ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1917

Falls Among Hospitalized Orthopedic Patients: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Lisa A. Mandl1, Wei-Ti Huang2, Jaimie Lee3, Tina Bailey3, Danielle Edwards3, Patricia Quinlan3, Mayu Sasaki3 and Steven K. Magid4, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Dept of Rheumatic Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Fall Risk and orthopaedic

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Background/Purpose:

This study evaluated rates and predictors of falls among adult orthopedic in-patients at a musculoskeletal specialty hospital.

Methods:

 

Researchers prospectively studied falls from 5/2/10-5/1/12. Two controls were matched to every fall on age, post-operative day (POD), type of orthopedic procedure, and each assigned the index time that their case fell. Data were collected via chart review and patient questionnaire. Medical record data for controls was abstracted from last note prior to the index time or first note after. Differences between cases and controls were compared using t-test or chi-square test, as appropriate.  A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of falls.

Results:

There were 169 falls during the study timeframe.  The fall rate was 0.65 of in-patient orthopedic admissions; 1.67 falls/1000 in-patient days. The average age of cases was 68.4 yrs, (SD 12.7), 55% were women, mean BMI was 29.4, (SD 6.5), and average POD was 2.9 (SD 2.5). One patient fell twice. 39.5% of falls occurred in total knee replacements (TKR), 23.3% in total hip replacements (THR), 25.8% in spine procedures, 9.6% in lower extremity procedures and 1.8% in upper extremity procedures. 92% of falls occurred in the patients’ room. Neither a known history of falls nor wearing a “falls risk” bracelet was associated with falling. Fallers were less likely to use a crutch or cane, more likely to use a walker, and more likely to be in a single occupancy room. Cases walked significantly fewer feet and required significantly more physical therapy (PT) ambulation assistance than controls. 31% of falls involved using the bathroom. Of 168 first falls, 28 (17%) resulted in injuries, most of which were minor. 8 falls (4.8%) resulted in 10 serious adverse events (AEs), including 4 dehiscence/return OR, 3 transfer to a higher level of care, 2 dislocations and 1 fracture.  There we no deaths or intracranial/epidural bleeds.

In a logistic regression controlling for significant univariate predictors (single room occupancy, confusion, being assigned canes/crutches, using a walker or needing physical therapy assistance to ambulate) the only predictors of falls were confusion (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.4-4.8) and using a walker (OR 28.6; 95% CI 6.5-125.0). Being in a double occupancy room was borderline protective against falling (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.3-1.003). Among TKR, having a femoral block trended towards being associated with falls (p-value=0.057). There were no significant predictors of AEs.

Conclusion:

The rate of falls and AEs in this patient population was low. This large series identifies confusion and using a walker as being predictive of falling among orthopedic in-patients.  Larger studies are needed to confirm these results, and to inform fall prevention strategies in this rapidly growing group of patients.


Disclosure:

L. A. Mandl,

Boehringer Ingelheim,

2;

W. T. Huang,
None;

J. Lee,
None;

T. Bailey,
None;

D. Edwards,
None;

P. Quinlan,
None;

M. Sasaki,
None;

S. K. Magid,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/falls-among-hospitalized-orthopedic-patients-a-prospective-case-control-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology