ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1505

Gender Bias in the Inheritance of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Karim Doughem1, Michael Weisman2, Lianne S. Gensler3, Mohammad H. Rahbar4, MinJae Lee4, Laura A. Diekman5, Matt Brown6, Michael Ward7 and John D. Reveille5, 1Rheumatology, The University of Texas-McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 2Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Division of Rheumatology, Los Angeles, CA, 3Medicine/Rheumatology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 4Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design (BERD) Core | Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas-McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 5Rheumatology, University of Texas-McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 6Translational Genomics Group, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia, Brisbane, Australia, 7NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: family studies, genetics and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

There are few studies of the heritability of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in families, a disease where hereditary factors play a dominant role in disease pathogenesis. One study (Calin et al, Lancet 1999; 354: 1687-90) showed that in families with affected parent: offspring pairs, the mother was more likely to be affected compared to the father. This study aims to better understand the pattern of inheritance of this disease in familial AS and to determine whether exists gender bias in disease inheritance in parent: offspring pairs in familial AS.

Methods:

Two cohorts were examined comprising 105 affected parent:offspring pairs, including one taken from 865 AS patients meeting modified New York Criteria enrolled in a longitudinal study of outcome who were administered a questionnaire querying spondyloarthritis symptoms in their first degree relatives (the proband recall cohort) and a second from 210 AS probands enrolled in a study of familial AS genetics, where the diagnoses were confirmed by either review of pelvic radiographs of affected family members or by radiographic reports thereof (the radiographic cohort). We tested whether the proportion of affected fathers was same as that of affected mothers and also evaluated the gender association between affected parents and offspring by conducting a test of one sample proportion and Chi-square test, respectively, at a 5% level of significance. All parent:offspring pairs were HLA-B27 positive.

Results: Overall, in 105 parent:offspring pairs, the father was the more likely affected parent after combining the parent: offspring pairs from the proband recall and the radiographic cohorts (p = 0.003). In the proband recall cohort there were 54 parent:offspring pairs and the father was more likely to be the affected parent compared to the mother (p = 0.007). In the radiographic cohort there were 51 affected parent: offspring pairs. Here a trend was also seen for greater paternal involvement, although the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.12).

Next it was tested whether affected parents are more likely to transmit the disease to their same or opposite gender offspring. In the radiographic cohort, the father and son were affected in 26 of 55 (47%) of father:offspring pairs whereas there in an affected mother:son pair in 12 of 24 (50%) of mother:offspring pairs (p = 0.40). Similar results were seen in the proband recall cohort-28/36 (77%) father:son versus 12/17 (71%) affected mother:son pairs, or in the combined cohorts (p = 0.07). Overall, sons were more likely to be affected than daughters (p = 0.0003) in the proband recall and combined cohorts.

Conclusion: In affected parent:offspring pairs with AS, the father is more likely to be affected than the mother, and there is greater likelihood for transmission to male versus female offspring, perhaps reflecting the male gender bias known to exist in this disease. There were no significant differences in parental transmission AS to same gender versus opposite gender offspring.


[L


Disclosure: K. Doughem, None; M. Weisman, None; L. S. Gensler, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Amgen, 2,UCB, 2,AbbVie, 2; M. H. Rahbar, None; M. Lee, None; L. A. Diekman, None; M. Brown, None; M. Ward, None; J. D. Reveille, Janssen, Novartis, 5,UCB, Eli Lilly, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Doughem K, Weisman M, Gensler LS, Rahbar MH, Lee M, Diekman LA, Brown M, Ward M, Reveille JD. Gender Bias in the Inheritance of Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gender-bias-in-the-inheritance-of-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gender-bias-in-the-inheritance-of-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology