ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0156

Factors Associated with Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening in Ethnically Diverse Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Sebastian Bruera1, Savannah Bowman1, Yinan Huang2, Maria Suarez-Almazor3, Grace Lo1, Elizabeth Chiao4, Maria A. Lopez-Olivo4 and Sandeep Agarwal1, 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 2Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Oxford, MS, 3MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 4The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Health Services Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0155–0175) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Women living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infections from human papillomavirus (HPV), and cervical cancer, especially women with higher disease activity who require immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to determine cervical cancer screening rates in women with SLE, and to evaluate their attitudes and beliefs towards screening.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we enrolled consecutive women with a diagnosis of SLE by 2019 ACR criteria. Eligible women were ≥21 years old, without a prior hysterectomy or history of cervical cancer. We collected demographics, clinical characteristics, constructs of the Health Beliefs Model (HBM) (susceptibility, severity, perceived barriers, benefits, cues to action, and self-efficacy) and self-reported last cervical cancer screening (confirmed with the electronic medical record). Our primary outcome was adherence to cervical cancer screening according to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between the SLE disease activity attributes and the cervical cancer screening and to explore the mediation effect of HBM constructs between disease activity and screening adherence.

Results: We enrolled 130 women with SLE to our study, the majority of whom were Black (35%) or Hispanic (52%), with a median age of 42. The cervical cancer screening adherence rate was 61.5%. Women with higher disease activity (SLEDAI < 6) underwent screening less frequently than those with low disease activity (76% vs 24%, p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for demographics and clinical factors showed higher disease activity had a decreased odds of being screened than low disease activity (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.76, p < 0.02). HBM constructs, particularly perceived barriers (r=-0.30, p< 0.01) and self-efficacy (r=0.21, p< 0.05) were significantly correlated with the receipt of cervical cancer screening. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariates and mediation effects of each HBM construct showed that SLE patients with high disease activity had decreased probability of cervical cancer screening (‘perceived susceptibility’: aOR 0.2548, p < 0.01; ‘perceived severity’: aOR 0.2552, p< 0.01; ‘perceived barriers’: aOR 0.2809, p< 0.01; ‘perceived benefits’: aOR 0.2491, p< 0.01; ‘self-efficacy’: aOR 0.2734, p< 0.01; ‘cues to action’: aOR 0.2602, p< 0.01).

Conclusion: Our results show that only 61.5% of women with SLE underwent screening according to ASCCP guidelines. Concerningly, only 24% of those with high disease activity, the highest risk population, had been screened. While some individual attitudes and beliefs partially explained these low rates, low odds for screening remained after adjustment. Our findings indicate the need for ascertainment of cervical cancer screening utilization in this high risk population as needed following ASCCP recommendations.


Disclosures: S. Bruera: None; S. Bowman: None; Y. Huang: None; M. Suarez-Almazor: Celgene, 1, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Syneos Health, 1; G. Lo: None; E. Chiao: None; M. Lopez-Olivo: None; S. Agarwal: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bruera S, Bowman S, Huang Y, Suarez-Almazor M, Lo G, Chiao E, Lopez-Olivo M, Agarwal S. Factors Associated with Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening in Ethnically Diverse Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-associated-with-adherence-to-cervical-cancer-screening-in-ethnically-diverse-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-associated-with-adherence-to-cervical-cancer-screening-in-ethnically-diverse-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology