ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2698

FMS and SLE Patients Have Higher Treatment Expectations Than RA Patients

Robert S. Katz1, Hannah Bond2, Jessica L. Polyak2, Lauren Kwan2 and Susan Shott1, 1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rheumatology Associates, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disability

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: It is anticipated that patients with high expectations for improvement of their medical condition may get frustrated when a significant degree of benefit does not occur with treatment. Medication and the non-medication therapy of fibromyalgia can be challenging. We asked fibromyalgia patients what their expectations were regarding past and current treatment. 

Methods: Office patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about their expectations of treatment with respect to its general effect and its effect on pain, sleep quality, quality of life, and energy. Each item was rated 1-3 with 3 indicating the highest expectations. A total expectation score consisting of the mean of these expectation items was calculated. Patients also rated from 1-3 how challenging their rheumatic disease was with 3 as the most challenging rating. Three diagnosis groups were compared with respect to questionnaire responses: 91 FMS patients, 34 RA patients, and 14 SLE patients. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare groups with respect to the items and total scores, and the Spearman correlation was used to test for linear association between the disease challenge rating and the total expectation score for each group, with a two-sided 0.05 significance level.

Results:

Compared to RA patients, FMS patients considered their disease significantly more challenging (FMS 2.2 ± 0.7, RA 1.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and had significantly higher general treatment expectations (FMS 1.8 ± 0.5, RA 1.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001), significantly higher treatment expectations concerning pain (FMS 1.8 ± 0.6, RA 1.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.010), and significantly higher total treatment expectation scores (FMS 1.9 ± 0.4, RA 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.009). Compared to RA patients, SLE patients also had significantly higher general treatment expectations (SLE 2.0 ± 0.6, RA 1.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001), significantly higher treatment expectations concerning pain (SLE 2.0 ± 0.7, RA 1.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.011), and significantly higher total treatment expectation scores (SLE 2.0 ± 0.6, RA 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.037). There were no statistically significant differences between FMS and SLE patients. For each group, a statistically significant positive Spearman correlation was found between the disease challenge rating and the total expectation score, so that higher expectation scores were associated with higher disease challenge ratings: FMS rho = 0.37 (p = 0.001), RA rho = 0.50 (p = 0.005), SLE rho = 0.58 (p = 0.0498).

Conclusion: Patients with fibromyalgia who have higher expectations for significant improvement may find be impossible to meet those expectations in many cases.  A meaningful therapeutic relationship can help some patients cope with their illness better, but many fibromyalgia patients are currently frustrated by a lack of significant benefit from current therapy, especially those patients who have high expectations for improvement. Cognitive behavior therapy might help some patients with unrealistic expectations cope with their illness better.


Disclosure:

R. S. Katz,
None;

H. Bond,
None;

J. L. Polyak,
None;

L. Kwan,
None;

S. Shott,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fms-and-sle-patients-have-higher-treatment-expectations-than-ra-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology