ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2586

Exposure-Response Modelling and Exposure-Safety Modelling Analyses in Two Phase II Studies of Atacicept in SLE

Orestis Papasouliotis1, Oezkan Yalkinoglu1, Cristina Vazquez-Mateo2, Stephen Wax3, Amy H. Kao2, Peter Chang3, Patricia Fleuranceau-morel2 and Lisa Mahnke2, 1Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 2EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, MA, 3EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), BIllerica, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: APRIL, B cell targeting, BLyS and Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapeutics and Clinical Trial Design

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Atacicept targets the B-cell stimulating factors BLyS and APRIL, and has been shown to reduce SLE disease activity. Our analyses evaluated the exposure-response and exposure-safety relationships for atacicept 75 mg and 150 mg doses.

Methods: APRIL-SLE (NCT00624338) and ADDRESS II (NCT01972568) were phase II, placebo-controlled multicenter studies in patients (pts) with autoantibody-positive SLE. Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to weekly SC injections of atacicept (75 or 150 mg) or placebo (PBO). In APRIL-SLE, pts had BILAG A/B flare at Screening that was reduced to BILAG C/D before randomization using corticosteroids with taper; the primary endpoint was BILAG A/B flare over 52 weeks. In ADDRESS II, pts had SLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 at Screening; the primary endpoint was SRI-4 response at Week 24. SLE responder index (SRI)-6 response was analysed post-hoc in pts with high disease activity (HDA; SLEDAI-2K ≥10). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) model-derived exposure vs the probability of response (BILAG A/B flare, SRI-4, SRI-6), exploratory analysis of exposure vs safety, and population model simulations of serum IgG were analyzed.

Results: Exposure-response modelling suggests a relationship between atacicept exposure and SLE clinical response [Fig. 1], including serum IgG changes from baseline [Fig. 2]. The optimal atacicept exposure was AUCtau,ss ≥ ~1 mg.hr/mL, which is more achievable with weekly SC doses of atacicept 150 mg than 75 mg across a range of body weights. Body weight-based dosing is unlikely to offer any value over a fixed 150 mg dose, based on comparable predicted clinical response. In HDA pts, serum IgG change from baseline was linked to the probability of SRI-6 response. Greater IgG reductions from baseline were associated with higher atacicept exposure [Fig.2]; however, even at the highest exposure range, mean IgG reductions did not exceed ~ 40%. There was no association between serious/severe infections and exposure by PK quartile.

Conclusion:   Exposure-response modelling indicated that there are robust relationships between atacicept exposure and clinical response or IgG levels in SLE pts over time; this supports the proposed mechanism of action for atacicept. Atacicept 150 mg weekly SC is likely to provide an effective level of exposure with an acceptable safety profile. There was no evidence of an increased risk of severe or serious infections at higher exposures. Based on these results, the 150 mg dose merits further evaluation.

 

 


Disclosure: O. Papasouliotis, Merck KGaA, 3; O. Yalkinoglu, Merck KGaA, 3; C. Vazquez-Mateo, EMD Serono, Inc, 3; S. Wax, EMD Serono, Inc., 3; A. H. Kao, EMD Serono, Inc, 3; P. Chang, EMD Serono, Inc, 3; P. Fleuranceau-morel, EMD Serono, Inc, 3; L. Mahnke, EMD Serono, Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Papasouliotis O, Yalkinoglu O, Vazquez-Mateo C, Wax S, Kao AH, Chang P, Fleuranceau-morel P, Mahnke L. Exposure-Response Modelling and Exposure-Safety Modelling Analyses in Two Phase II Studies of Atacicept in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exposure-response-modelling-and-exposure-safety-modelling-analyses-in-two-phase-ii-studies-of-atacicept-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exposure-response-modelling-and-exposure-safety-modelling-analyses-in-two-phase-ii-studies-of-atacicept-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology