ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0301

Genetic Associations and Polygenic Risk Assessment in Incomplete Lupus Erythematosus

Matthew Slief1, Jeremy Levin2, Susan Macwana1, Wade DeJager1, Rebecka Bourn3, Swapan Nath3, Melissa Munroe4, Teresa Aberle1, Patrick Gaffney5, Joan Merrill3, Judith James6 and Joel Guthridge1, 1Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2OU Medical Center, Oklahoma City, 3Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, 4Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation/Progentec Diagnostics, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK, 5Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 6Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation;Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center;Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Edmond, OK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: classification criteria, genetics, Genome Wide Association Studies, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have features of lupus, but have insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some ILE patients transition to classified SLE, but the majority remain ILE without major organ involvement. ILE presumably shares genetic associations with SLE, while unique ILE variants or reduced genetic load may influence a more mild disease course. This study aims to identify variants associated with ILE through genome-wide association study (GWAS) and compare genetic load of ILE patients, SLE patients, and unaffected individuals.

Methods: ILE was defined as 3 ACR-1997 SLE criteria (ILEACR) and SLE as ≥4 ACR-1997 criteria by standardized medical record review. The subset of ILEACR who also did not meet SLE classification by SLICC criteria were designated ILESLICC. Study participants were genotyped on the Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA). After quality control, association testing included 335 ILEACR patients and 236 controls of diverse ancestry without self-reported lupus manifestations (Table). Principal components were included as logistic regression covariates. For genetic load calculations, genotypes were pre-phased and imputed against 1000 Genomes Project haplotypes. Risk alleles that showed association with European SLE in Langefeld, et al (Nat Comm, 2017) (pFDR< 0.05) were identified in unrelated European American (EA) patients with SLE, ILEACR, ILESLICC, and controls (Table). Genetic loads were computed for each person as the number of risk alleles (unweighted) and allele sum with each allele weighted by its beta coefficient (weighted).

Results: Through GWAS in the ancestrally diverse population of ILEACR and controls, 12 variants exceeded the suggestive level of significance (p < 1 × 10−5). Eight were not previously reported in SLE (DPP10-DDX18, LRP1B, HMHB1-YIPF5, PHF14-THSD7A, ABCA1, DMRTA1-LINC01239, LOC105369443-CNTN5, and MIR3649-ADIPOR2), involving genes associated with phospholipid metabolism, asthma, Behçet disease, and cancers. No variants reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) in this small study. EA ILEACR, ILESLICC, and SLE patients had significantly greater unweighted and weighted genetic load than controls (p < 0.001) (p < 0.001) and (p < 0.01) (Table), respectively. There was no significant difference between mean genetic load (weighted or unweighted) in ILE and SLE, and weighted genetic load did not significantly differentiate between ILEACR and SLE in receiver operator characteristics analysis (area under the curve = 0.52). Further, those with a weighted genetic load of 81.0 (+/-2.0) or higher had greater odds of being SLE or ILE vs. healthy control (odds ratios >5.4-6.3), compared to individuals in the lowest weighted genetic load decile (Figure 1-C). However, weighted genetic load did not significantly affect odds of having SLE vs. ILEACR (Figure 1D).

Conclusion: ILE and SLE patients have similar genetic loads of SLE risk loci, suggesting a similar genetic predisposition between these conditions. Suggestive associations for novel loci are identified in ILE patients which require replication and validation. Phenotypic differences may be influenced by novel ILE variants and gene-environment interaction.

Table 1. Demographic Information and Genetic Load for the samples passing quality control for GWAS and genetic load calculations. n/a: not applicable. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. control. For ILE vs. SLE comparisons, p>0.05.

Figure 1. Odds ratio across genetic load range. The odds ratio represents the odds that an individual with a given genetic load (+/-2.0) will have SLE vs control (A), ILE(ACR) vs control (B), ILE(SLICC) vs control (C), or SLE vs ILE(ACR) (D), compared to a baseline comparison group of individuals in the lowest decile for weighted genetic load.


Disclosure: M. Slief, None; J. Levin, None; S. Macwana, None; W. DeJager, None; R. Bourn, None; S. Nath, None; M. Munroe, Progentec Diagnostics, Inc., 2, 9; T. Aberle, None; P. Gaffney, None; J. Merrill, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Aurinia, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Remegen, 5, Janssen, 5, Provention, 5, UCB, 5; J. James, Progentec Diagnostics, Inc., 9; J. Guthridge, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Slief M, Levin J, Macwana S, DeJager W, Bourn R, Nath S, Munroe M, Aberle T, Gaffney P, Merrill J, James J, Guthridge J. Genetic Associations and Polygenic Risk Assessment in Incomplete Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genetic-associations-and-polygenic-risk-assessment-in-incomplete-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genetic-associations-and-polygenic-risk-assessment-in-incomplete-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology