographic data, dose and length of steroid use,
timing of DXA from initiation of prednisone use, T-score and calcium and
vitamin D supplementation use was collected. Optimal care was defined as screening
with a baseline DXA within 6 months of initiation of prednisone, calcium and
vitamin D supplementation and osteoporosis treatment or prophylaxis when
indicated. Patients not meeting these criteria were defined as receiving
sub-optimal care. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables.
A binary logistic regression model was run to account for any differences that
age, ethnicity or diagnosis may have on the outcomes between the two groups.

Results: 100 male patients met the inclusion criteria.
100 women were then randomly age matched to the men. Average age was 63.4 vs 66
(M:F); 50% vs 52% (M:F) were African American and 31% vs 32% (M:F) had
Rheumatoid Arthritis. 82% of females were on calcium-vitamin D vs 53% of men (P<
0.001). 82% of women had T-scores available vs 57% of men. DXA readers ordered
more scans. Faculty < 5 years from training provided more optimal care. (61%
vs 33% (> 5 years); p < 0.001). Osteoporosis screening for vasculitis
spectrum diseases was more likely compared to other diseases in both groups.
(Figure 1) Overall 67% woman received
optimal care in comparison to 22 % men (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is the first
to analyze trends primarily in patients with chronic inflammatory disease in a large
academic rheumatology practice. Physicians who were DXA readers for the clinic
were more likely to order a DXA although notably not better with optimal care.  Recent
graduates were better at osteoporosis management overall. Men were 8 times
less
likely to receive optimal osteoporosis management as compared to women.
This highlights gender gaps in management of osteoporosis in a vulnerable
population with inflammatory diseases taking steroids.

 

Figure 1

 

 


Disclosure: H. Shah, None; N. Annapureddy, None; R. Jain, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shah H, Annapureddy N, Jain R. Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment: A Gender Comparison in a Cohort of Patients with Underlying Rheumatologic Diagnosis in a Tertiary Care Setting [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucocorticoid-induced-osteoporosis-screening-and-treatment-a-gender-comparison-in-a-cohort-of-patients-with-underlying-rheumatologic-diagnosis-in-a-tertiary-care-setting/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/glucocorticoid-induced-osteoporosis-screening-and-treatment-a-gender-comparison-in-a-cohort-of-patients-with-underlying-rheumatologic-diagnosis-in-a-tertiary-care-setting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology