ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 584

Flare in Spondyloarthritis: Proposal of a Meaningful Change in Symptomatic Outcome Measures in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Maxime Dougados1, Emily Wood2, Laure Gossec3, Désirée van der Heijde4 and Isabelle Logeart5, 1Université Paris René Descartes and Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 2Biostatistics, Quanticate, Hitchin, England, 3Rheumatology, UPMC GRC08, Paris 06 University, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France, 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 5Pfizer, Paris, France

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: epidemiologic methods and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Recognition of flare is important in both daily practice and clinical trial setting. However, there is no clear definition of flare in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. SPARSE was a randomized controlled trial evaluating the NSAID-sparing effect of etanercept in axial spondyloarthritis. All patients had to be on NSAIDs prior to screening and were requested to discontinue their NSAID therapy at screening. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the threshold in the changes in symptomatic outcome measures in case of a restart of NSAID, which was considered as a flare.

Methods: Patients: Axial spondyloarthritis (ASAS criteria) with active disease (BASDAI ≥ 4) refractory to NSAIDs and justifying anti-TNF therapy. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Study period of interest: This analysis was focused on the period between screening and baseline. During this period, patients were requested to stop their NSAID therapy and to restart the NSAID only if they experienced clinical deterioration. In this case, patients were asked to complete a diary. Analysis: The proposal of a meaningful change in symptomatic outcome measures was based on the 75th percentile technique. The 75thpercentiles of the change in the evaluated outcome measures between screening and re-starting NSAIDs were examined for the subgroup of patients who were able to stop NSAID therapy for at least 2 consecutive days and subsequently had to restart their NSAID therapy (i.e. those patients who flared). Evaluated outcome measures: The BASDAI score and each component of the BASDAI.

Results:

Of the 128 screened patients, 91 (71.1%) had an available BASDAI at the screening visit and 45 (35.2 %) were able to stop their NSAID therapy for at least 2 consecutive days. Of these 45 patients, 32 optimally completed their diary the day they had to restart their NSAID. The table summarizes the observed values for the study variables at screening and flare (time of NSAID restarting) in these 32 patients.

Variable

 

Screening

Changes from Screening to Flare

Absolute

Percentage

BASDAI total score

Mean ± SD

5.8 ± 1.2

0.7 ± 1.2

13 ± 21

 

(Median)

(5.8)

(0.8)

(14)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

1.5 [1.2, 1.9]

28 [20, 38]

BASDAI question #1

Mean ± SD

6.7 ± 1.6

0.8 ± 1.9

23 ± 54

(fatigue)

(Median)

(7.0)

(1.0)

(13.0)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

2.0 [1.0, 3.0]

25 [17, 67]

BASDAI question #2

Mean ± SD

6.6 ± 1.5

0.8 ± 1.6

16 ± 27

(axial)

(Median)

(7.0)

(1.0)

(14)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

2.0 [2.0, 2.0]

33 [29, 43]

BASDAI question #3

Mean ± SD

4.3 ± 2.8

0.1 ± 2.5

16 ± 80

(peripheral)

(Median)

(5.0)

(0.0)

(0)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

2.0 [1.0, 3.0]

50 [13, 100]

BASDAI question #4

Mean ± SD

5.0 ± 2.3

0.9 ± 2.5

43 ± 128

(enthesitis)

(Median)

(5.0)

(1.0)

(17)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

2.0 [1.0, 3.0]

43 [25, 100]

BASDAI question #5/6

Mean ± SD

6.5 ± 1.7

0.6 ± 1.3

12 ± 23

(morning stiffness)

(Median)

(6.5)

(0.5)

(7)

 

75th Percentile [95% CI]

 

1.5 [1.0, 2.5]

27 [11, 43]

Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no universal change that is applicable to all variables. However, an absolute change of at least 2 on a scale of 10 or a relative change of 30% is indicative of a meaningful symptomatic deterioration for most of the symptomatic variables included in the BASDAI score.


Disclosure:

M. Dougados,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

E. Wood,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

L. Gossec,
None;

D. van der Heijde,
None;

I. Logeart,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/flare-in-spondyloarthritis-proposal-of-a-meaningful-change-in-symptomatic-outcome-measures-in-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology