ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2858

Gaps in Patient Safety Performance before Treatment with Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs or Tofacitinib in a Large Academic Healthcare System

Sarah L. Patterson1, Michael Evans2, Ishita Aggarwal3, Zara Izadi4, Milena Gianfrancesco5, Gabriela Schmajuk6 and Jinoos Yazdany7, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, 4Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 5Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 6San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 7University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, Infection, medication and quality improvement, Safety issues

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T106 ACR Abstract: Measures of Healthcare Quality I: QI in RA (2856–2861)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and tofacitinib confer increased risk of life-threatening infections, including reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We aimed to assess gaps in patient safety measures such as LTBI and hepatitis screening prior to drug initiation among patients treated with biologic DMARDs or tofacitinib in a large health system across multiple specialties.

Methods: We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from a university center, including diagnosis codes, problem lists, medications, laboratories, procedures, clinical notes, and scanned documents. Patients included all new users of a biologic DMARD (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra,  canakinumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, tociluzimab,  or ustekinumab) or tofacitinib  between 7/1/13 and 10/1/17. We assessed screening for each infection: LTBI (fulfilled via tuberculin skin test, interferon gamma release assay, or prior treatment for TB); HBV (hepatitis B surface antigen); and HCV (Hepatitis C antibody) from 12 months preceding through 60 days after medication initiation.  Next, we calculated performance on a composite safety measure that required screening for all 3 infections. We then liberalized the screening window to include any time prior to medication initiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in screening across prescribing specialties, adjusting for race, sex, age, and comorbidities.

Results: We included 1,029 patients; mean age was 39.5 (SD 19.5), mean Charlson score 1.1 (SD 2.1), and 64% were White, 13% Hispanic, 12% Asian, 4% African American, and 22% other/not reported. Rheumatology was the most common prescribing specialty (Table) and the most common drugs prescribed were adalimumab (32%), etanercept (24%), infliximab (19%), and ustekinumab (9%). Overall, 62% of patients were screened for LTBI, 42% for HBV, 33% for HCV, and only 26% for all 3 infections within 12 months preceding through 60 days after initiation of an eligible drug. When we assessed screening at any time before drug initiation, the proportions screened were: 68% for LTBI, 55% for HBV, 46% for HCV, and 36% for all 3. Screening patterns differed by treating specialty (p<0.0001) (Table).

Conclusion:

Screening for LTBI and hepatitis B and C among patients initiating biologic DMARDs or tofacitinib in a large health system is suboptimal. More robust safety protocols are needed across specialties to ensure adequate screening and prevent adverse drug events in this high-risk population.

Performance on Composite Patient Safety Measure

(Screening for LTBI, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C), by Treating Specialty

 

N (%)

Unadjusted Performance*

Adjusted Performance** (95% CI)

All clinics

1,029

26.0%

n/a

Rheumatology

265 (25.8%)

32.8%

31.7% (25.9, 37.5)

Dermatology

277 (22.1%)

35.2%

35.8% (29.2, 42.3)

Gastroenterology

211 (20.5%)

21.3%

21.9% (16.2, 27.6)

Pediatrics subspecialties

160 (15.6%)

1.3%

1.5% (0.0, 3.6)

Oncology

10 (1.0%)

20.0%

14.8% (0.0, 34.9)

Other specialties

156 (15.2%)

33.3%

30.7% (23.1, 38.4)

*Proportion of patients who completed screening for LTBI, HBV, and HCV within 12 months before or 60 days after starting a new biologic DMARD or tofacitinib.

**Adjusted proportions calculated based on multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, race, sex, and Charlson comorbidity score.

 


Disclosure: S. L. Patterson, None; M. Evans, None; I. Aggarwal, None; Z. Izadi, None; M. Gianfrancesco, None; G. Schmajuk, None; J. Yazdany, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Patterson SL, Evans M, Aggarwal I, Izadi Z, Gianfrancesco M, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Gaps in Patient Safety Performance before Treatment with Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs or Tofacitinib in a Large Academic Healthcare System [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gaps-in-patient-safety-performance-before-treatment-with-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-or-tofacitinib-in-a-large-academic-healthcare-system/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gaps-in-patient-safety-performance-before-treatment-with-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-or-tofacitinib-in-a-large-academic-healthcare-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology