ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2119

Findings and Therapeutic Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Studies for Patients with Lower Back Pain with Neurologic Symptoms. Are We Choosing Wisely?

Patrick Nguyen1, Nathalie Carrier2 and Ariel Masetto3, 1Internal Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 2Division of Rheumatology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 3Rheumatology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: low back pain and neurologic involvement, MRI

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: According to different guidelines, the presence of neurological symptoms in patients with lower back pain (LBP) is a validated indication for more complex imaging studies, including lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).  This could help in confirming clinical diagnosis and eventually establishing a treatment plan. We aimed to study the findings and clinical impact of lumbar spine MRI indicated for patients with LBP complicated by neurologic symptoms in our center. 

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 436 consecutive lumbar spine MRI studies between 2010 and 2013.Our variables of interest were: age, source of the MRI request (general practitioners -GPs- or specialists), “positive” MRI findings (MRI confirming any kind of neurologic compression), correlation between described history and MRI findings, aetiology of neurological compression (osteoarthritis or discal degenerative disease) and finally, the clinical impact on treatment (considered positive for invasive treatment such as steroid injections or surgery versus negative for non-invasive treatment or clinical therapy).

Results: We selected 355 MRIs indicated for LBP with lower limb neurologic symptoms. Patients’ mean age was 52,3 ± 14,1 years, 44.9% female. Most MRI requests, 231(70%), came from GPs. The majority of described neurologic symptoms were sensitive 318 (89,3%). Contrary to our expectations, the rate of normal MRIs was significantly higher in MRIs indicated for motor than sensory symptoms: 15.8% vs 5.7%, respectively (p=0.032). We found normal MRI (with no neurological compressions) in 156 (43.9%) of patients. Among the 199 (56.1%) positive MRIs, there was a dissonance between history and MRI findings in 22 (11,1%) patients. Adding normal MRI studies (156) and MRI with neurologic compressions but without clinical concordance (22) : 178/355 (50,1%) of MRI were negative for clinical relevant neurologic compressions. The likelihood of asking for a positive MRI didn’t differ between GPs and specialists (p=0,84). Only 87 patients (24,4%) had any invasive procedure, 46 (12,9%) had steroid injections and 41 (11,5%) had surgery. Patients whom MRI was prescribed by a specialist instead of a GP had a significantly higher rate of having an invasive procedure: 37.3% vs 18.6%, respectively (p<0.001). 

Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, half of MRI studies indicated for LBP with supposed neurologic symptoms were negative. In patients with positive MRIs, just one fourth had any kind of invasive procedure. Lumbar spine MRI studies are probably being overused in our center. We hypothesize potential misinterpretation of lower back pain with leg irradiation as true neurologic radicular symptoms.  Moreover, even true radicular pain often resolves with non-invasive treatment. MRI studies should be reserved for refractory cases or those presenting major motor symptoms needing a more invasive treatment such as spinal injections or surgery.


Disclosure: P. Nguyen, None; N. Carrier, None; A. Masetto, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nguyen P, Carrier N, Masetto A. Findings and Therapeutic Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Studies for Patients with Lower Back Pain with Neurologic Symptoms. Are We Choosing Wisely? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/findings-and-therapeutic-impact-of-magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-studies-for-patients-with-lower-back-pain-with-neurologic-symptoms-are-we-choosing-wisely/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/findings-and-therapeutic-impact-of-magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-studies-for-patients-with-lower-back-pain-with-neurologic-symptoms-are-we-choosing-wisely/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology