ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2384

Factors Associated with Methotrexate Treatment Duration, Including Subcutaneous Use, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observations from the VA Database

Bernard Ng, Rheumatology, U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs- Puget Sound Healthsystem, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical practice, Disease Activity, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: A previous analysis of RA patients in national administrative databases of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) suggested that injectable MTX was associated with a higher likelihood to remain on MTX monotherapy. We seek to determine whether RA patients in the VA database treated with injectable MTX after being unable to tolerate or having inadequate response to oral MTX remain on MTX monotherapy longer than those treated only with oral MTX. We also compare the rates of liver enzyme abnormalities between patients using injectable MTX monotherapy and those using oral MTX monotherapy.

Methods: The duration of MTX monotherapy before a therapeutic change was required (defined as switching to or adding another DMARD or biologic agent) was compared between patients treated with injectable MTX for at least 30 days and those who were treated only with oral MTX using a Wilcoxon-Matt-Whitney test. Factors that could potentially influence the duration of MTX monotherapy in subjects with therapeutic change included the use of injectable MTX, gender, age, race, starting MTX dose, maximum MTX dose, and modified Charlson comorbidity score. These factors were assessed using a log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves; in order to correct for patient variables, linear regression models were also run. Liver enzyme abnormalities were compared between patients on injectable and oral MTX who received MTX monotherapy for >90 days; abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were defined as exceeding twice the upper limit of normal.

Results: Of the 7107 patients who were treated with MTX monotherapy for >90 days, 3910 required a therapeutic change (3808 were treated with oral MTX, 102 with injectable MTX). Patients treated with oral MTX remained on MTX monotherapy for a mean (SD) of 627 (636.5) days compared with 962 (786.6) days for patients treated with injectable MTX monotherapy (P<0.001). Based on log-rank tests (see figure) and linear regression models, the use of injectable MTX was significantly associated with longer duration of MTX monotherapy (P=0.0018 and P<0.001, respectively). When adjusted for patient variables, the duration of MTX monotherapy was also significantly associated with age, race, starting MTX dose, and maximum MTX dose. Of the patients treated with MTX who also had ALT and/or AST levels assessed, the rates of abnormal ALT and AST levels were not significantly different between those receiving oral and injectable MTX (P=0.870 and P=0.056, respectively).

Conclusion: Among patients identified in the VA database, the use of injectable MTX was associated with a significantly longer duration of MTX monotherapy compared with oral MTX. No significant differences in liver enzyme abnormalities were found between patients treated with injectable MTX and oral MTX.


Disclosure:

B. Ng,

Antares Pharma,

2;

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-associated-with-methotrexate-treatment-duration-including-subcutaneous-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-observations-from-the-va-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology