ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 270

Gaps in Knowledge about the Ontario Trillium Drug Program

Ambika Gupta1, Heather Khey Beldman2, Caroline Averns3 and Henry Averns3, 1Internal Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 3Private Practice, Kingston, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic drugs and funding, DMARDs, Public Health Approach

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Medication costs for patients with a rheumatic disease can add up as they may be on numerous and/or costly medications including anti-inflammatory medications, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or biologic medications. The number of biologic medications available to treat rheumatic diseases has steadily increased over the last decade. Biologic medications generally cost over 10,000 Canadian dollars annually. In Ontario, Canada, the Trillium Drug Program (TDP) funds patients who approximately spend greater than 4% of their after-tax household income on prescription drugs. From 2005 to 2015, the TDP has increased its coverage of medications that cost greater than $10,000 annually, from 20 to 124 medications, respectively.1 However, the gaps in knowledge about the TDP is not clear among resident physicians and patients. The purpose of the study was to determine what resident physicians and patients know about the TDP.

Methods: This research survey project was approved by the Queen’s University Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Qualtrics survey software was used to distribute anonymous questionnaires to Queen’s University residents (family medicine and core internal medicine) and patients at a private rheumatology clinic. Two types of patient surveys were completed: a general patient questionnaire and a specific questionnaire for patients on expensive biologic medications.

Results: 50/55 residents have heard of the TDP but only 11/50 residents know how a patient would apply for it. The general patient survey revealed that 18/27 patients have heard of the TDP but only 2/18 patients know how to apply for it. Of these two patients, one patient has applied. The other patient did not think that they would qualify for it and so has not applied. The survey of patients on expensive medications revealed that 3/7 patients have a private drug plan and 6/7 patients have heard of the TDP. All six of these patients have heard of this program through a healthcare professional. 5/6 of the patients know how to apply for the TDP. 4 of these 5 patients has applied to the TDP and one has not as they do not think they need it.

Conclusion: The survey results reveal that resident physicians and patients generally do not know how to apply to the TDP, although they have heard of the program. On the other hand, the patients who are on expensive medications generally do know how to apply to the TDP and have done so. This is likely due to guidance by a healthcare professional. Due to these gaps in knowledge about the TDP, we have created an information sheet to educate patients about the TDP.

Reference:

  1. Tadrous M, Greaves S, Martins D et al. Catastrophic drug coverage: utilization insights from the Ontario Trillium Drug Program. CMAJ [Internet]. 2018 Mar 26;6(1):E132-E138. Available from: http://cmajopen.ca/content/6/1/E132.full#ref-18

Disclosure: A. Gupta, None; H. Khey Beldman, None; C. Averns, None; H. Averns, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gupta A, Khey Beldman H, Averns C, Averns H. Gaps in Knowledge about the Ontario Trillium Drug Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gaps-in-knowledge-about-the-ontario-trillium-drug-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gaps-in-knowledge-about-the-ontario-trillium-drug-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology