ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1636

Frequency and Specificity of MRI Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis and Non-Specific Back Pain: First Analysis of MRI Scans from the Assessments in Spondyloarthritis International Society Classification Cohort

Walter P. Maksymowych1,2, Susanne J Pedersen3, Xenofon Baraliakos4, Pedro Machado5, Ulrich Weber6, Joachim Sieper7, Stephanie Wichuk1, Denis Poddubnyy7, Mikkel Østergaard3, Joel Paschke2 and Robert G. Lambert8, 1Medicine, Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2CaRE Arthritis, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 3COPECARE University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany, 5University College London, London, United Kingdom, 6University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 7Charité Universitätsmeidzin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 8Radiology, Radiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: diagnosis and spondylarthritis, MRI

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Clinical/Epidemiology Studies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

A broad spectrum of MRI lesions has been described in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) of patients with axial spondyloarthritis and a recent consensus from the ASAS MRI group has culminated in updated lesion definitions (ASAS_MRI_defn). There has been no detailed evaluation of MRI scans from the ASAS Classification Cohort (ASAS-CC)1 to determine the spectrum of MRI lesions in the SIJ in this cohort according to these definitions. We conducted a multi-reader exercise of ASAS-CC MRI scans comprising 7 experts from the ASAS-MRI group to compare the frequencies and specificity of different lesion types according to diagnostic category.


Methods:

ASAS_MRI_defn were recorded in an eCRF that comprises global assessment (lesion present/absent), links to reference images, and detailed scoring (SPARCC SIJ inflammation, SPARCC SIJ structural). MRI images were available from 278 of the 495 cases that had MRI performed in the ASAS-CC and were available in a variety of formats (DICOM (n =175), JPEG (n =71), DICOM film (n =32)) and sequences, axial and semicoronal orientations. Image quality was considered sufficient for global assessment in all cases by all readers. Detailed SPARCC scoring data was based only on assessment of images in DICOM format (n =175). Comparison of active and structural lesion frequencies was assessed according to individual and majority agreement (≥4/7 readers) data. MRI lesions were compared between axial SpA and non-axial SpA back pain patients according to diagnostic ascertainment by local rheumatologists.


Results:

Active and structural lesions discriminated equally well between axSpA and non-axSpA patients, and the frequency of active and structural lesions in each subgroup of patients was comparable. SPARCC BME, erosion, and fatty lesion scores were significantly higher in those with axSpA (Table). 8.6% and 11.4% of axSpA and non-axSpA, respectively, had subchondral BME which was not deemed typical of axSpA. Inflammation in the erosion cavity and enthesitis were only reported in axSpA. Erosion was the most frequently observed structural lesion (36.6%) followed by fatty lesion (25.2%) in patients with axSpA with <5% of non-axSpA having these lesions.


Conclusion:

In this first central reader analysis of MRI images from the ASAS-CC we demonstrate similar frequencies of active and structural lesions typical of axSpA. Erosions and fatty lesions are common structural lesions in axSpA. Some degree of subchondral inflammation, which was not considered typical of axSpA, was also detected, both in axSpA and non-axSpA.

1. Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 777-831.

Table. Frequencies of MRI lesions in the SIJ in the ASAS-CC (majority reader (≥4/7) data).

 

Variable

Local Rheumatologist Diagnosis

P VALUE

AxSpA (n=199)

NOT AxSpA (n=77)

Active lesions typical of axSpA and meets ASAS definition for positive MRI

85 (42.7%)

2 (2.6%)

<0.0001

Subchondral inflammation

102 (51.3%)

10 (13.0%)

<0.0001

Inflammation in erosion cavity

20 (7.2%)

0 (0%)

0.0014

Capsulitis

8 (2.9%)

0 (0%)

0.11

Joint Fluid

16 (8.0%)

2 (2.6%)

0.17

Enthesitis

14 (5.0%)

0 (0%)

0.013

SPARCC BME score, mean (SD)

5.9 (11.8)

 

0.4 (0.6)

 

0.0006

Structural lesions typical of axSpA

69 (39.4%)

6 (9.7%)

<0.0001

Structural lesions typical of axSpA and level of confidence ≥3 (scale of 1-4)

(-4(not SpA) to +4 (SpA) NRS scale)

48 (27.4%)

2 (3.2%)

<0.0001

Subchondral sclerosis

32 (18.3%)

8 (12.9%)

0.26

Erosion

64 (36.6%)

3 (4.8%)

<0.0001

Fatty lesion (any)

44 (25.1%)

3 (4.8%)

0.0001

Fatty lesion (>1cm)

20 (11.4%)

3 (4.8%)

0.14

Bone bud (yes)

1 (0.6%)

0 (0%)

1.00

Fat metaplasia in joint space

16 (9.1%)

2 (3.2%)

0.17

Ankylosis

6 (3.4%)

0 (0%)

0.19

SPARCC erosion score, mean (SD)

2.7 (4.8)

0.7 (2.2)

0.0032

SPARCC fatty lesion (any), mean (SD)

3.0 (6.1)

0.6 (3.5)

0.0065

SPARCC fatty lesion (>1cm), mean (SD)

1.4 (3.7)

0.3 (2.3)

0.041

SPARCC sclerosis, mean (SD)

1.8 (4.1)

1.5 (5.5)

0.69

SPARCC backfill, mean (SD)

0.6 (3.9)

0.01 (0.06)

0.26

SPARCC ankylosis, mean (SD)

0.06 (0.2)

0.04 (0.2)

0.54

 


Disclosure: W. P. Maksymowych, CaRE rthritis, 9; S. J. Pedersen, None; X. Baraliakos, None; P. Machado, None; U. Weber, None; J. Sieper, None; S. Wichuk, None; D. Poddubnyy, None; M. Østergaard, None; J. Paschke, None; R. G. Lambert, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych WP, Pedersen SJ, Baraliakos X, Machado P, Weber U, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Poddubnyy D, Østergaard M, Paschke J, Lambert RG. Frequency and Specificity of MRI Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis and Non-Specific Back Pain: First Analysis of MRI Scans from the Assessments in Spondyloarthritis International Society Classification Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-and-specificity-of-mri-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-of-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis-and-non-specific-back-pain-first-analysis-of-mri-scans-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthr/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-and-specificity-of-mri-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-of-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis-and-non-specific-back-pain-first-analysis-of-mri-scans-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthr/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology