ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 789

Foot Disorders Associated with Over-Pronated and Over-Supinated Foot Types: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Yvonne M. Golightly1, Marian T. Hannan2, Alyssa B. Dufour3, Howard J. Hillstrom4 and Joanne M. Jordan5, 1Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Dept. of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School & Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Rehabilitation, Hospital Special Surgery (HSS), New York, NY, 5Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomechanical testing, foot disorders and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Foot and Gait Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:   Based on clinical observations, musculoskeletal foot disorders, such as hallux valgus or plantar fasciitis, appear to occur more frequently in a pronated foot type.  Other disorders, like hammer toes or Tailor’s bunions, may occur more often in a supinated (high arch) foot type.  The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to determine whether specific foot disorders were associated with over-pronated and over-supinated foot types in a large, bi-racial community-based cohort of men and women 50 years of age or older.

Methods:   Of 1,695 Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project participants clinically evaluated for foot disorders in 2006-2010, complete foot pressure data were available for 1,466 (1,425 with bilateral and 41 with unilateral foot data; mean age 68.5 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 31.2 kg/m2, 67.2% women, 29.5% African American).  Two trained examiners used the validated Foot Assessment Clinical Tool to determine the presence or absence of foot disorders.  Foot pressure scans were recorded for both feet as participants walked at a normal pace over a Tekscan Matscan system (Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA).  The center of pressure excursion index (CPEI) was calculated for each foot.  CPEI cutoff values were set a priori to create a 3-category foot type variable: over-pronated (≤7.3), over-supinated (≥21.0), and neutral (>7.3 to <21.0; referent).  With the foot as the unit of analysis, separate multivariate logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations were performed to examine the association between foot type and each foot disorder, adjusting for age, BMI, gender, and race.  Effect modification between foot type and age, BMI, gender, or race were examined (p<0.10 for interaction was considered statistically significant).

Results: Of 2,891 feet available for analysis, 66.5% had a neutral foot type, 13.9% were over-pronated, and 19.7% were over-supinated.  Hallux valgus was the most common foot disorder (57.1%), followed by overlapping toes (27.1%), hammer toes (25.9%), Morton’s neuroma (6.0%), Tailors’ bunions (5.4%), plantar fasciitis (3.4%), and claw toes (2.1%).  Table shows results of adjusted models.  Compared to a neutral foot type, an over-pronated foot type was associated with hallux valgus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.13-1.65) and overlapping toes (aOR=1.36, 95% CI=1.12-1.64), while an over-supinated foot type was inversely associated with hallux valgus (aOR=0.85, 95% CI=0.74-0.97).  These associations did not differ by age, BMI, gender, or race.

Conclusion:   Hallux valgus and overlapping toes were the only foot disorders strongly related to foot type in this sample.  Future studies should determine the longitudinal association between foot types and foot disorders as well as examine shoe and orthotic interventions for specific foot types as preventive approaches for foot disorders.


Table.

Foot Disorder

Foot Type

Foot disorder /

Foot Type (%)

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

Adjusted* OR (95% CI)

Hallux Valgus

Over-Pronated

277/401 (69.1)

1.41 (1.17-1.70)

1.36 (1.13-1.65)

Neutral

1095/1922 (57.0)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

279/568 (49.1)

0.85 (0.74-0.96)

0.85 (0.74-0.97)

Overlapping Toes

Over-Pronated

136/401 (33.9)

1.38 (1.15-1.67)

1.36 (1.12-1.64)

Neutral

500/1922 (26.0)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

148/568 (26.1)

0.97 (0.80-1.18)

0.97 (0.80-1.18)

Hammer Toes

Over-Pronated

107/401 (26.7)

0.96 (0.75-1.22)

0.89 (0.69-1.15)

Neutral

489/1922 (25.4)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

152/568 (26.8)

0.98 (0.80-1.20)

1.00 (0.81-1.23)

Morton’s Neuroma

Over-Pronated

19/401 (4.7)

0.76 (0.48-1.20)

0.79 (0.49-1.25)

Neutral

115/1922 (6.0)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

40/568 (7.0)

1.14 (0.84-1.53)

1.11 (0.82-1.50)

Tailor’s Bunions

Over-Pronated

36/401 (9.0)

1.14 (0.86-1.51)

1.23 (0.93-1.62)

Neutral

93/1922 (4.8)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

26/568 (4.6)

0.85 (0.59-1.22)

0.85 (0.60-1.22)

Plantar Fasciitis

Over-Pronated

14/401 (3.5)

0.92 (0.50-1.70)

0.98 (0.53-1.82)

Neutral

64/1922 (3.3)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

20/568 (3.5)

1.14 (0.78-1.67)

1.13 (0.76-1.67)

Claw Toes

Over-Pronated

7/401 (1.8)

0.75 (0.37-1.52)

0.69 (0.34-1.42)

Neutral

42/1922 (2.2)

1.00

1.00

Over-Supinated

11/568 (1.9)

0.93 (0.51-1.69)

0.89 (0.48-1.64)

*Adjusted for age, BMI, gender, race.


Disclosure:

Y. M. Golightly,
None;

M. T. Hannan,
None;

A. B. Dufour,
None;

H. J. Hillstrom,
None;

J. M. Jordan,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/foot-disorders-associated-with-over-pronated-and-over-supinated-foot-types-the-johnston-county-osteoarthritis-project/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology