ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 355

Fracture Incidence Rates in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Raveendhara R. Bannuru1, Elizaveta Vaysbrot2, Mikala Osani2, Lenore Buckley3, Howard Fink4 and Timothy E. McAlindon5, 1Rheumatology, Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Yale University, North Haven, CT, 4Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Washington, DC, 5Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Fracture risk, osteoporosis and transplantation

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Transplants increase risk of bone loss and fractures and reduce quality of life. Information on fracture incidence is important when making clinical decisions about initiating anti-osteoporotic treatment and when assessing treatment success. No existing fracture assessment tool accounts for the additional risk transplant patients may experience over time. With this study, we aimed to estimate fracture incidence rates in transplant patients and present them in a uniform way, which could aid clinicians in making personalized patient care decisions.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed from inception to May 2016 for all observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving solid organ transplant recipients and reporting on osteoporotic fractures. We included RCT data from groups which received no anti-osteoporotic treatment or were treated with calcium and vitamin D. Studies involving >50% bisphosphonate users were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted data on hip, vertebral (morphometric /clinical), non-vertebral, and total fractures. We calculated fracture incidence rates per 1000 patient-years (PY) for each study and combined them using a random effects meta-analysis model.  

Results: We included 42 studies (N=280,066, 99% were kidney transplant) (Table 1). Time since transplantation varied across studies (3 months-11.5 years; median 1 year).   A majority of transplant recipients were started on pulse IV steroids, followed by high dose oral corticosteroids, which were tapered within 3-6 months. Most incident fractures were reported within one year post-transplant across all studies. Kidney transplant recipients experienced high risk of hip fracture (4 per 1000 PY) (Table 2). We also found a very high risk of vertebral (morphometric/clinical) fracture (81 per 1000 PY) in heart transplant recipients.  Liver transplant recipients experienced high risks of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures (86 and 31 per 1000 PY, respectively).

Conclusion: This study found a high fracture risk in transplant recipients, especially within the first post-transplant year. Our results will support informed decision-making regarding anti-osteoporotic treatment and will aid policy makers in formulating standards of care.  Current evidence is heterogeneous in terms of variables such as patient characteristics and follow-up. Researchers studying post-transplant care should aim for a homogeneous study design, which will enable precise estimation of fracture rates and treatment effects, as well as investigation of factors relating to variability in fracture risk among transplant recipients.  

Table 1: Patient Characteristics
Author, year N of patients, Female (%) Mean age, years Steroid regimen Other Immunosuppressant use Calcium and Vitamin D use Bisphosphonate use (%) Mean time from transplant, years

Kidney

Akaberi, 2008 238; 38.7 51 Steroids in 98%; median long-term prednisolone dose 5 mg Cyclosporine in 82%, Tacrolimus in 14% Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 73.8% 12.8 Median 3.5
Ball, 2002 59,944; 39.2 42% <40, 38% 40-54 ND ND ND ND ND
Durieux, 2002 59; 45.8 49.6 Prednisone 20 mg/day, tapered to 10 mg/day by 4-6 months after transplant; mean cumulative dose 37.7g Azathioprine 92%, Cyclosporine 46% ND (not excluded; mean dietary Calcium intake 906 mg) 0 8.5
Grotz, 1994 100; 46 44 ND ND 0% for Vitamin D, 6% took Calcium (500 mg/day) ND 5.25
Marcen, 2007 40; 40 41.8 Prednisone in 100% Cyclosporine ND ND 10.8
Nair, 2014 69,740; 39 51 Steroids in 91% Cyclosporine: 26% Tacrolimus: 64%, Mofetil Mycophenolate: 82% ND ND 2.2
Nikkel, 2009 68,814; 39.7 43.6 ND ND ND ND 5
Nikkel, 2012 77,430; 39.7 49.0 Compared patients with (n=11,164) and without (n=66,266) early corticosteroid withdrawal ND ND ND 4
Pichette, 1996 70; 34.3 46.1 Prednisone mean dose 0.19 mg/kg every other day or 0.11 mg/kg/day Cyclosporine or Azathioprine Vitamin D in 26% and Vitamin D and Calcium in 16% ND 8.1
Vautour, 2004 86; 31 38.3 Steroids in 100% Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, or Azathioprine ND ND Median 10.6
Coco, 2012 (RCT) 22; 28 48 All patients received prednisone 20 mg/day tapered to 5 mg/day by 90 days post-transplant Tacrolimus (or Cyclosporine, <10% patients), Rapamycin, and Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (as needed) and Calcitriol (0.
25 μg/day)
0 (Patients received an oral placebo) Immediately post-transplant, 1 year follow-up
Cueto-Manzano, 2000 (RCT) 30; 47 48 All patients received prednisone 20 mg/day for 90 days tapered to 5-10 mg/day (mean dose 6.1 mg/day for Calcium and D patients and 4.6 mg/day for Control patients) Cyclosporine: 43% Azathioprine: 40% Cyclosporine and Azathioprine: 17% Calcium (500 mg/day) and Calcitriol (0.25 μg/day) in 53% of patients 0 10.5
De Sevaux, 2002 (RCT) 111; 41 47 100 mg/day IV prednisone for first 3 days post-transplant, 0.35 mg/kg/day for the first month, then tapered to 0.10 mg/kg/day at 3 months (mean daily dose 7.2 mg) Cyclosporine (or Azathioprine for select patients) and Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Alfacalcidol (0.25 μg/day) in 41% of patients 0 Immediately post-transplant, 6 month follow-up
Smerud, 2012 (RCT) 63; 19 52.6 All patients received prednisolone. Mean cumulative dose over one year: 5,315 mg Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus and Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (500 mg twice a day) and Calcitriol (0.25 μg/day) 0 (Patients received an IV placebo) 0.051
Torregrosa, 2007 (RCT) 45; 51 55 All patients received prednisone: 5-7.5 mg/day Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus with or w/o Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (2500 mg/day) and Vitamin D (800 IU/day) 0 1.75
Torregrosa, 2010 (RCT) 49; 29 50.7 500 mg/day immediately post-transplant; then 1 mg/kg/day tapered to 10 mg/day over 1 month, then to 5 mg/day from 3 to 12 months Tacrolimus with or w/o Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (1500 mg/day) and Vitamin D (400 IU/day) 0 Immediately post-transplant, 1 year follow-up
Trabulus, 2009 (RCT) 21; 38 33.9 Mean cumulative dose of 13.6 g Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus with Azathioprine or Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Alfacalcidol (0.5 μg/day) 0 3.11

Liver

Eastell, 1991 20; 100 ND ND ND ND ND 2
Giuchelaar, 2007 360; 61 49.54 All patients received prednisone; mean dose in fractured patients (4 months post-transplant)= 45.7mg/day Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine with or w/o Azathioprine or Mofetil Mycophenolate 1.5g Cal/day with Vitamin D supplements 4.4 5.3
Krol, 2014 201; 29 53 (median) IV MP 500mg given peri-operatively, then oral GC 20mg/day for 1 week, 10mg/day for 3 months, tapered to discontinue 3-6 months post-transplant. Maintenance= 2.5-10 mg/day. Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus, with or w/o Mofetil Mycophenolate or Sirolimus Calcium (500 mg/day) and Vitamin D (400 IU/day) Patients taking bisphosphonate at baseline or initiating bisphosphonate during study (32%) were excluded 1
Leidig-Bruckner, 2001 130; 42 44.9 ND Tacrolimus: 15% Cyclosporine and Azathioprine: 68% Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 77% 0 3.3
Monegal 2001 45; 36 50.8 1 g of IV MP, tapered to 20 mg/day of prednisone after the first week, 15 mg after 2 months. Cyclosporine and Azathioprine Dietary Calcium intake of 1000 mg/day recommended, not enforced or supplemented 0 3  
Ninkovic, 2002 37; 46 51.3        10mg/kg IV MP, then oral GC 1mg/kg/day tapered to max 30 mg/day at 1 month and 5-10 mg/day at 3 months Cyclosporine ND ND 0.25
Premaor, 2011 531; 38.4 51.7 Pulse MP in 20.3%; Presdnisolone in 97.8%, with a median regimen duration of 3 months Tacrolimus: 90.7% Azathioprine: 92.8% Sirolimus: 25.9% Mofetil Mycophenolate: 11.4% Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 37.8% 27 5.12
Atamaz, 2006 (RCT) 49; 26.5 45 500 mg IV prednisone peri-operatively, then 100 mg/day tapered to 20 mg over 8 days, further tapered from 20 mg to 10 mg/day over 2 months, ultimately discontinued between 6-12 months Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Calcitriol (0.25 μg/day)   0 Immediately post-transplant, 2 year follow-up
Bodingbauer, 2007 (RCT) 49; 24.
5
52 40 mg dexamethasone on the day of transplant, tapered to 4 mg/day by day 5, then substituted with 20 mg methylprednisolone per day, discontinued within 3 months Cyclosporine: 63.6% Tacrolimus: 36.4% Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Vitamin D (800 IU/day) 0 Immediately post-transplant, 2 year follow-up
Crawford, 2006 (RCT) 30; 23 49 500 mg IV MP on day 1, then 20 mg prednisone/day by day 12. Mean daily prednisone dose was 16.4 mg/day at 1 month, tapered to 9.5 mg/day by 3 months, and tapered to 3.8 mg/day by month 12 Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus and Azathioprine Calcium (600 mg/day) and Vitamin D (1000 IU/day) 0 (Patients received an IV placebo) Immediately post-transplant, 1 year follow-up
Guadalix, 2011 (RCT) 44; 14 54.6 500 mg IV MP peri-operatively, then 20 mg prednisone/day, tapered to withdrawal after 3 months Tacrolimus (Cyclosporine or Mofetil Mycophenolate in select patients) Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Vitamin D (800 IU/day) 0 Immediately post-transplant, 1 year follow-up
Kaemmerer, 2010 (RCT) 40; 30 50.9 500 mg IV MP peri-operatively, then tapered based on body weight. Mean cumulative dose after 12 months: 2,426 mg Cyclosporine, Mofetil Mycophenolate, and Anti-thymocyte globulin Calcium (1000 mg/day) and Vitamin D (800-1000 IU/day) 0 Immediately post-transplant, 2 year follow-up

Heart

Dalle Carbonare, 2011 180; 13 53.2 Steroids 100%; mean dose 15.3 mg/day; in 40% mean cumulative dose ≥10 g Cyclosporine and Azathioprine No Calcium/Vitamin D supplementation. Mean daily Calcium intake =887.5 mg 0 3.91
Glendenning, 1999 32; 15.6 50 87.5% receiving steroids; 5-15 mg/day Cyclosporine and Azathioprine 2 patients were taking Calcium/Vitamin D or estrogen supplementation ND Median 2.58
Hariman, 2014 105; 16 55.5 (median, non-fracture); 61 (median, fracture) 68.6% receiving steroids ND   Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 89% 40 1-5
Lee, 1994 31; 0 56 500 mg peri-operatively, 3 doses 125 mg every 8 hours, then tapered to 30 mg/day. Reduced to 5-10 mg/day by 6 months. Mean cumulative dose 6.8 g Cyclosporine and Azathioprine Calcium (1000 mg) and Vitamin D (250 IU) per day   ND 2.17  
Leidig-Bruckner, 2001 105; 16 51.4 ND Cyclosporine Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 94% 0 3.7
Shane, 1993 40; 25 52 Mean 9.7 mg/day; mean cumulative dose 11.3 g Cyclosporine Cal (1000mg/day) and Vitamin D (50,000 IU/week) in 95% ND 2.33
Shane, 1996 47; 28 ND ND ND   Calcium (1000mg/day and Vitamin D (400 IU/day) ND 1
Fahrleitner-Pammer, 2009 (RCT) 17; 0 43.4 IV MP 1 g at the time of transplantation, then 750 mg on day 1 post-transplant, followed by oral prednisolone starting at 15 mg/day for 6 months, tapered until a lifetime maintenance dose of 5 mg/day was reached Cyclosporine and Mofetil Mycophenolate Calcium (500 mg/day) and Vitamin D (400 IU/day) 0 (Patients received an IV placebo) Immediately post-transplant, 1 year follow-up

Lung

Aris, 1996 45; 53 35 Prednisone started 0.5 mg/kg decreased to 15 mg every other day by 7months Cyclosporine . Calcium (1200 mg/day) and Ergocalciferol (800 IU/day) ND ND
Ferrari, 1996 14; 57 47 Prednisone 0.2 mg/kg/day for 1 week, 0.5 mg/kg/ per day for 3 months, then taper to 0.2 mg/kg/day Cyclosporine and Azathioprine Calcium (1000mg/day) and Vitamin D (1000 IU/day) 0 1
Hariman, 2014 210; 48 56 (median, non-fracture); 58 (median, fracture) 91% receiving steroids ND   Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 91% 50 1-5
Spira, 2000 28; 43 53.5 (median) IV MP 500 mg pre-transplant, followed by 0.5 mg/kg/day for the first 4 days. Day 4 post-transplant, prednisone 40 mg/day, tapered to 5 mg every 5 days until a dose of 20 mg during first 3 months Cyclosporine and Azathioprine Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation in 100% 0 1
ND= No data; RCT= Randomized Controlled Trial; IV= Intravenous administration; IU= International Units; MP=  Methylprednisolone; GC= Glucocorticoid
Table 2: Incidence of Fractures in Transplant Patients per 1000 Patient-years (95%CI)
Median age, years % Female, median Hip Fracture Vertebral Fracture Non-Vertebral Fracture Total Fracture

Heart Transplant (8 Observational Studies, 1 RCT*, 1001 Patients)

53

16

3

(-28 to 33)

81

(57 to 106)

10

(-15 to 35)

85

(57 to 114)

Kidney Transplant  (10 Observational Studies, 9 RCTs*, 276,851 Patients)

46

40

4

(1 to 7)

13

(8 to 18)

38

(28 to 47)

41

(37 to 45)

Lung Transplant (4 Observational Studies, 327 Patients)

47

50

4

(-167 to 175)

87

(-22 to 196)

68

(-43 to 179)

126

(2 to 250)

Liver Transplant (7 Observational Studies, 5 RCTs*, 1,887 Patients)

51

33

10

(-22 to 41)

86

(62 to 111)

31

(10 to 52)

107

(80 to 133)

Statistically significant results are shown in bold. 95% CI= 95% Confidence Interval *Randomized trial data was included only from study arms in which patients were receiving either no anti-osteoporotic treatment or were treated with Calcium and Vitamin D alone

 


Disclosure: R. R. Bannuru, None; E. Vaysbrot, None; M. Osani, None; L. Buckley, None; H. Fink, None; T. E. McAlindon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bannuru RR, Vaysbrot E, Osani M, Buckley L, Fink H, McAlindon TE. Fracture Incidence Rates in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fracture-incidence-rates-in-solid-organ-transplant-recipients-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fracture-incidence-rates-in-solid-organ-transplant-recipients-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology