ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 862

First Use of Cenerimod, a Selective sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 (S1P1) Receptor Modulator, for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II, Proof-of-Concept Study

Viktoria Hermann1, Anastas Batalov 2, Svetlana Smakotina 3 and Peter Cornelisse 1, 1Idorsia, Allschwil, Switzerland, 2Medical University of Plovdiv, University Hospital Kaspela, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 3Kemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital, Kemerovo, Russia

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cenerimod, Phase II, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor and S1P1, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S081: SLE – Clinical I: Clinical Trials (857–862)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Aberrantly activated T- and B-lymphocytes play a major pathophysiological role in SLE. Cenerimod, a potent, selective sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator, blocks the egress of lymphocytes from lymphoid organs, thereby reducing their availability, thus providing rationale for development. The study investigated the effect of cenerimod on circulating lymphocytes, disease activity, safety and pharmacokinetics in SLE patients. 

Methods: This study was conducted in two parts, separated by a safety review. Patients with SLEDAI-2K score ≥2 points for mucocutaneous or musculoskeletal manifestations and positive serum test for ANA or anti-dsDNA antibodies were randomised evenly in Part A to cenerimod 0.5, 1, or 2 mg or placebo once daily (QD) and 3:1 in Part B to cenerimod 4 mg or placebo QD and treated for 12 weeks. Predefined Day 1 safety assessments included heart rate (HR) monitoring and hourly 12-lead ECG monitoring (pre dose, to 6 hours post-dose). Endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), changes in total lymphocyte count, SLEDAI-2K score (modified [mSLEDAI] to exclude leucopoenia), biomarker anti-dsDNA antibody and pharmacokinetic assessments. All 67 patients (A: 49; B: 18) met at least 4 ACR criteria in the past, 70% had 4 to 11 ACR criteria ongoing at screening. Mean (SD) mSLEDAI-2K was 7.7 (±3.1) at baseline.

Results: Part A included 49 patients (12:12:13:12 receiving cenerimod 0.5, 1, 2 mg or placebo); Part B included 18 (13 cenerimod 4 mg; 5 placebo). Cenerimod dose-dependently reduced total lymphocyte count from baseline to end of treatment (EOT; p< 0.001; Figure 1). In pairwise comparisons, cenerimod 1, 2, and 4 mg significantly decreased lymphocytes versus placebo (all p< 0.001). Exploratory analyses indicated clinical and biological improvement with cenerimod 4 mg with an estimated mean treatment effect on change from baseline to EOT in mSLEDAI-2K score of −2.420 (p=0.0306; Figure 2), and a decrease in anti-dsDNA of −28.80 U/mL (p=0.0146) compared with placebo. All treatment groups reported similar and non-dose-related rates of TEAEs (cenerimod 0.5: 41.7%; 1: 41.7%; 2: 46.2%; 4 mg: 38.5%; and placebo: 58.8%). After the first dose, cenerimod induced minimal, transient and dose-dependent decreases in HR; no patient had an HR < 40 bpm at any time post baseline. Small decreases in pulmonary function, not dose-related, were observed in cenerimod-treated patients at EOT. Cenerimod did not increase blood pressure or show any effects on laboratory variables. Trough plasma concentrations revealed steady-state conditions were reached after 4–8 weeks of QD dosing and dose-proportionality was observed.

Conclusion: Cenerimod has the potential to be a new therapeutic approach for patients with SLE and has shown to date an acceptable efficacy and safety profile with minimal, non-clinically relevant cardiovascular effects. These results warrant further evaluation in a larger study over a longer treatment duration. A Phase IIb, randomised dose-finding study was initiated in December 2018 to evaluate efficacy and safety of cenerimod in addition to background therapy in moderate-to-severe SLE (NCT03742037).

Medical writing support provided by Zoe Kelly (InterComm) funded by Idorsia. 

Figure 1. Estimation of dose-response relationship for absolute change from baseline to end of treatment.
The MCP-Mod approach was performed for each of the five considered dose-response models. Plot shows the maximum effect -Emax- curve, with 95% CI -dashed lines-, related to the model with the highest t-statistic. CI, confidence intervals; EOT, end of treatment; MCP-Mod, Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modelling.

Figure 2. Absolute change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score. Box and whisker plot indicates the interquartile range -box-, upper and lower 1.5 interquartile range -whiskers-, mean and median -cross and horizontal line, respectively, within the box-, and outliers at least above or below 1.5 times the interquartile range -dots-. mSLEDAI-2K modified to exclude leucopoenia. EOS, end of study; EOT, end of treatment; mSLEDAI-2K, modified SLE Disease Activity Index-2000.


Disclosure: V. Hermann, Idorsia, 1, 3; A. Batalov, AbbVie, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5; S. Smakotina, None; P. Cornelisse, Idorsia, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hermann V, Batalov A, Smakotina S, Cornelisse P. First Use of Cenerimod, a Selective sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 (S1P1) Receptor Modulator, for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II, Proof-of-Concept Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-use-of-cenerimod-a-selective-sphingosine-1-phosphate-1-s1p1-receptor-modulator-for-the-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-double-blind-randomised-placebo-controlled-phase-ii-pr/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-use-of-cenerimod-a-selective-sphingosine-1-phosphate-1-s1p1-receptor-modulator-for-the-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-double-blind-randomised-placebo-controlled-phase-ii-pr/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology