ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2743

Favorable Efficacy of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Patients with Excessive B Cell Differentiation

Yusuke Miyazaki1, Shingo Nakayamada1, Satoshi Kubo1, Kazuhisa Nakano1, Shigeru Iwata2, Shunsuke Fukuyo3, Akio Kawabe4 and Yoshiya Tanaka5, 1First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Fukuoka, Japan, 4University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyusyu, Japan, 5University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: ANCA, B cells, rituximab and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Vasculitis – ANCA-Associated Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

B cell depletion by rituximab (RTX)is effective treatment for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the phenotype of peripheral B cells and the selection criteria for RTX in AAV remain unclear. We assessed the correlation between B cell phenotype and clinical outcome of RTX therapy in AAV patients.

Methods:

All AAV patients who were introduced to remission induction therapy were registered for immunophenotyping-analysis using multi-colour flow cytometry. Phenotypiccharacterization of the circulating T cells and B cells were defined by 8-color flow cytometric analysis for “Human Immunology Project” termed by NIH/FOCIS in 58 AAV patients (18 GPA and 40 MPA). Based on the judgement by physicians who do not know the result of immunophenotyping-analysis, the patients were consideredsuitable to receive immunosuppressive drugs (conventional immune suppressants group; n=28) or RTX (RTX group; n=30). All patients also received high dose glucocorticoids (GC). We assessed the phenotype of circulating T cells and B cells, the correlation between these lymphocytes and clinical findings in active AAV and evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes at 6 months after treatment. Definition of clinical improvement was a reduction of 50% or more in BVAS in vital organs without relapse.

Results:

The proportions of naïve CD4+ T cells was higher, while that of central memory CD4+ T cells was lower, in AAV patients than healthy control (HC). Higher proportions of IgD–CD27– B cells and lower proportions of IgM memory B cells, were found in AAV patients compared with HC. The proportion of IgD–CD27–or class-switched memory B cells was increased in 23 out of 58 patients (40%) compared with HC. The rate of improvement in BVAS negatively correlated with the proportion of naive B cells and positively correlated with that of IgD–CD27–B cells. There was no correlation between the proportion of CD4+ T cell-phenotype and the rate of improvement. Twenty nine out of 30 patients (97%) in RTX group achieved clinical improvement. Among 28 patients in conventional immune suppressants group (including 20 intravenous cyclophosphamide and 8 azathioprine), 23 patients (82%) achieved clinical improvement. There was no significant difference in the rate of improvement, relapses, serious adverse events between the two treatment groups. The rate of clinical improvement in patients with excessive B cell differentiation was significantly lower than in patients withoutexcessive B cell differentiation. In the patients with excessive B cell differentiation, the rates of survival, improvement in BVAS and GC reduction were significantly higher in RTX group than in conventional immune suppressants group at 6 months after treatment.

Conclusion:

The presence of excessive B cell differentiation was associated with treatment resistance. However,in the patients with excessive B cell differentiation,RTX was effective and showed rapid effect of GC tapering and higher survival rate compared to conventional immune suppressants. The results suggested thatmulti-color flow cytometry might be useful for the selection of RTX therapy in AAV patients.


Disclosure: Y. Miyazaki, None; S. Nakayamada, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Astellas, Abbvie, Eisai, Pfizer, Takeda, 8,Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis and MSD, 2; S. Kubo, Bristol-Myers, Pfizer, and Takeda, 8; K. Nakano, UCB, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 8,Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Eisai, 2; S. Iwata, None; S. Fukuyo, None; A. Kawabe, None; Y. Tanaka, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, YL Biologics, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, 8,Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Astellas, Abbvie, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Kyowa- Kirin, Eisai, Ono, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Miyazaki Y, Nakayamada S, Kubo S, Nakano K, Iwata S, Fukuyo S, Kawabe A, Tanaka Y. Favorable Efficacy of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Patients with Excessive B Cell Differentiation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/favorable-efficacy-of-rituximab-in-anca-associated-vasculitis-patients-with-excessive-b-cell-differentiation/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/favorable-efficacy-of-rituximab-in-anca-associated-vasculitis-patients-with-excessive-b-cell-differentiation/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology